0
Gravitymaster

Which V.P. was/is the bigger Dunce?

Recommended Posts

First, could you explain how you whittled down your list to these two?

If you could remember as far back as Quayle, how could you forget that Cheney shot someone in the face? At least Cheney didn't shoot and kill a founding father like Aaron Burr did! Granted it was a duel, but damn it was Alexander-freaking-Hamilton!

What about Spiro Agnew? How many VPs resignations for taking bribes was a comical foreshadowing of his President's later resignation?

Talk about going from great to complete failure, Abraham Lincoln may have been a tough act to follow but could any VP have done any worse than the impeached Andrew Johnson did? Clearly, Lincoln's strategy in selecting Johnson as VP depended on Johnson never becoming President! Damn you John Wilkes Booth!

And of course, how could we ever forget Henry Wallace? Oh wait, we did forget about him thanks to FDR dumping him as VP before the 1944 election in favor of Harry S. Truman!

And finally, the great John C. Calhoun who not only served as VP twice, but once for each of two Presidents [Adams, Jackson] who ran against each other in two elections. Calhoun was so horrible, Jackson finally forced him to resign stating that he regretted not having him put to death as a traitor. Not to mention, much of the cause of The Civil War can be attributed to him.

Dan Quayle and Joseph Biden are small potatoes/potatos compared to some of the VPs who have held office, let alone, some of the ones who have only been nominated, Sarah [cough] Palin!
It's all been said before, no sense repeating it here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

First, explain how you whittled down your list to these two?

If you could remember as far back as Quayle, how could you forget that Cheney shot someone in the face? At least Cheney didn't shoot and kill a founding father, Aaron Burr did! Granted it was a duel, but damn it was Alexander-freaking-Hamilton!

What about Spiro Agnew? How many VPs resignations for taking bribes would be a comical foreshadowing of his President's [Nixon] later resignation?

Talk about going from great to complete failure, Abraham Lincoln may have been a tough act to follow but could any VP have done any worse than the impeached Andrew Johnson did? Clearly, Lincoln's strategy in selecting Johnson as VP depended on Johnson never becoming President! Damn you John Wilkes Booth!

And of course, how could we ever forget Henry Wallace? Oh wait, we did forget about him thanks to FDR for dumping him as VP before the 1944 election in favor of Harry S. Truman!

And finally, the great John C. Calhoun who not only served as VP twice, but once for each of two Presidents [Adams, Jackson] who ran against each other in two elections. Calhoun was so horrible, Jackson finally forced him to resign stating that he regretted not having him put to death as a traitor. Not to mention, much of the cause of The Civil War can be attributed to him.

Dan Quayle and Joseph Biden are small potatoes/potatos compared to some of the VPs who have held office, let alone, some of the ones who have only been nominated, Sarah [cough] Palin!



Excellent post and a nice historical summation. I was in the process of writing a similar recap of VPs, but got interrupted, came back, saw this and said to myself, "why bother? This one's awesome!"
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Because it's my poll and I'm not interested in which VP in history was the biggest dunce. I just want to know who it is between these two. You'll notice I didn't include Al Gore either.

So far, Biden is pitching a shut out.



Oh, so it's a Rhetorical Poll?
It's all been said before, no sense repeating it here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Oh, so it's a Rhetorical Poll?



Whoa, whoa, whoa. Slow down there, William Faulkner!

You didn't really expect this crowd to know what "rhetorical" means; did you?



yeah, really, you elitist bastards in your ivory tower using all them big words and historical "facts". Damn, think about us normal people for once!
Never meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>So far, Biden is pitching a shut out.
And Quayle pulls ahead!
Overall I must say Quayle was a lot more amusing. Biden is sort of . . . boring.



Probably because, even with all his faults, Biden probably knows the difference real humans from TV sitcom characters. I mean, come on, when a guy like Quayle is so dumb he tries to have a public debate with a sitcom character, it's a little hard to top.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Oh, so it's a Rhetorical Poll?



Whoa, whoa, whoa. Slow down there, William Faulkner!

You didn't really expect this crowd to know what "rhetorical" means; did you?



Is "oxymoron" too big of a word? Or will someone just think I'm name calling?

As in, "Rhetorical Poll" is an oxymoron, isn't it?
It's all been said before, no sense repeating it here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Oh, so it's a Rhetorical Poll?



Whoa, whoa, whoa. Slow down there, William Faulkner!

You didn't really expect this crowd to know what "rhetorical" means; did you?



I gotta say it does not surprise me that YOU think that many do not know what the word means

Typical liberal thought process

Liberals think themselves so superior

Great example

Thanks
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Oh, so it's a Rhetorical Poll?

You didn't really expect this crowd to know what "rhetorical" means; did you?



You'll probably have to explain that both of these are rhetorical questions.
It's all been said before, no sense repeating it here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Aaron Burr, John Calhoun, Henry Wallace and (yes) Spiro Agnew were all very intelligent. Not hardly dunces at all. Intellectually, Calhoun was the equal of Adams and the superior of Jackson. And Wallace, albeit a bit of a whack job, was far more an intellectual than FDR ever was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Aaron Burr, John Calhoun, Henry Wallace and (yes) Spiro Agnew were all very intelligent. Not hardly dunces at all. Intellectually, Calhoun was the equal of Adams and the superior of Jackson. And Wallace, albeit a bit of a whack job, was far more an intellectual than FDR ever was.



Which, of course, brings us back to Sarah Palin.

Why the hell is she still relevant?
It's all been said before, no sense repeating it here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Aaron Burr, John Calhoun, Henry Wallace and (yes) Spiro Agnew were all very intelligent. Not hardly dunces at all. Intellectually, Calhoun was the equal of Adams and the superior of Jackson. And Wallace, albeit a bit of a whack job, was far more an intellectual than FDR ever was.



Which, of course, brings us back to Sarah Palin.

Why the hell is she still relevant?



Partly because sexists who secretly consider themselves superior to women, look for every chance they can find to tear her down. The feeble minded have bought into the media image that's been created.

Reagans a dim-wit, George HW Bush is a wimp, Clintons a genius, George W. Bush is an idiot, Obama is the second coming, Palin's an idiot.

Starting to see a pattern?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Aaron Burr, John Calhoun, Henry Wallace and (yes) Spiro Agnew were all very intelligent. Not hardly dunces at all. Intellectually, Calhoun was the equal of Adams and the superior of Jackson. And Wallace, albeit a bit of a whack job, was far more an intellectual than FDR ever was.



Which, of course, brings us back to Sarah Palin.

Why the hell is she still relevant?



Partly because sexists who secretly consider themselves superior to women, look for every chance they can find to tear her down. The feeble minded have bought into the media image that's been created.

Reagans a dim-wit, George HW Bush is a wimp, Clintons a genius, George W. Bush is an idiot, Obama is the second coming, Palin's an idiot.

Starting to see a pattern?




Yes rePUBIClowns.. hate anyone smarter than them sefs and will not nominate nor elect anyone with half a fucking brain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Reagans a dim-wit, George HW Bush is a wimp, Clintons a genius, George W. Bush is an idiot, Obama is the second coming, Palin's an idiot.



I mostly agree with two of those.

Blues,
Dave
"I AM A PROFESSIONAL EXTREME ATHLETE!"
(drink Mountain Dew)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Partly because sexists who secretly consider themselves superior to women, look for every chance they can find to tear her down. The feeble minded have bought into the media image that's been created.



Eye-roll of the day winner.

- Dan G

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0