JohnRich 4 #1 September 30, 2011 How utterly refreshing. makes a change from the "We love Obama" hopey-changey it's-Bush's-fault etc etc.. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2043516/Controversy-erupts-billboard-shows-baby-Barack-Obama-crying-wearing-diaper.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maxmadmax 8 #2 September 30, 2011 And now the liberals will shout foul....lmao. A lot worse was done to GB. Don't go away mad....just go away! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
460 0 #3 September 30, 2011 George Bush sucked as a president. What worse things were done to mock Bush?Looks like a death sandwich without the bread - Steve Deadman Morrell, BASE 174 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #4 September 30, 2011 City Council Member Susan Guidry: "'We have to determine that there is a zoning law that prohibits perhaps the size of the sign, perhaps the way that it's erected, that it is leaning over onto public property. Whatever we can use, we will, but of course, we do have to balance that with First Amendment rights.' They are LOOKING for a reason to take it down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grimmie 186 #5 September 30, 2011 I think that's pretty funny, actually Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #6 September 30, 2011 I think it's funny! Maybe, just maybe, this country might be getting it's sense of humor back!? We as a nation have gotten so self centered and up-tight, we've forgotten how to laugh. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #7 September 30, 2011 QuoteCity Council Member Susan Guidry: "We have to determine that there is a zoning law that prohibits perhaps the size of the sign, perhaps the way that it's erected, that it is leaning over onto public property. Whatever we can use, we will, but of course, we do have to balance that with First Amendment rights." They are LOOKING for a reason to take it down. At least they haven't cried that it's "racism". Yet. That will come when their search for a bureaucratic excuse to remove it fails. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
devildog 0 #8 September 30, 2011 QuoteQuoteCity Council Member Susan Guidry: "We have to determine that there is a zoning law that prohibits perhaps the size of the sign, perhaps the way that it's erected, that it is leaning over onto public property. Whatever we can use, we will, but of course, we do have to balance that with First Amendment rights." They are LOOKING for a reason to take it down. At least they haven't cried that it's "racism". Yet. That will come when their search for a bureaucratic excuse to remove it fails. I saw a tv report on it where the racism card was played by a number of the people interviewed. I'll see if I can dig it upYou stop breathing for a few minutes and everyone jumps to conclusions. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #9 October 3, 2011 QuoteCity Council Member Susan Guidry is LOOKING for a reason to take it down. FIFY - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites