airdvr 210 #1 March 25, 2011 Amazing how many of the libs were shitting bricks when W was considering Iraq without congressional approval.Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #2 March 25, 2011 QuoteAmazing how many of the libs were shitting bricks when W was considering Iraq without congressional approval. but they're amazingly quiet now, aren't they. I saw some squawking on the news yesterday by some reported Obama supporters. But for the most part, nothing.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #3 March 25, 2011 QuoteAmazing how many of the libs were shitting bricks when W was considering Iraq without congressional approval. Gee you mean like how Newt" TheSerialAdulterer" Gingrich was FOR the No Fly Zone, before he was agin it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,107 #4 March 25, 2011 And how many conservatives called anyone who was against the war a coward and a traitor. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdvr 210 #5 March 25, 2011 QuoteQuoteAmazing how many of the libs were shitting bricks when W was considering Iraq without congressional approval. Gee you mean like how Newt" TheSerialAdulterer" Gingrich was FOR the No Fly Zone, before he was agin it. Actually I was hoping you'd chime in. Your CHICKENHAWK president has put US soldiers in harms way. You OK with that?Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #6 March 25, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteAmazing how many of the libs were shitting bricks when W was considering Iraq without congressional approval. Gee you mean like how Newt" TheSerialAdulterer" Gingrich was FOR the No Fly Zone, before he was agin it. Actually I was hoping you'd chime in. Your CHICKENHAWK president has put US soldiers in harms way. You OK with that? CLUELESS as usual... I have never heard Obama continually beating the Drums of War as have the Legions of Conservatards in this country with butt boils to use as an excuse. He has been reluctant at best going into this.. and has only kept your Glorius Leaders Wars going to prevent far worse consequences, like what happened to Afghanistan after Ronald the Great "won" there and lost the end game. Personally I would bring all of our people home and let the fuckers get it on with slaughtering each other.. all over the world. Let the other countries of the world lose their children being the "sheriff" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #7 March 25, 2011 QuoteQuoteAmazing how many of the libs were shitting bricks when W was considering Iraq without congressional approval. but they're amazingly quiet now, aren't they. I saw some squawking on the news yesterday by some reported Obama supporters. But for the most part, nothing. Nice phrasing on your part - cover both sides so that no matter what, you can claim, "Well, this is what I mean." How very Gingrich-esque of you. Anyhow, your disregard for the facts can be demonstrated by - for example - this: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51595.html QuoteLiberal Democrats in uproar over Libya action A hard-core group of liberal House Democrats is questioning the constitutionality of U.S. missile strikes against Libya, with one lawmaker raising the prospect of impeachment during a Democratic Caucus conference call on Saturday. Reps. Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.), Donna Edwards (Md.), Mike Capuano (Mass.), Dennis Kucinich (Ohio), Maxine Waters (Calif.), Rob Andrews (N.J.), Sheila Jackson Lee (Texas), Barbara Lee (Calif.) and Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D.C.) “all strongly raised objections to the constitutionality of the president’s actions” during that call, said two Democratic lawmakers who took part. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdvr 210 #8 March 25, 2011 QuoteHe has been reluctant at best going into this.. Lol...so true. That's what I'm looking for in a leader...reluctancy. QuotePersonally I would bring all of our people home and let the fuckers get it on with slaughtering each other So you're on record as being against this move in Libya...good.Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #9 March 25, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteAmazing how many of the libs were shitting bricks when W was considering Iraq without congressional approval. but they're amazingly quiet now, aren't they. I saw some squawking on the news yesterday by some reported Obama supporters. But for the most part, nothing. Nice phrasing on your part - cover both sides so that no matter what, you can claim, "Well, this is what I mean." How very Gingrich-esque of you. Anyhow, your disregard for the facts can be demonstrated by - for example - this: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51595.html QuoteLiberal Democrats in uproar over Libya action A hard-core group of liberal House Democrats is questioning the constitutionality of U.S. missile strikes against Libya, with one lawmaker raising the prospect of impeachment during a Democratic Caucus conference call on Saturday. Reps. Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.), Donna Edwards (Md.), Mike Capuano (Mass.), Dennis Kucinich (Ohio), Maxine Waters (Calif.), Rob Andrews (N.J.), Sheila Jackson Lee (Texas), Barbara Lee (Calif.) and Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D.C.) “all strongly raised objections to the constitutionality of the president’s actions” during that call, said two Democratic lawmakers who took part. aside from your backhanded compliment, my phrasing was apparently not clear. the "they" I referred to in my first line was meant towards the "they" on this forum. My second line was referring to what you pasted. take your sideways PA and shove it.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #10 March 25, 2011 Quote Quote He has been reluctant at best going into this.. Lol...so true. That's what I'm looking for in a leader...reluctancy. Quote Personally I would bring all of our people home and let the fuckers get it on with slaughtering each other So you're on record as being against this move in Libya...good. If you had actually been reading and actually comprehending my posts.. you would have seen that weeks ago. Your lot reattly do not do well with your RAH RAH RAH WAR WAR WAR and the rather unintended circumstances that arise when force is "projected" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #11 March 25, 2011 QuoteMy second line was referring to what you pasted. Of course; thus, the "nice phrasing" on your part - you got both sides of your butt covered, don't you? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #12 March 25, 2011 QuoteQuoteMy second line was referring to what you pasted. Of course; thus, the "nice phrasing" on your part - you got both sides of your butt covered, don't you? nice.... ignore my first line, and chide me for referring to what you pasted. dick.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #13 March 25, 2011 How many different threads do "they" have to register their disapproval of the Libya mission? I've already done it once. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #14 March 25, 2011 sorry.... I don't read every single post. I missed one. Sue me.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #15 March 25, 2011 My lawyer will be in touch. My point is that this thread is essentially a carbon copy of another one about how "they" are hypocritical about Libya. "They" get annoyed by reposts. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #17 March 25, 2011 Quote Quote Sue me. -- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #18 March 28, 2011 Quote Anyhow, your disregard for the facts can be demonstrated by - for example - this: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51595.html QuoteLiberal Democrats in uproar over Libya action A hard-core group of liberal House Democrats is questioning the constitutionality of U.S. missile strikes against Libya, with one lawmaker raising the prospect of impeachment during a Democratic Caucus conference call on Saturday. Reps. Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.), Donna Edwards (Md.), Mike Capuano (Mass.), Dennis Kucinich (Ohio), Maxine Waters (Calif.), Rob Andrews (N.J.), Sheila Jackson Lee (Texas), Barbara Lee (Calif.) and Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D.C.) “all strongly raised objections to the constitutionality of the president’s actions” during that call, said two Democratic lawmakers who took part. I saw an interview of Kucinich on Al Jazzeer at an airport in Africa a week back. I was hoping he was going to force a test of the War Power Acts and let the courts settle this misappropriation of Constitutional power (dating back to Teddy R) once and for all. But I suppose we still have to wait several more weeks before that can be done. Unfortunately, when you look over that list of names, most of them are jokes. Yes, Barbara Lee voted against the last war too, but her influence in DC is nil, And Maxine Waters...WTF? I'll give her as much attention as Marrion Barry. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #19 March 29, 2011 Does anyone know what our exit strategy is for Libya? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #20 March 29, 2011 QuoteDoes anyone know what our exit strategy is for Libya? Turn on the afterburners.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kennedy 0 #21 March 29, 2011 QuoteQuoteDoes anyone know what our exit strategy is for Libya? Turn on the afterburners. Rephrase: does anyone know what president Obama's exit strategy and time table are for Libya? Ps - come on professor, you know the difference between tactics and strategy.witty subliminal message Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards. 1* Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #22 March 29, 2011 QuoteRephrase: does anyone know what president Obama's exit strategy and time table are for Libya? I heard an former military officer (Col, but I don't remember his name) on the radio the other day who stated that having a timetable and exit strategy for Iraq didn't imply that the war was any better planned than what's going on in Libya. He pointed out that the exit strategy and timetable for Iraq were pure fiction. Having a timetable and exit strategy for Libya, while it may be comforting, probably won't have anything to do with what actually happens. I wish we had stayed out of the conflict in Libya, and I sincerely hope we can extricate ourselves quickly, but not having a timetable of exit strategy doesn't mean much to me. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #23 March 29, 2011 Quote I wish we had stayed out of the conflict in Libya, and I sincerely hope we can extricate ourselves quickly, but not having a timetable of exit strategy doesn't mean much to me. A failure to plan is a plan to fail. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #24 March 29, 2011 Pithy. However, having a "plan" that is unreasonable and that you know you can't and won't follow is not planning. I would even go so far as to say it is, "planning to fail." - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #25 March 29, 2011 QuotePithy. However, having a "plan" that is unreasonable and that you know you can't and won't follow is not planning. I would even go so far as to say it is, "planning to fail." Hey it sure helped the last guy and all his PNAC buddies who got rich to sell the country a large plate of BULLSHIT Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
