billvon 3,096 #51 July 13, 2011 >this is Obama's economy The economy will recover as it always does. When it does, it will be fun to see you post "Obama has NOTHING TO DO with the economy!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hwt 0 #52 July 13, 2011 Quote Quote . Enjoy the video.http://video.foxnews.com/v/991352947001/obama-laughing-off-dismal-economy/ This Public Disservice Announcement brought to you by the not so fair and balanced propaganda arm of NewsCorp Inc. Your comment made me laugh... That is exactly what George Soros would say. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hwt 0 #53 July 13, 2011 Quote >this is Obama's economy The economy will recover as it always does. When it does, it will be fun to see you post "Obama has NOTHING TO DO with the economy!" I will remember this statement because i do not believe the economy will return "as it always has".. There has been too much interference by Obama. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 334 #54 July 13, 2011 Quote ... That is exactly what George Soros would say. Your comment made me laugh. That is exactly what Glen Beck would say. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 334 #55 July 13, 2011 Back in the day, a good cardboard box was available in most dumpsters. That was trickle down prosperity. Not anymore. Try finding a good cardboard box these days. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #56 July 13, 2011 If you're going to try to be witty, your comment has to at least make some sense. It's like you're telling the punchline to the wrong joke. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,096 #57 July 13, 2011 >It's like you're telling the punchline to the wrong joke. That's what she said. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #58 July 13, 2011 Quote Quote ... That is exactly what George Soros would say. Your comment made me laugh. That is exactly what Glen Beck would say. Actually I think that is the kind of comment that their hero Jeff Gannon would come up with. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #59 July 13, 2011 Quote"This is not just a matter of Social Security checks," Obama also told CBS News. "These are veterans' checks; these are folks on disability and their checks. There are about 70 million checks that go out." 70 million checks! The U.S. has a population of about 300 million. Children under age 18 comprise about 20% of that total, so that leaves 240 million adults. And of those, 70 million get a government check each month? In other words, 30% of all adults get some kind of government check each month, nearly one out of every three! And then add to that situation the fact that 51% of Americans pay no income taxes. I think I see part of the budget problem here... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,096 #60 July 13, 2011 >I think I see part of the budget problem here... Send out fewer checks, you say? Why, I think you're agreeing with Obama here! A big day here in SC . . . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanJohnson 0 #61 July 13, 2011 Quote>The Democrats want And the republicans want Republicans /Democrats are just labels created to confuse the masses. When was the last time one of these parties was in control of the government and things got better for the common man? When Congress talks about major tax hikes on the wealthy you can bet money that it's all talk. Won't ever happen. Reason being they are all wealthy and they ain't gonna raise their own taxes. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #62 July 14, 2011 Quote >It's like you're telling the punchline to the wrong joke. That's what she said. Gotta love the games you children playOh the incense."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,096 #63 July 14, 2011 >Republicans /Democrats are just labels created to confuse the masses. While I think THEY believe there's a difference, there really isn't much of one any more. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,096 #64 July 14, 2011 >Gotta love the games you children play "May I ask how you dealt with the test?" "You may ask." (pause) "That was a little joke." "Humor, it is a difficult concept. It is not logical." "We learn by doing." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DanJohnson 0 #65 July 14, 2011 Quote>Republicans /Democrats are just labels created to confuse the masses. While I think THEY believe there's a difference, there really isn't much of one any more. Sadly it is my opinion that not one member of Congress would vote for a Bill which would better the lives of millions if that Bill was detrimental to the congress persons own wealth or well being. We don't have Statesmen anymore. We have *politicians* in Congress. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #66 July 14, 2011 "We learn by doing." Maybe you should do more"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #62 July 14, 2011 Quote >It's like you're telling the punchline to the wrong joke. That's what she said. Gotta love the games you children playOh the incense."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,096 #63 July 14, 2011 >Republicans /Democrats are just labels created to confuse the masses. While I think THEY believe there's a difference, there really isn't much of one any more. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,096 #64 July 14, 2011 >Gotta love the games you children play "May I ask how you dealt with the test?" "You may ask." (pause) "That was a little joke." "Humor, it is a difficult concept. It is not logical." "We learn by doing." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanJohnson 0 #65 July 14, 2011 Quote>Republicans /Democrats are just labels created to confuse the masses. While I think THEY believe there's a difference, there really isn't much of one any more. Sadly it is my opinion that not one member of Congress would vote for a Bill which would better the lives of millions if that Bill was detrimental to the congress persons own wealth or well being. We don't have Statesmen anymore. We have *politicians* in Congress. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #66 July 14, 2011 "We learn by doing." Maybe you should do more"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #67 July 14, 2011 QuoteQuote>Republicans /Democrats are just labels created to confuse the masses. While I think THEY believe there's a difference, there really isn't much of one any more. Sadly it is my opinion that not one member of Congress would vote for a Bill which would better the lives of millions if that Bill was detrimental to the congress persons own wealth or well being. We don't have Statesmen anymore. We have *politicians* in Congress. +1"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,096 #68 July 14, 2011 >Sadly it is my opinion that not one member of Congress would vote for a Bill which >would better the lives of millions if that Bill was detrimental to the congress persons >own wealth or well being. I disagree. I think 80% would. But you never hear about them. You hear about Obama, Reid, Bachmann, Palin. You hear about the people making a name for themselves by attacking others. You hear attacks on other politicians, and with our news media today, you only hear the worst of the worst attacks. You never hear about the changes to diesel fuel requirements that results in cleaner air in cities, or the laws that prevent spurious DNA testing by law enforcement, or that regulate when they can track your cellphone. You only hear about the evil healthcare law, or the time that Bachmann voted to kill kids. Our media has become a big reality TV show, and like any reality TV show, the millions of man-hours the government spends running things like the CDC, the FAA and military gets condensed to ten second sound bites. And you can bet they will be the most viewer-attention-grabbing sound bites they can possibly get, so that the viewer doesn't switch from FOX News to American Idol. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #69 July 14, 2011 Quote>Sadly it is my opinion that not one member of Congress would vote for a Bill which >would better the lives of millions if that Bill was detrimental to the congress persons >own wealth or well being. I disagree. I think 80% would. But you never hear about them. You hear about Obama, Reid, Bachmann, Palin. You hear about the people making a name for themselves by attacking others. You hear attacks on other politicians, and with our news media today, you only hear the worst of the worst attacks. You never hear about the changes to diesel fuel requirements that results in cleaner air in cities, or the laws that prevent spurious DNA testing by law enforcement, or that regulate when they can track your cellphone. You only hear about the evil healthcare law, or the time that Bachmann voted to kill kids. Our media has become a big reality TV show, and like any reality TV show, the millions of man-hours the government spends running things like the CDC, the FAA and military gets condensed to ten second sound bites. And you can bet they will be the most viewer-attention-grabbing sound bites they can possibly get, so that the viewer doesn't switch from FOX News to American Idol. Sadly, they are out-numbered by the self-centered, attention seekers. What's really sad about the idea of dis-continuing Social security is the older segment of our society who paid into it all their working lives and now, that's all they have. It's what pays their bills and buys a little food... once a month. What are those people going to do if, in fact, Social Security is cut. Our wonderful politicians got us into the mess we are in and now, they want to rob what little some of our older Americans have. I'd be willing to bet, not one of those politicians would give-up so much as a martini to help those older Americans. Un-believable!!! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanJohnson 0 #70 July 14, 2011 Quote>Sadly it is my opinion that not one member of Congress would vote for a Bill which >would better the lives of millions if that Bill was detrimental to the congress persons >own wealth or well being. I disagree. I think 80% would. Quote If 80% would we wouldn't be in the predicament we are in. 80% didn't !!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #71 July 14, 2011 Quote Quote >Sadly it is my opinion that not one member of Congress would vote for a Bill which >would better the lives of millions if that Bill was detrimental to the congress persons >own wealth or well being. I disagree. I think 80% would. But you never hear about them. You hear about Obama, Reid, Bachmann, Palin. You hear about the people making a name for themselves by attacking others. You hear attacks on other politicians, and with our news media today, you only hear the worst of the worst attacks. You never hear about the changes to diesel fuel requirements that results in cleaner air in cities, or the laws that prevent spurious DNA testing by law enforcement, or that regulate when they can track your cellphone. You only hear about the evil healthcare law, or the time that Bachmann voted to kill kids. Our media has become a big reality TV show, and like any reality TV show, the millions of man-hours the government spends running things like the CDC, the FAA and military gets condensed to ten second sound bites. And you can bet they will be the most viewer-attention-grabbing sound bites they can possibly get, so that the viewer doesn't switch from FOX News to American Idol. Sadly, they are out-numbered by the self-centered, attention seekers. What's really sad about the idea of dis-continuing Social security is the older segment of our society who paid into it all their working lives and now, that's all they have. It's what pays their bills and buys a little food... once a month. What are those people going to do if, in fact, Social Security is cut. Our wonderful politicians got us into the mess we are in and now, they want to rob what little some of our older Americans have. I'd be willing to bet, not one of those politicians would give-up so much as a martini to help those older Americans. Un-believable!!! Chuck Hey.. as long as they are still getting their personal TRICKLE..so they can stay at the pig trough.. they will be right there making sure the FLOOD of government money keeps flowing to the malevolent masters who bought and paid for them. We the people is a dead concept... when corporations can spend as much as they want to buy the people we are supposedly electing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DanJohnson 0 #72 July 14, 2011 Quote. Our wonderful politicians got us into the mess we are in and now, Quote Wait a second there , Chuck . All the blame can't be transfered so neatly to the "wonderful politicians". Who voted 'em in? Don't the voters ultimately bare the burden of responsibility? Are you a voter? Isn't this partially your responsibility? Are you trying to shirk your responsibility by blaming "the wonderful politicians"? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterrig 1 #73 July 14, 2011 Quote Quote Quote >Sadly it is my opinion that not one member of Congress would vote for a Bill which >would better the lives of millions if that Bill was detrimental to the congress persons >own wealth or well being. I disagree. I think 80% would. But you never hear about them. You hear about Obama, Reid, Bachmann, Palin. You hear about the people making a name for themselves by attacking others. You hear attacks on other politicians, and with our news media today, you only hear the worst of the worst attacks. You never hear about the changes to diesel fuel requirements that results in cleaner air in cities, or the laws that prevent spurious DNA testing by law enforcement, or that regulate when they can track your cellphone. You only hear about the evil healthcare law, or the time that Bachmann voted to kill kids. Our media has become a big reality TV show, and like any reality TV show, the millions of man-hours the government spends running things like the CDC, the FAA and military gets condensed to ten second sound bites. And you can bet they will be the most viewer-attention-grabbing sound bites they can possibly get, so that the viewer doesn't switch from FOX News to American Idol. Sadly, they are out-numbered by the self-centered, attention seekers. What's really sad about the idea of dis-continuing Social security is the older segment of our society who paid into it all their working lives and now, that's all they have. It's what pays their bills and buys a little food... once a month. What are those people going to do if, in fact, Social Security is cut. Our wonderful politicians got us into the mess we are in and now, they want to rob what little some of our older Americans have. I'd be willing to bet, not one of those politicians would give-up so much as a martini to help those older Americans. Un-believable!!! Chuck Hey.. as long as they are still getting their personal TRICKLE..so they can stay at the pig trough.. they will be right there making sure the FLOOD of government money keeps flowing to the malevolent masters who bought and paid for them. We the people is a dead concept... when corporations can spend as much as they want to buy the people we are supposedly electing. That's the truth! They don't really care about those folks who voted them in just so long as they get voted in. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterrig 1 #74 July 14, 2011 QuoteQuote. Our wonderful politicians got us into the mess we are in and now, Quote Wait a second there , Chuck . All the blame can't be transfered so neatly to the "wonderful politicians". Who voted 'em in? Don't the voters ultimately bare the burden of responsibility? Are you a voter? Isn't this partially your responsibility? Are you trying to shirk your responsibility by blaming "the wonderful politicians"? That isn't worthy of a response. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DanJohnson 0 #75 July 14, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuote. Our wonderful politicians got us into the mess we are in and now, Quote Wait a second there , Chuck . All the blame can't be transfered so neatly to the "wonderful politicians". Who voted 'em in? Don't the voters ultimately bare the burden of responsibility? Are you a voter? Isn't this partially your responsibility? Are you trying to shirk your responsibility by blaming "the wonderful politicians"? That isn't worthy of a response. Chuck I didn't expect you'ld man up and accept any responsibility. It's easy to point the finger Chuck. "it's those politicions fault!!" The true fact is, Chuck, the voters picked those "politicions" for office! The voters, the Citizenry, can only blame themselves for our current crisis. So how do we solve the problems we are currently facing? Do we vote in more "politicions" or do we scrap this government through peaceful revolution as has been exampled all over the world of late, and start over? Do we default on the debt? Whose debt is it Chuck? Is it yours and mine or does it belong to those "wonderful politicians" we elected to office? C'mon Chuck, you've attempted to place the blame at the feet of others although it is evident that you are at least partially to blame. Don't run and hide. Accept your portion of blame and then we can move forward toward solutions! What say you? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Page 3 of 6 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing × Sign In Sign Up Forums Dropzones Classifieds Gear Indoor Articles Photos Videos Calendar Stolen Fatalities Subscriptions Leaderboard Activity Back Activity All Activity My Activity Streams Unread Content Content I Started
Amazon 7 #71 July 14, 2011 Quote Quote >Sadly it is my opinion that not one member of Congress would vote for a Bill which >would better the lives of millions if that Bill was detrimental to the congress persons >own wealth or well being. I disagree. I think 80% would. But you never hear about them. You hear about Obama, Reid, Bachmann, Palin. You hear about the people making a name for themselves by attacking others. You hear attacks on other politicians, and with our news media today, you only hear the worst of the worst attacks. You never hear about the changes to diesel fuel requirements that results in cleaner air in cities, or the laws that prevent spurious DNA testing by law enforcement, or that regulate when they can track your cellphone. You only hear about the evil healthcare law, or the time that Bachmann voted to kill kids. Our media has become a big reality TV show, and like any reality TV show, the millions of man-hours the government spends running things like the CDC, the FAA and military gets condensed to ten second sound bites. And you can bet they will be the most viewer-attention-grabbing sound bites they can possibly get, so that the viewer doesn't switch from FOX News to American Idol. Sadly, they are out-numbered by the self-centered, attention seekers. What's really sad about the idea of dis-continuing Social security is the older segment of our society who paid into it all their working lives and now, that's all they have. It's what pays their bills and buys a little food... once a month. What are those people going to do if, in fact, Social Security is cut. Our wonderful politicians got us into the mess we are in and now, they want to rob what little some of our older Americans have. I'd be willing to bet, not one of those politicians would give-up so much as a martini to help those older Americans. Un-believable!!! Chuck Hey.. as long as they are still getting their personal TRICKLE..so they can stay at the pig trough.. they will be right there making sure the FLOOD of government money keeps flowing to the malevolent masters who bought and paid for them. We the people is a dead concept... when corporations can spend as much as they want to buy the people we are supposedly electing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanJohnson 0 #72 July 14, 2011 Quote. Our wonderful politicians got us into the mess we are in and now, Quote Wait a second there , Chuck . All the blame can't be transfered so neatly to the "wonderful politicians". Who voted 'em in? Don't the voters ultimately bare the burden of responsibility? Are you a voter? Isn't this partially your responsibility? Are you trying to shirk your responsibility by blaming "the wonderful politicians"? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterrig 1 #73 July 14, 2011 Quote Quote Quote >Sadly it is my opinion that not one member of Congress would vote for a Bill which >would better the lives of millions if that Bill was detrimental to the congress persons >own wealth or well being. I disagree. I think 80% would. But you never hear about them. You hear about Obama, Reid, Bachmann, Palin. You hear about the people making a name for themselves by attacking others. You hear attacks on other politicians, and with our news media today, you only hear the worst of the worst attacks. You never hear about the changes to diesel fuel requirements that results in cleaner air in cities, or the laws that prevent spurious DNA testing by law enforcement, or that regulate when they can track your cellphone. You only hear about the evil healthcare law, or the time that Bachmann voted to kill kids. Our media has become a big reality TV show, and like any reality TV show, the millions of man-hours the government spends running things like the CDC, the FAA and military gets condensed to ten second sound bites. And you can bet they will be the most viewer-attention-grabbing sound bites they can possibly get, so that the viewer doesn't switch from FOX News to American Idol. Sadly, they are out-numbered by the self-centered, attention seekers. What's really sad about the idea of dis-continuing Social security is the older segment of our society who paid into it all their working lives and now, that's all they have. It's what pays their bills and buys a little food... once a month. What are those people going to do if, in fact, Social Security is cut. Our wonderful politicians got us into the mess we are in and now, they want to rob what little some of our older Americans have. I'd be willing to bet, not one of those politicians would give-up so much as a martini to help those older Americans. Un-believable!!! Chuck Hey.. as long as they are still getting their personal TRICKLE..so they can stay at the pig trough.. they will be right there making sure the FLOOD of government money keeps flowing to the malevolent masters who bought and paid for them. We the people is a dead concept... when corporations can spend as much as they want to buy the people we are supposedly electing. That's the truth! They don't really care about those folks who voted them in just so long as they get voted in. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterrig 1 #74 July 14, 2011 QuoteQuote. Our wonderful politicians got us into the mess we are in and now, Quote Wait a second there , Chuck . All the blame can't be transfered so neatly to the "wonderful politicians". Who voted 'em in? Don't the voters ultimately bare the burden of responsibility? Are you a voter? Isn't this partially your responsibility? Are you trying to shirk your responsibility by blaming "the wonderful politicians"? That isn't worthy of a response. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DanJohnson 0 #75 July 14, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuote. Our wonderful politicians got us into the mess we are in and now, Quote Wait a second there , Chuck . All the blame can't be transfered so neatly to the "wonderful politicians". Who voted 'em in? Don't the voters ultimately bare the burden of responsibility? Are you a voter? Isn't this partially your responsibility? Are you trying to shirk your responsibility by blaming "the wonderful politicians"? That isn't worthy of a response. Chuck I didn't expect you'ld man up and accept any responsibility. It's easy to point the finger Chuck. "it's those politicions fault!!" The true fact is, Chuck, the voters picked those "politicions" for office! The voters, the Citizenry, can only blame themselves for our current crisis. So how do we solve the problems we are currently facing? Do we vote in more "politicions" or do we scrap this government through peaceful revolution as has been exampled all over the world of late, and start over? Do we default on the debt? Whose debt is it Chuck? Is it yours and mine or does it belong to those "wonderful politicians" we elected to office? C'mon Chuck, you've attempted to place the blame at the feet of others although it is evident that you are at least partially to blame. Don't run and hide. Accept your portion of blame and then we can move forward toward solutions! What say you? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Page 3 of 6 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing × Sign In Sign Up Forums Dropzones Classifieds Gear Indoor Articles Photos Videos Calendar Stolen Fatalities Subscriptions Leaderboard Activity Back Activity All Activity My Activity Streams Unread Content Content I Started
masterrig 1 #73 July 14, 2011 Quote Quote Quote >Sadly it is my opinion that not one member of Congress would vote for a Bill which >would better the lives of millions if that Bill was detrimental to the congress persons >own wealth or well being. I disagree. I think 80% would. But you never hear about them. You hear about Obama, Reid, Bachmann, Palin. You hear about the people making a name for themselves by attacking others. You hear attacks on other politicians, and with our news media today, you only hear the worst of the worst attacks. You never hear about the changes to diesel fuel requirements that results in cleaner air in cities, or the laws that prevent spurious DNA testing by law enforcement, or that regulate when they can track your cellphone. You only hear about the evil healthcare law, or the time that Bachmann voted to kill kids. Our media has become a big reality TV show, and like any reality TV show, the millions of man-hours the government spends running things like the CDC, the FAA and military gets condensed to ten second sound bites. And you can bet they will be the most viewer-attention-grabbing sound bites they can possibly get, so that the viewer doesn't switch from FOX News to American Idol. Sadly, they are out-numbered by the self-centered, attention seekers. What's really sad about the idea of dis-continuing Social security is the older segment of our society who paid into it all their working lives and now, that's all they have. It's what pays their bills and buys a little food... once a month. What are those people going to do if, in fact, Social Security is cut. Our wonderful politicians got us into the mess we are in and now, they want to rob what little some of our older Americans have. I'd be willing to bet, not one of those politicians would give-up so much as a martini to help those older Americans. Un-believable!!! Chuck Hey.. as long as they are still getting their personal TRICKLE..so they can stay at the pig trough.. they will be right there making sure the FLOOD of government money keeps flowing to the malevolent masters who bought and paid for them. We the people is a dead concept... when corporations can spend as much as they want to buy the people we are supposedly electing. That's the truth! They don't really care about those folks who voted them in just so long as they get voted in. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #74 July 14, 2011 QuoteQuote. Our wonderful politicians got us into the mess we are in and now, Quote Wait a second there , Chuck . All the blame can't be transfered so neatly to the "wonderful politicians". Who voted 'em in? Don't the voters ultimately bare the burden of responsibility? Are you a voter? Isn't this partially your responsibility? Are you trying to shirk your responsibility by blaming "the wonderful politicians"? That isn't worthy of a response. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DanJohnson 0 #75 July 14, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuote. Our wonderful politicians got us into the mess we are in and now, Quote Wait a second there , Chuck . All the blame can't be transfered so neatly to the "wonderful politicians". Who voted 'em in? Don't the voters ultimately bare the burden of responsibility? Are you a voter? Isn't this partially your responsibility? Are you trying to shirk your responsibility by blaming "the wonderful politicians"? That isn't worthy of a response. Chuck I didn't expect you'ld man up and accept any responsibility. It's easy to point the finger Chuck. "it's those politicions fault!!" The true fact is, Chuck, the voters picked those "politicions" for office! The voters, the Citizenry, can only blame themselves for our current crisis. So how do we solve the problems we are currently facing? Do we vote in more "politicions" or do we scrap this government through peaceful revolution as has been exampled all over the world of late, and start over? Do we default on the debt? Whose debt is it Chuck? Is it yours and mine or does it belong to those "wonderful politicians" we elected to office? C'mon Chuck, you've attempted to place the blame at the feet of others although it is evident that you are at least partially to blame. Don't run and hide. Accept your portion of blame and then we can move forward toward solutions! What say you? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Page 3 of 6 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
DanJohnson 0 #75 July 14, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuote. Our wonderful politicians got us into the mess we are in and now, Quote Wait a second there , Chuck . All the blame can't be transfered so neatly to the "wonderful politicians". Who voted 'em in? Don't the voters ultimately bare the burden of responsibility? Are you a voter? Isn't this partially your responsibility? Are you trying to shirk your responsibility by blaming "the wonderful politicians"? That isn't worthy of a response. Chuck I didn't expect you'ld man up and accept any responsibility. It's easy to point the finger Chuck. "it's those politicions fault!!" The true fact is, Chuck, the voters picked those "politicions" for office! The voters, the Citizenry, can only blame themselves for our current crisis. So how do we solve the problems we are currently facing? Do we vote in more "politicions" or do we scrap this government through peaceful revolution as has been exampled all over the world of late, and start over? Do we default on the debt? Whose debt is it Chuck? Is it yours and mine or does it belong to those "wonderful politicians" we elected to office? C'mon Chuck, you've attempted to place the blame at the feet of others although it is evident that you are at least partially to blame. Don't run and hide. Accept your portion of blame and then we can move forward toward solutions! What say you? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Page 3 of 6 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
