Dems Furious After Vote Change Gives Lead to Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice
By
rushmc, in Speakers Corner
Recommended Posts
Amazon 7
Quote[Reply]It sure seemed to work well for George Bush
Or, it can also be viewed that by a 7-2 Supreme Court decision, it didn't work for Al Gore.
On a court stacked by conservative republicans with conservative Republican jurors there could not have been a different outcome than we saw. Our standing in the world and our economy.... are also a historical fact where you and yours who voted for that travesty took us.
airdvr 210
QuoteQuote[Reply]It sure seemed to work well for George Bush
Or, it can also be viewed that by a 7-2 Supreme Court decision, it didn't work for Al Gore.
On a court stacked by conservative republicans with conservative Republican jurors there could not have been a different outcome than we saw. Our standing in the world and our economy.... are also a historical fact where you and yours who voted for that travesty took us.
Wow...you still think W stole the election...




Please don't dent the planet.
Destinations by Roxanne
Destinations by Roxanne
Amazon 7
QuoteQuoteQuote[Reply]It sure seemed to work well for George Bush
Or, it can also be viewed that by a 7-2 Supreme Court decision, it didn't work for Al Gore.
On a court stacked by conservative republicans with conservative Republican jurors there could not have been a different outcome than we saw. Our standing in the world and our economy.... are also a historical fact where you and yours who voted for that travesty took us.
Wow...you still think W stole the election...




The fact that you and your felloww travellers support the suppression of EVEN ONE vote goes to show just how morally depraved ande racist your party had become. Facts is facts.. but I guess in your mind any way you can lie steal or stack ballot boxes to get a WIN.... is all good.
The fact was the Bush camp tried to suppress all votes that were not in by the time required by the law. The Gore camp tried to suppress only those votes that he figured would be against him and give him additional time to find those votes
that would be in his favor.
I suspect that yoy have zero problem with it. Your side does it = admirable. The other side does it = repugnant. The other side says, "None of them are valid - even those that could be in my favir" = bad. Your side says, "Mine should have been valid but not his" = good.
It seems to be what you are saying.
My wife is hotter than your wife.
that would be in his favor.
I suspect that yoy have zero problem with it. Your side does it = admirable. The other side does it = repugnant. The other side says, "None of them are valid - even those that could be in my favir" = bad. Your side says, "Mine should have been valid but not his" = good.
It seems to be what you are saying.
My wife is hotter than your wife.
My wife is hotter than your wife.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites