kallend 2,150 #201 August 27, 2011 QuoteQuoteWhy, then, did you present the data for 2000 and 2009? (Posts #78 and 87, this very thread). Short-term memory giving you trouble again, or just weaseling as usual? Short term memory giving you trouble again, or just lying about my posts as usual? I provided the data for individual years, not data comparing them. Feel free to show where I that there X percent more/less tax collected in total between the years, or X percent more/less returns between the years - you know, something that would actually make your claim be TRUE. The weasel master strikes again. Your posts are self-explantory and there for all to read.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #202 August 27, 2011 QuoteYour posts are self-explantory and there for all to read. So show the direct comparison. Show where I said "X" percent more taxes were collected in year "Y" - you know, something that would make your summation of my post actually be TRUE, for once.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #203 August 29, 2011 Once mnealtx pulls his, "show me where I said..." routine, the thread is dead. Let it die. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #204 August 29, 2011 QuoteOnce mnealtx pulls his, "show me where I said..." routine, the thread is dead. Let it die. Not my fault they argue against strawmen instead of what I actually wrote. BTW - the thread *was* dead due to just that until you brought it back up for your attempt at a cheap shot.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #205 August 29, 2011 QuoteQuote before your great Economist who did such a stellar job with every form of business or government entity he ever touched came to power. You don't know shit about me. "your" gmab Quote There is something to be learned from that.. if only the GOAT FUCK STUPID.... would actually listen and learn ROTFLOL, the only "goat fucking" that has gone on has to be the mods that allow you to basically make comments like that. I'm so impressed that you hang out with people that make mid 6 figures. As far as rich goes. Impressive if I can read between the "goat fuck stupid" replies...that you make over $100,000k but I clearly stated that it didn't matter where the fuck you live. Have you noticed that tax brackets aren't based on where you live??? Any way I've learned my lesson (as others stated) you won't answer any direct question. Have a Goat fucking great day Thats ok.. but sorry I am not into fucking goats... I will leave that to the guys who dig that sort of thing.... I wonder what the stats show for the amount of goats in red states.. as opposed to blue states. It appears that there would be far more farm animals for the red staters to have their way with. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mirage62 0 #206 August 29, 2011 Have a Goat fucking great dayKevin Keenan is my hero, a double FUP, he does so much with so little Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #207 August 29, 2011 QuoteHave a Goat fucking great day Guys all over the RED STATES.. probably are http://www.luresext.edu/goats/library/meatgoatmap10.htm And sheep from Wiki Answers What are the top sheep producing us states? Answer 1. Texas 2. Tennessee 3. Georgia 4. Oklahoma 5. Kentucky 6. North Carolina 7. California 8. South Carolina 9. Alabama 10. Florida BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #209 August 29, 2011 QuoteCalifornia? Hey its a big state.. with a whole lot of "conservative" kinda folks over them thar mountains. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #210 August 29, 2011 just seems like your list is more a reflection of large states with the weather and inclination to raise animals. If you looked up for cows instead, may be the same list. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #211 November 21, 2011 QuoteThat worries Rep. David Camp, R-Mich., chairman of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee, and a member of the House-Senate supercommittee tasked with finding new deficit cuts. Tax reductions, "no matter how well-intended," will push the deficit higher, making the panel's task that much harder, Camp's office said. Nice. Give tax breaks to the oil companies and corporate America. Give tax breaks to the "job creators". I wonder why Obama can't get America back to work over night? Geez, all of those job creators must be failing at their jobs. Well, let's see some creating! Looks like the folks with the 9% approval rating just don't get it. www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/11/the-supercommittee-and-a-neverending-cycle-of-dysfunction/248800/?google_editors_picks=true... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites