0
dreamdancer

High School Student Stands Up Against Prayer at Public School and Is Ostracized, Demeaned and Threatened

Recommended Posts

Given your posting history it's unlikely that you would (or could) understand the difference. I can't think of any reason to continue this discussion.



Oh I do understand

And your post is a perfect example of why I asked the questions and why I asked them the way I did.

Now you show your arrogant indignation when you imply that I do not understand

Let me ask you this

You feel that when others beliefs regarding religion affect your life. This is why you are all pissy at the moment

Now do you honestly feel your beliefs do NOT affect others ?

Cause if you do you are delusional at best

So it is easy to see why you would like to exit the conversation
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

So by allowing my children to have an open conversation with them and allowing them to have their own belief system, I am indoctrinating them?



which definition are we using now?


Anyway - I have a positive version - You are guiding them to your position on the matter. Isn't that indoctrination? Isn't that also good parenting?

If you go with the negative version - nope, it's your kids. But if you force another person to explore all options (example - they only want their kids to be rabid atheists or rabid christians) - then you are espousing indoctrination


Indoctrination is about 'who' is doing the teaching (an outsider). Not 'what' is being taught. you're mixing up the two.

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh mighty....possibly conscious or unconscious being of energy, or possibly corporeal, or spirit (if you are so inclined to accept that term). However, if you don't exist, please ignore this message but consider it just a speech of general goodwill....

Please bless/lookupon/ignore/empower this Bachelor Party and or event which you may or may not approve of, if you exist in some form or not.

In your name - or my name - or in the name of the pretty girl about to dance on Butter's lap. Either way.

Just in case, or not.

the end

((I'm good with this:P:D:D))


...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Oh I do understand

And your post is a perfect example of why I asked the questions and why I asked them the way I did.



This shows your arrogance.

Quote

Now you show your arrogant indignation when you imply that I do not understand



Learn English ... implying you don't understand may show arrogance but it doesn't show indignation.

Quote

Now do you honestly feel your beliefs do NOT affect others ?



No. I honestly believe that your beliefs currently affect me more than my beliefs affect you and believe this should be changed.

Quote

Cause if you do you are delusional at best



Believing the fantasies in the Bible were a reality is delusional at best.
"That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Oh mighty....possibly conscious or unconscious being of energy, or possibly corporeal, or spirit (if you are so inclined to accept that term). However, if you don't exist, please ignore this message but consider it just a speech of general goodwill....

Please bless/lookupon/ignore/empower this Bachelor Party and or event which you may or may not approve of, if you exist in some form or not.

In your name - or my name - or in the name of the pretty girl about to dance on Butter's lap. Either way.

Just in case, or not.

the end

((I'm good with this:P:D:D))



Bill, I doubt any girl will be dancing on my lap ... no strippers and you've witnessed my game (or lack thereof).
"That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Blah, blah, blah ... what good Christians you are. :D



Hmm

So you do think that if someone has been exposed to the information and they chose to become followers they have been failed in teaching process and therfore have been indoctrinated?

Am seriously asking


Revised my previous post to reflect my thoughts. I think you've failed in the teaching process when you pose one theory as right and the competing theories as wrong instead of teaching the theories as theories and allowing the individual to make their own decision.Ok, I can go with this too. But answer me this, if they make a decsion that they want to follow, were they taught or indocrinated?

PS: At what age would you allow your child to deny your religion and refrain from participating in it?
When they move out

It is my house


All children are born Atheist, no one is born believing in the supernatural. A child must be indoctrinated to be a believer. You would never ask a 3 year old what political party he belongs to and then take his answer seriously.

I never once told my daughter there was no God or that I was an Atheist. I just raised her to be a skeptic, and to question things that don't pass the smell test. The last thing I wanted to do was indoctrinate her with my lack of belief in the supernatural and then have her turn into a believer and blame me for trying to keep her from God.

I think it's fine to try and pass on your morales and ethics to your children, but the belief in the
supernatural should be a choice left to be made as an adult. To try and say the bible teaches morales and ethics is just being dishonest with yourself and your children.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Believing the fantasies in the Bible were a reality is delusional at best.



Not necessarily. There are those of us that actually are able to believe and understand the scientific community's discoverings and still have what could be defined as a "literal" interpretation of the bible.

Sounds strange, but I do believe the God of the bible is the same as the God of science, and although many Christians would call me a heretic, I don't feel that scientific findings have to conflict with Genesis when given the context of who, how, and why the book was written.

So as impossible as it may sound, I believe in a "literal" interpretation of Genesis, but I also believe in the evolution of species and that the earth is billions of years old. There's no way to explain all my reasoning in one post, but here's a link that best sums up what myself and many of us have come to believe, and why.

Keep in mind the discussion in this link was meant to address Christians that want to deny scientific findings, not try to convince scientists that Christianity can fit into their view. I'm only referencing the article to show that some of us aren't as illogical as you may think, unless you believe it is impossible to believe in both a creator and science.

http://www.bcbsr.com/survey/genint.html

Anyway this is getting off track a bit and probably deserves a thread of its own.



Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

You are guiding them to your position on the matter.



No, I am guiding them to their position on the matter.



as do jaybird, rush, jakee and all the others of all these differing beliefs

their position as guided by the parent, the child can decide when they are an adult - in the meantime, we choose what they get exposed to as parents. You have more of a smorgasbord, as do I, and those guys do their thing - as is their right

that's a form of indoctrination - it's not a bad thing, it just is

do you want to force them to take up your style with their kids? if so, then that's a bad advocacy of a different kind of indoctrination

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I think it's fine to try and pass on your morales and ethics to your children,



I think this is the whole point. Some people don't think "it's fine" unless those ethics and morals and Rita Morales align with their vision.

not a lot of "let the parents be parents" attitudes here at all it seems

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

my kid's private Christian school. Within their classical model of instruction, they're taught logic and critical thinking skills.



Figures. Teach them to recognise the enemy and they'll know how to avoid them.:S


Would you not be open for Ken Ham or even Ben Stein to lecture at your kid's school (if you have kids)? Or do you "teach them to recognize the enemy?" Wouldn't it be good for them to really know both sides of the issues and have the critical thinking skills to decide for themselves which is correct?


I didn't mean Richard Dawkins was the enemy, I meant logic and critical thinking are their enemy. Assuming they're also going to grow up thinking the world is 6000 years old, Noah actually had an ark and the banana is god's greatest gift to his creation.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

i think it is pretty obvious that the world isn't 6000 years old and noah didn't have ark...



Depends on your presuppositions.



no, just a simple test of logic and critical thinking. i would be extremely suspicious of anyone who hasn't worked out that father xmas doesn't actually exist for instance...
stay away from moving propellers - they bite
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

no, just a simple test of logic and critical thinking. i would be extremely suspicious of anyone who hasn't worked out that father xmas doesn't actually exist for instance...



I would be very suspicious of that person also.



and just as suspicious of someone who hasn't worked out that the world isn't 6000 years old and there was no ark...
stay away from moving propellers - they bite
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

So it's only critical thinking if the results they come up with match up with yours. Got it.



Don't be daft. I think we can all agree that the brand of unbridled bullshit you subscribe to requires you reason switch to be over-ridden by your faith switch.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

no, just a simple test of logic and critical thinking. i would be extremely suspicious of anyone who hasn't worked out that father xmas doesn't actually exist for instance...



I would be very suspicious of that person also.



and just as suspicious of someone who hasn't worked out that the world isn't 6000 years old and there was no ark...



Again...depends on your presuppositions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

i think it is pretty obvious that the world isn't 6000 years old and noah didn't have ark...



Depends on your presuppositions.



Yes. On the one hand we have the presupposition that evidence is useful, on the other hand we have the presupposition that everything we think we know about the universe is flat wrong, except the stuff written by a bunch quasi nomadic tribesmen who'd only just figured out that a golden statue of a cow didn't really have magical powers.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Don't be daft. I think we can all agree that the brand of unbridled bullshit you subscribe to requires you reason switch to be over-ridden by your faith switch.



You can't "shut down" opposing views no matter how insulting you come across.



And you can't pretend that ludicrous beliefs have anything to do with anything that could be considered actual thought.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0