Kimbo 0 #1 August 2, 2011 I don't normally post, however can someone please tell me why the Obama Regime would have Gabrielle Gifford vote on the debt limit deal for no other reason than exploiting her vote for the bleeding heart liberal benifit. From everything I've read in Arizona, she's is not qualified to vote at this time. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SStewart 13 #2 August 2, 2011 Most of those clowns are not qualified to vote on anything but that does not stop them. I thought it was nice to see her recover and get back to work. Her single vote did not change the outcome. It seems kinda petty to begrudge her return after being shot in the head.Onward and Upward! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kd5xb 1 #3 August 2, 2011 I agree with SStewart -- I don't care which side of the aisle she is on, I'm just glad to see her battling back from where that punk put her.I'm a jumper. Even though I don't always have money for jumps, and may not ever own a rig again, I'll always be a jumper. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
labrys 0 #4 August 2, 2011 Quote I don't normally post, however can someone please tell me why the Obama Regime would have Gabrielle Gifford vote on the debt limit deal for no other reason than exploiting her vote for the bleeding heart liberal benifit. From everything I've read in Arizona, she's is not qualified to vote at this time. And you know these things how? Sounds like you're putting opinionated spin on something that had to happen eventually... unless you'd prefer that she never returned to work. Owned by Remi #? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #5 August 2, 2011 I will mail you a case of kittens. Eat as many as you like. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #6 August 2, 2011 QuoteQuoteI don't normally post, however can someone please tell me why the Obama Regime would have Gabrielle Gifford vote on the debt limit deal for no other reason than exploiting her vote for the bleeding heart liberal benifit. From everything I've read in Arizona, she's is not qualified to vote at this time. Obama regime? that's real original, you folks crack me up, gee I wonder who taught you that one. Qualified? She is an elected member of Congress. It wasn't like they needed her vote, but it's good to see she's pissing off some ditto heads. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanJohnson 0 #7 August 2, 2011 ***, she's is not qualified to vote at this time. And you know these things how?Quote She's not qualified. She's a woman! Repeat after me , 1) all women are crazy. 2) some are crazier than others. 3) if you ever believe that you've met a real peach, an exception to rules number 1 and 2.., THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS TO RULES 1 AND 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,120 #8 August 2, 2011 >From everything I've read in Arizona, she's is not qualified to vote at this time. Fortunately, representatives are not disqualified based on your dislike of their politics or your hatred of the president. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites quade 4 #9 August 2, 2011 QuoteI don't normally post, however can someone please tell me why the Obama Regime would have Gabrielle Gifford vote on the debt limit deal for no other reason than exploiting her vote for the bleeding heart liberal benifit. From everything I've read in Arizona, she's is not qualified to vote at this time. Holy crap dude. If a US Congressman gets shot IN THE FACE just for being a representative of our elected government and wants to walk under their own power back on to the floor for any reason and at any time . . . uh . . . ya kinda gotta let them do it and be gracious enough to not bitch about it pretty much whatever your political beliefs are. FFS. I had thought I'd seen come class A-1 whining and moaning in my day, but the original post of this thread really does take the cake.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites skymiles 3 #10 August 2, 2011 Disgraceful Kimbo. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites tkhayes 348 #11 August 2, 2011 hmm, I thought she was a Congresswoman, and therefor she is/was expected to vote.....? no? does congress operate in some new way now that we have not heard of? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #12 August 2, 2011 Quote hmm, I thought she was a Congresswoman, and therefor she is/was expected to vote.....? no? does congress operate in some new way now that we have not heard of? With the Tea Baggers there... yes.... yes it does Basically it is broken beyond repair Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites tkhayes 348 #13 August 2, 2011 we, Ok you got me there, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #14 August 2, 2011 QuoteI don't normally post, however can someone please tell me why the Obama Regime would have Gabrielle Gifford vote on the debt limit deal for no other reason than exploiting her vote for the bleeding heart liberal benifit. From everything I've read in Arizona, she's is not qualified to vote at this time. If they brought in a comatose patient on a gurney to vote on a new gun control bill, I could see the argument, but I see nothing about her presence and vote on this to suggest this. In fact, given that a lot of Representatives would prefer not to go on the record, it seems more likely that either 1) she was feeling better and eager to return in a public way or 2) given the sympathy that voters will likely give to her next November, she was a sure yes vote to help get it passed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites ChrisL 2 #15 August 2, 2011 Quote From everything I've read in Arizona, she's is not qualified to vote at this time. You have information that indicates she has some cognitive impairment?__ My mighty steed Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Kimbo 0 #16 August 2, 2011 She hasn't set one foot into her own office in Arizona or Washington, and she has not givin an on camera interview. I don't think she's qualified to do her job! If her doctors say she's fully recoverd and able to return to work, then by all means let her vote. I don't see that. I don't care if she's a Rep. or Dem., if she's not capable of doing her job, for what ever reason, she should have been replaced bynow. But our system is so screwed up that no body wants to bring that up because they're afraid of offending someone. If she worked for me, and was not able to do her job, I would have to replace her. "The good of the many out weight the good of the few". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Andy9o8 2 #17 August 2, 2011 So you have no evidence aside from the conclusions of the right-wing blogosphere. Got it. OK, moving along. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,120 #18 August 2, 2011 >She hasn't set one foot into her own office in Arizona or Washington, and she has not >givin an on camera interview. I don't think she's qualified to do her job! This reminds me of the Terry Schiavo case, where Bill Frist "diagnosed" her for political gain without ever having seen her firsthand. It's remarkable what amazing diagnosticians republicans become when the diagnosis helps their political causes. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites lawrocket 3 #19 August 2, 2011 QuoteIt's remarkable what amazing diagnosticians republicans become when the diagnosis helps their political causes. The biggest shame is that both sides do it. Now it's the Republican doing it. The Democrat will be up next. I agree that the initial post lacks class. But it's no different from other classless acts for political with hunting. Think back to blaming tea partiers for her shooting. It's too bad that Giffords was made to be so polarizing. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #20 August 2, 2011 QuoteShe hasn't set one foot into her own office in Arizona or Washington, and she has not givin an on camera interview. I don't think she's qualified to do her job! If her doctors say she's fully recoverd and able to return to work, then by all means let her vote. I don't see that. Did you ask them? Your qualifications for voting are curious. No legislator can vote from her office, so visiting it seems besides the point. And giving interviews has even less relevance. Unlike the President, members of Congress are generally not replaced when they're out with a recoverable illness. They're just absent. There are 435 of them, so it's not like the process will grind to a halt without them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites winsor 236 #21 August 2, 2011 Quote>She hasn't set one foot into her own office in Arizona or Washington, and she has not >givin an on camera interview. I don't think she's qualified to do her job! This reminds me of the Terry Schiavo case, where Bill Frist "diagnosed" her for political gain without ever having seen her firsthand. It's remarkable what amazing diagnosticians republicans become when the diagnosis helps their political causes. Okay, we get it. Republicans = bad. Conservatives = bad. Criticizing Liberals & Democrats simply displays ignorance. Gotcha. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #22 August 2, 2011 Quote for no other reason than exploiting her vote which way did she vote? (I suspect either party will exploit whatever they can for public relations - including a damaged congressmember like her. But, as an individual, maybe she just wanted to visit work and show she was ok - or even, maybe, she really wanted to vote on this one. whatever the motivation - as a PR move, this was an excellent choice regardless of whether her own staff choreographed it, or the DFL leaders, or even the "obama regime" {that sounds as silly as when the other guys were screaming Bush regime}) ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Erroll 80 #23 August 3, 2011 From your first post: Quote...no other reason than exploiting her vote for the bleeding heart liberal benifit From your second post: QuoteI don't care if she's a Rep. or Dem., Really? After seeing the rousing standing ovation Ms Giffords received from both sides of the aisle, I'd suggest that your classless post will not get much support. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Remster 30 #24 August 3, 2011 Quote which way did she vote? She voted with the majority of Republicans .Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,151 #25 August 3, 2011 Quote Quote which way did she vote? She voted with the majority of Republicans . Quote "Can someone please tell me why the GOP would have Gabrielle Gifford vote on the debt limit deal for no other reason than exploiting her vote for the grasping conservatives' benefit." Minor changes for accuracy.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
billvon 3,120 #8 August 2, 2011 >From everything I've read in Arizona, she's is not qualified to vote at this time. Fortunately, representatives are not disqualified based on your dislike of their politics or your hatred of the president. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #9 August 2, 2011 QuoteI don't normally post, however can someone please tell me why the Obama Regime would have Gabrielle Gifford vote on the debt limit deal for no other reason than exploiting her vote for the bleeding heart liberal benifit. From everything I've read in Arizona, she's is not qualified to vote at this time. Holy crap dude. If a US Congressman gets shot IN THE FACE just for being a representative of our elected government and wants to walk under their own power back on to the floor for any reason and at any time . . . uh . . . ya kinda gotta let them do it and be gracious enough to not bitch about it pretty much whatever your political beliefs are. FFS. I had thought I'd seen come class A-1 whining and moaning in my day, but the original post of this thread really does take the cake.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skymiles 3 #10 August 2, 2011 Disgraceful Kimbo. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tkhayes 348 #11 August 2, 2011 hmm, I thought she was a Congresswoman, and therefor she is/was expected to vote.....? no? does congress operate in some new way now that we have not heard of? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #12 August 2, 2011 Quote hmm, I thought she was a Congresswoman, and therefor she is/was expected to vote.....? no? does congress operate in some new way now that we have not heard of? With the Tea Baggers there... yes.... yes it does Basically it is broken beyond repair Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tkhayes 348 #13 August 2, 2011 we, Ok you got me there, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #14 August 2, 2011 QuoteI don't normally post, however can someone please tell me why the Obama Regime would have Gabrielle Gifford vote on the debt limit deal for no other reason than exploiting her vote for the bleeding heart liberal benifit. From everything I've read in Arizona, she's is not qualified to vote at this time. If they brought in a comatose patient on a gurney to vote on a new gun control bill, I could see the argument, but I see nothing about her presence and vote on this to suggest this. In fact, given that a lot of Representatives would prefer not to go on the record, it seems more likely that either 1) she was feeling better and eager to return in a public way or 2) given the sympathy that voters will likely give to her next November, she was a sure yes vote to help get it passed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisL 2 #15 August 2, 2011 Quote From everything I've read in Arizona, she's is not qualified to vote at this time. You have information that indicates she has some cognitive impairment?__ My mighty steed Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kimbo 0 #16 August 2, 2011 She hasn't set one foot into her own office in Arizona or Washington, and she has not givin an on camera interview. I don't think she's qualified to do her job! If her doctors say she's fully recoverd and able to return to work, then by all means let her vote. I don't see that. I don't care if she's a Rep. or Dem., if she's not capable of doing her job, for what ever reason, she should have been replaced bynow. But our system is so screwed up that no body wants to bring that up because they're afraid of offending someone. If she worked for me, and was not able to do her job, I would have to replace her. "The good of the many out weight the good of the few". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #17 August 2, 2011 So you have no evidence aside from the conclusions of the right-wing blogosphere. Got it. OK, moving along. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #18 August 2, 2011 >She hasn't set one foot into her own office in Arizona or Washington, and she has not >givin an on camera interview. I don't think she's qualified to do her job! This reminds me of the Terry Schiavo case, where Bill Frist "diagnosed" her for political gain without ever having seen her firsthand. It's remarkable what amazing diagnosticians republicans become when the diagnosis helps their political causes. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #19 August 2, 2011 QuoteIt's remarkable what amazing diagnosticians republicans become when the diagnosis helps their political causes. The biggest shame is that both sides do it. Now it's the Republican doing it. The Democrat will be up next. I agree that the initial post lacks class. But it's no different from other classless acts for political with hunting. Think back to blaming tea partiers for her shooting. It's too bad that Giffords was made to be so polarizing. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #20 August 2, 2011 QuoteShe hasn't set one foot into her own office in Arizona or Washington, and she has not givin an on camera interview. I don't think she's qualified to do her job! If her doctors say she's fully recoverd and able to return to work, then by all means let her vote. I don't see that. Did you ask them? Your qualifications for voting are curious. No legislator can vote from her office, so visiting it seems besides the point. And giving interviews has even less relevance. Unlike the President, members of Congress are generally not replaced when they're out with a recoverable illness. They're just absent. There are 435 of them, so it's not like the process will grind to a halt without them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #21 August 2, 2011 Quote>She hasn't set one foot into her own office in Arizona or Washington, and she has not >givin an on camera interview. I don't think she's qualified to do her job! This reminds me of the Terry Schiavo case, where Bill Frist "diagnosed" her for political gain without ever having seen her firsthand. It's remarkable what amazing diagnosticians republicans become when the diagnosis helps their political causes. Okay, we get it. Republicans = bad. Conservatives = bad. Criticizing Liberals & Democrats simply displays ignorance. Gotcha. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #22 August 2, 2011 Quote for no other reason than exploiting her vote which way did she vote? (I suspect either party will exploit whatever they can for public relations - including a damaged congressmember like her. But, as an individual, maybe she just wanted to visit work and show she was ok - or even, maybe, she really wanted to vote on this one. whatever the motivation - as a PR move, this was an excellent choice regardless of whether her own staff choreographed it, or the DFL leaders, or even the "obama regime" {that sounds as silly as when the other guys were screaming Bush regime}) ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Erroll 80 #23 August 3, 2011 From your first post: Quote...no other reason than exploiting her vote for the bleeding heart liberal benifit From your second post: QuoteI don't care if she's a Rep. or Dem., Really? After seeing the rousing standing ovation Ms Giffords received from both sides of the aisle, I'd suggest that your classless post will not get much support. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #24 August 3, 2011 Quote which way did she vote? She voted with the majority of Republicans .Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,151 #25 August 3, 2011 Quote Quote which way did she vote? She voted with the majority of Republicans . Quote "Can someone please tell me why the GOP would have Gabrielle Gifford vote on the debt limit deal for no other reason than exploiting her vote for the grasping conservatives' benefit." Minor changes for accuracy.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
