High School Student Stands Up Against Prayer at Public School and Is Ostracized, Demeaned and Threatened
By
dreamdancer, in Speakers Corner
Butters 0
rushmc 23
QuoteBlah, blah, blah ... what good Christians you are.
Hmm
So you do think that if someone has been exposed to the information and they chose to become followers they have been failed in teaching process and therfore have been indoctrinated?
I am seriously asking
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
david3 0
QuoteI did not get that from him either
I simple replied to the last post in the thread at the time.
But to follow up, what part of the my post do you consider inacurate?
This part.
"if regected, it is teaching. If followed or acepted, it it indoctrination"
rehmwa 2
QuoteThere is a difference between teaching and indoctrinating ...
indoctrination isn't a bad word, but people take it that way, and some 'indoctrination' is pretty loathsome, but not in terms of raising kids to the parent's values...
it's called doing what parents feel is best based on their own personal experiences - the trouble is when there is unsolicited outside influence that the parent isn't allowed to regulate - jayb got to choose his kid's environment so no issue. public schools thumb their noses at the parent's beliefs and indoctrinate according to the great commandments of socialization and NEA funding priorities.
I have no issue with a very religious family trying to pass those values onto their children. Ditto for atheists trying to do the same from their faith and indoctrinate their kids.
As an agnostic, I try to expose my child to all beliefs so she can decide on her own (of course, colored by my personal level of skeptism) hoping she'll choose to follow suit - isn't that also indoctrinating her to my agnostic values?
and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that
edit: see you Friday
...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants
rushmc 23
QuoteQuoteI did not get that from him either
I simple replied to the last post in the thread at the time.
But to follow up, what part of the my post do you consider inacurate?
This part.
"if regected, it is teaching. If followed or acepted, it it indoctrination"
So, if someone chose to follow, they could be, in your estimation, taught or indoctrinated?
How would some one determine which is which?
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
rehmwa 2
QuoteSo, if someone chose to follow, they could be, in your estimation, taught or indoctrinated?
How would some one determine which is which?
if we want to choose to use the word "indoctrination" in it's most negative sense then:
"indoctrination" is the teaching to children beliefs that are counter to the wishes of their parents (who are responsible for that alone)
how's that?
any other definition is just - indoctrination is teach people something I don't believe in
which sucks as a definition
...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants
Butters 0
QuoteQuoteBlah, blah, blah ... what good Christians you are.
Hmm
So you do think that if someone has been exposed to the information and they chose to become followers they have been failed in teaching process and therfore have been indoctrinated?
Am seriously asking
Revised my previous post to reflect my thoughts. I think you've failed in the teaching process when you pose one theory as right and the competing theories as wrong instead of teaching the theories as theories and allowing the individual to make their own decision.
PS: At what age would you allow your child to deny your religion and refrain from participating in it?
rushmc 23
QuoteQuoteSo, if someone chose to follow, they could be, in your estimation, taught or indoctrinated?
How would some one determine which is which?
if we want to choose to use the word "indoctrination" in it's most negative sense then:
"indoctrination" is the teaching to children beliefs that are counter to the wishes of their parents (who are responsible for that alone)
how's that?
any other definition is just - indoctrination is teach people something I don't believe in
which sucks as a definition
I could go with this
But I was not the one who used the word here
I find it curious how some anti religion relious nuts are just as passonate in their beliefs but po po the beliefs of others. And then tell them if their children turn out to be followers then they were failed some how
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
david3 0
QuoteQuoteQuoteI did not get that from him either
I simple replied to the last post in the thread at the time.
But to follow up, what part of the my post do you consider inacurate?
This part.
"if regected, it is teaching. If followed or acepted, it it indoctrination"
So, if someone chose to follow, they could be, in your estimation, taught or indoctrinated?
How would some one determine which is which?
I’m not trying to be flip but there are many sites online that will give you definitions for the terms teaching and indoctrination. I don’t believe any of them offer anything like "if regected, it is teaching. If followed or acepted, it it indoctrination".
You asked “if I am following this correctly”. I didn’t think you were.
I simple replied to the last post in the thread at the time.
But to follow up, what part of the my post do you consider inacurate?
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites