popsjumper 2 #51 October 4, 2011 Quote Whoosh the thread skips over a sensible factual post in order to keep the "debate" alive and well Aw, c'mon, Nigel. Nobody listens to Andy908 anymore in SC. He violates custom at every turn what with injecting common sense into SC threads and all. Geez. My reality and yours are quite different. I think we're all Bozos on this bus. Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,596 #52 October 4, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteWhy didn't Timothy McVie get the same treatment? Because when McVeigh was identified as the bomber he was already in custody. Do you thnk they should have sent an airstrike against the jail? So if he hadn't been in jail, you would have supported blowing him up with a missle or an assasination squad slipping in his house in the middle of the night an killing him? No, I just thought I'd give the most obvious reason first why your question was totally bloody stupid. I have to say though, it seems to me that you're simply quibbling about method rather than result. If McVeigh had been free when he was identified do you think the police or Feds would have hesitated to kill him if neccesary?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
