Amazon 7 #101 March 25, 2011 QuoteQuote>Could someone tell me how it makes good environmental sense to >subsidize the mandate of low flow toilets (to the tune of several million >tax payer dollars) which resulted in the clogging of the sewer system, only >to be remedied by poring toxic chemicals ($$$) into the sewers? It doesn't. It makes more sense to just fix the sewer system to deal with modern plumbing. Of course that would solve the problem and rob you of an opportunity to be smug, arrogant and condescending - so I guess that's out. There wasn't anything smug, arrogant or condescending in his post - maybe you're thinking of your usual style of answer to questions involving the environment? Hey you would be incapable of seeing anything that those blinders you wear filter out so well Mike. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #102 March 25, 2011 Quote "unintended consequences... hey it happens" Now I understand, thank you for explaining it to me. We should ask the teachers, cops and firefighters how they think about being laid off du to "unintended consequences" we can just tell them "hey it happens" Lead poising from "green" grocery bags? "Hey it happens" People starving around the planet because we put food into gas tanks instead of on the table? "hey it happens" I thought you libs were supposed to be the compassionate ones???? How about thier pushing low flow toilets as a needed change to the OLD days when there was abundant water for the few people who were there when the sewers wer builtIf you look at the DATA.. ( I know that will be hard for you) but the population of the Bay Area is many millions and the number of droughts over the last 10 years has caused WATER SHORTAGES. People do not do so well with no water to drink let alone flush all that shit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #103 March 25, 2011 No droght this year! http://www.kvsun.com/articles/2011/03/08/news/doc4d769ce9ad472233718953.txt Global warming has resulted in a snow pack of >120% - 124% of normal. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,589 #104 March 25, 2011 That's kind of like spending your whole bonus, instead of using it to pay down some of the credit card debt you ran up when things were tough. Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #105 March 25, 2011 Quote No droght this year! http://www.kvsun.com/articles/2011/03/08/news/doc4d769ce9ad472233718953.txt Global warming has resulted in a snow pack of >120% - 124% of normal. Wiggle wiggle wiggle..... obfuscate obfuscate obfuscate. I realize its difficult for you rape and pillage the planet for fun and personal profit crowd to understand but the trend over the years is CERTAINLY has been and will continue to be drought conditions.... with more people= water shortages. If you look at the resevoirs that the people of the Bay Area reley on its a LONG LONG way from the high water marks in them down to the water level. But go ahead and believe as you will.. I am kind of looking forward to the consequences brought about by all your fellow travellers short-sightedness. I am prepared for a far different world should it come into being than the one that SO CALLED "conservatives" should have been fighting to actually CONSERVE Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #106 March 25, 2011 Yawn, I am growing tired of punching down, Peace out! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
