0
jclalor

Fox and Beck to go seperate ways....

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Uh how many non rePUBIClowns do you think watch FAUX NEWS???



How many Dems voted for Obama because he was black?



How many of your ilk would never vote for someone like him because he is black, that is the far more sailient question.



I didnt vote for Obama because I thought he was an unqualified dumb ass

Which he has now proven me right


And now we know he pulled Biden along to help him look smarter

at least that worked




Priceless all things... and I do mean ALL things.... considered


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

How many Dems voted for Obama because he was black?



How many... would never vote for someone like him because he is black, that is the far more sailient question.



I'd say both positions are clearly racist and equally salient - I can't really tell the difference - racism = racism from both directions.

we can only hope those voters cancel each other out and the rest of us can recognize them for who they are



So you are saying that for you to vote for a white man is racist because you have always voted for a white man???



That's an odd take on the comment. Where are trying to twist this?

No, if someone votes for a person SOLELY due to race or gender (or eye color or anything cosmetic) is dispicable and ridiculously lazy.

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

he pulled Biden along to help him look smarter



OK - you owe me a new keyboard dammit

He has Biden to eliminate any desire for presidential assassination because the alternate is even more frightening

Much like GHWB has Quayle (or Quaiyle)

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

he pulled Biden along to help him look smarter



OK - you owe me a new keyboard dammit

He has Biden to eliminate any desire for presidential assassination because the alternate is even more frightening

Much like GHWB has Quayle (or Quaiyle)


The best Leno line I heard in a long time is related to this

Leno said there were rumors that impeachment procedings against Obama were starting on Capitial Hill

He had two words to argue against that

Joe Biden

:D
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

he pulled Biden along to help him look smarter



OK - you owe me a new keyboard dammit

He has Biden to eliminate any desire for presidential assassination because the alternate is even more frightening

Much like GHWB has Quayle (or Quaiyle)



That was f*cking awesome. Just give me the new keyboard once rush gives it to you.

I miss Lee.
And JP.
And Chris. And...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

How many Dems voted for Obama because he was black?



How many... would never vote for someone like him because he is black, that is the far more sailient question.



I'd say both positions are clearly racist and equally salient - I can't really tell the difference - racism = racism from both directions.

we can only hope those voters cancel each other out and the rest of us can recognize them for who they are



So you are saying that for you to vote for a white man is racist because you have always voted for a white man???



That's an odd take on the comment. Where are trying to twist this?

No, if someone votes for a person SOLELY due to race or gender (or eye color or anything cosmetic) is dispicable and ridiculously lazy.



Oh I don't know.... it seems a WHOLE lot of people have been voting for people who look just like them for a hell of a long time.... who was it who started this whole Voting thing again????

Based on what you said... if a black man votes for Obama because he looks just like him.. that is racist, but if ole Billy Bob votes for Haley Barbour because well he looks just like him that is not.

Cain't have that now cain we... you iz wantin your hog, taters and cornbread and have it nice and soft so you can eats it too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

How many Dems voted for Obama because he was black?



How many... would never vote for someone like him because he is black, that is the far more sailient question.



I'd say both positions are clearly racist and equally salient - I can't really tell the difference - racism = racism from both directions.

we can only hope those voters cancel each other out and the rest of us can recognize them for who they are



So you are saying that for you to vote for a white man is racist because you have always voted for a white man???



That's an odd take on the comment. Where are trying to twist this?

No, if someone votes for a person SOLELY due to race or gender (or eye color or anything cosmetic) is dispicable and ridiculously lazy.



Oh I don't know.... it seems a WHOLE lot of people have been voting for people who look just like them for a hell of a long time.... who was it who started this whole Voting thing again????

Based on what you said... if a black man votes for Obama because he looks just like him.. that is racist, but if ole Billy Bob votes for Haley Barbour because well he looks just like him that is not.

Cain't have that now cain we... you iz wantin your hog, taters and cornbread and have it nice and soft so you can eats it too.



You must be smoking a Jeffrey. OK, here's what you do... first, stroke a fury wall. Then, re-read what the good man said which was nothing like the shit-stirring nonsense you tried to throw out...

Quote

No, if someone votes for a person SOLELY due to race or gender (or eye color or anything cosmetic) is dispicable and ridiculously lazy.



I miss Lee.
And JP.
And Chris. And...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

How many Dems voted for Obama because he was black?



How many... would never vote for someone like him because he is black, that is the far more sailient question.



I'd say both positions are clearly racist and equally salient - I can't really tell the difference - racism = racism from both directions.

we can only hope those voters cancel each other out and the rest of us can recognize them for who they are



So you are saying that for you to vote for a white man is racist because you have always voted for a white man???



That's an odd take on the comment. Where are trying to twist this?

No, if someone votes for a person SOLELY due to race or gender (or eye color or anything cosmetic) is dispicable and ridiculously lazy.



Oh I don't know.... it seems a WHOLE lot of people have been voting for people who look just like them for a hell of a long time.... who was it who started this whole Voting thing again????

Based on what you said... if a black man votes for Obama because he looks just like him.. that is racist, but if ole Billy Bob votes for Haley Barbour because well he looks just like him that is not.

Cain't have that now cain we... you iz wantin your hog, taters and cornbread and have it nice and soft so you can eats it too.



You must be smoking a Jeffrey. OK, here's what you do... first, stroke a fury wall. Then, re-read what the good man said which was nothing like the shit-stirring nonsense you tried to throw out...

Quote

No, if someone votes for a person SOLELY due to race or gender (or eye color or anything cosmetic) is dispicable and ridiculously lazy.





Then why oh why do you and yours continue to do it with such annoying frequency???

Oh and as far as the whole smokin a Jeffrey.... I am sure.. that those of you who DO... are as usual.... wrong in thast silly assumption that everyone else must be doing the same as they do. Not that there is anything wrong with that... in your mind..... butI guess you don't mind breaking the laws of our country for personal gratification.

Oh and on the strokin issue.... I will leave that to the family values right wing circle jerks.. who do it with such applomb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



You must be smoking a Jeffrey. OK, here's what you do... first, stroke a fury wall. Then, re-read what the good man said which was nothing like the shit-stirring nonsense you tried to throw out...

Quote

No, if someone votes for a person SOLELY due to race or gender (or eye color or anything cosmetic) is dispicable and ridiculously lazy.





Then why oh why do you and yours continue to do it with such annoying frequency???

Oh and as far as the whole smokin a Jeffrey.... I am sure.. that those of you who DO... are as usual.... wrong in thast silly assumption that everyone else must be doing the same as they do. Not that there is anything wrong with that... in your mind..... butI guess you don't mind breaking the laws of our country for personal gratification.

Oh and on the strokin issue.... I will leave that to the family values right wing circle jerks.. who do it with such applomb



Thank you for yet another barely intelligible, inane attempt at communicating (hence the Jeffrey smoking remark - please try to keep up, dear) which, again, did not even begin to address the central point of the issue, which was that you misunderstood the previous poster's point that outward appearances should not matter in the voting process. Instead, you went to your trademark go-to response of casting sexual deviant aspersions towards those you hate the most. I'm beginning to thing you're some sort of bot. The responses are just to rote.

I miss Lee.
And JP.
And Chris. And...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



You must be smoking a Jeffrey. OK, here's what you do... first, stroke a fury wall. Then, re-read what the good man said which was nothing like the shit-stirring nonsense you tried to throw out...

Quote

No, if someone votes for a person SOLELY due to race or gender (or eye color or anything cosmetic) is dispicable and ridiculously lazy.





Then why oh why do you and yours continue to do it with such annoying frequency???

Oh and as far as the whole smokin a Jeffrey.... I am sure.. that those of you who DO... are as usual.... wrong in thast silly assumption that everyone else must be doing the same as they do. Not that there is anything wrong with that... in your mind..... butI guess you don't mind breaking the laws of our country for personal gratification.

Oh and on the strokin issue.... I will leave that to the family values right wing circle jerks.. who do it with such applomb



Thank you for yet another barely intelligible, inane attempt at communicating (hence the Jeffrey smoking remark - please try to keep up, dear) which, again, did not even begin to address the central point of the issue, which was that you misunderstood the previous poster's point that outward appearances should not matter in the voting process. Instead, you went to your trademark go-to response of casting sexual deviant aspersions towards those you hate the most. I'm beginning to thing you're some sort of bot. The responses are just to rote.



Nah... just utilizing the language this less than august audience can comprehend. I try so hard not to use concepts you do not understand... just to insure my point is clear to those here with such limited capacity for understanding, and used to FAUX NEWS ... with their patented "fair and balanced" never is heard any discouraging words.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Nah... just utilizing the language this less than august audience can comprehend. I try so hard not to use concepts you do not understand... just to insure my point is clear to those here with such limited capacity for understanding, and used to FAUX NEWS ... with their patented "fair and balanced" never is heard any discouraging words.



Pandering looks so GOOD on you, Jeanne! And bonus points for the use of the term "august!" *golfclap*

I miss Lee.
And JP.
And Chris. And...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

How many Dems voted for Obama because he was black?



How many... would never vote for someone like him because he is black, that is the far more sailient question.


I'd say both positions are clearly racist and equally salient - I can't really tell the difference - racism = racism from both directions.

we can only hope those voters cancel each other out and the rest of us can recognize them for who they are


They will. I voted for Obama because he's white:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

How many of your ilk would never vote for someone like him because he is black, that is the far more sailient question



Well, he won 53% of the total vote... And 43% of the white vote.

I do love how you try to make everything about the person.... Sad really.

You have no proof, but you do love calling anyone that does not buy into your line of BS as racist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

How many of your ilk would never vote for someone like him because he is black, that is the far more sailient question



Well, he won 53% of the total vote... And 43% of the white vote.

I do love how you try to make everything about the person.... Sad really.

You have no proof, but you do love calling anyone that does not buy into your line of BS as racist.



Statistics do have a way of pointing out the obvious...

I think we can count on you being one of the 57% of white voters who did not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Statistics do have a way of pointing out the obvious...



The white vote went 44% for Obama vs. 41% for Kerry.

Must suck when those statistics you tout prove your posts to be a lie.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Statistics do have a way of pointing out the obvious...



The white vote went 44% for Obama vs. 41% for Kerry.

Must suck when those statistics you tout prove your posts to be a lie.


There you go again... Poor Mikeee,,, just cain't hep hissef


:ph34r::ph34r:

So how many Whites did NOT vote for him??? HMMMMMMM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

So how many Whites did NOT vote for him??? HMMMMMMM



3% less than did NOT vote for Kerry. I would ask when you were going to come to some sort of point, but it's obvious you don't have one.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

That's an odd take on the comment. Where are trying to twist this?



It is what she does... she took my comment about how some hawks to serve in the military, but in an MOS that would never see combat as a slam on women... She then started PM'ing me like crazy.

Quote

No, if someone votes for a person SOLELY due to race or gender (or eye color or anything cosmetic) is dispicable and ridiculously lazy.



I agree FOR or AGAINST is the same level of racism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

That's an odd take on the comment. Where are trying to twist this?



It is what she does... she took my comment about how some hawks to serve in the military, but in an MOS that would never see combat as a slam on women... She then started PM'ing me like crazy.

Quote

No, if someone votes for a person SOLELY due to race or gender (or eye color or anything cosmetic) is dispicable and ridiculously lazy.



I agree FOR or AGAINST is the same level of racism.


DUUUUUUDE you have us rolling with laughter here....:ph34r::ph34r::ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Statistics do have a way of pointing out the obvious...



Only if you know how to read them.... AND you do not use preconceived notions to try and skew the results.

Quote

I think we can count on you being one of the 57% of white voters who did not.



Maybe, but then that would discount the Congressman that was black that I donated time and money to work for.

I know it is a complex issue and therefore difficult for some to grasp... It is not always about race even if it is all you can think about.

The majority of blacks that voted for Obama probably had more to do with how blacks normally vote Dem than him being black. Him being black may have been a motivator TO vote, but not the reason they voted for him.

But to play in your world:

So... If the majority of blacks voted for Obama 96% while 54% of white voters voted for Obama.... Who would be the racist again?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15297.html

Face it.. Once again you are proven to have no facts or data... Only loud opinions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Statistics do have a way of pointing out the obvious...



Only if you know how to read them.... AND you do not use preconceived notions to try and skew the results.

Quote

I think we can count on you being one of the 57% of white voters who did not.



Maybe, but then that would discount the Congressman that was black that I donated time and money to work for.

I know it is a complex issue and therefore difficult for some to grasp... It is not always about race even if it is all you can think about.

The majority of blacks that voted for Obama probably had more to do with how blacks normally vote Dem than him being black. Him being black may have been a motivator TO vote, but not the reason they voted for him.

But to play in your world:

So... If the majority of blacks voted for Obama 96% while 54% of white voters voted for Obama.... Who would be the racist again?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15297.html

Face it.. Once again you are proven to have no facts or data... Only loud opinions.


Tsk tsk tsk.... ya just cain't hep yousef cain ya there fella.:ph34r::ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



The topper is how he plays on the God and Jesus thing. the only difference between him an a Muslim is the skin color. He's a Mormon, you won't hear him say it, but he is not a Christian, A JW fits the Christian definition more than a he does.

A short clip (By the LDS) explaining the Mormon religion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0a3eJC3qAFU



Just for clarity, Mormons are very much Christians. I don't know why you'd imply (or outright say) differently. Second, the clip you linked here is NOT from the LDS church as you state. Terrible misinformation here. If you want to see what the LDS (Mormon) church is about, visit mormon.org or lds.org, not some Youtube video that has an ulterior motive and clearly is not from the LDS church.
Blues,
Nathan

If you wait 'til the last minute, it'll only take a minute.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0