OK, if someone gets hurt or shot will the media blame the dems?

[rushmc 23]

Civility at its best?

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/145627-dem-lawmaker-on-labor-protests-get-a-little-bloody-when-necessary

Quote

Dem tells unions: 'Get a little bloody when necessary'
By Michael O'Brien - 02/23/11 07:57 AM ET


Sometimes it's necessary to get out on the streets and "get a little bloody," a Massachusetts Democrat said Tuesday in reference to labor battles in Wisconsin.

Or is this not as bad as cross hairs?

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[JohnRich 4]

Quote

Or is this not as bad as cross hairs?

Not as bad as that Thomas Jefferson quote about the "tree of liberty" either. At least as long as it's a dem saying it.

[DaVinci 0]

Well, it is not an issue since it was a (D) that said it.

[billvon 3,119]

Wow, you're still really sensitive about how your heroine got burned.

[futuredivot 0]

Wow, you're still really prone to attack the poster instead of the post.

You are only as strong as the prey you devour

[jgoose71 0]

It's only hypocrisy when it comes from the right.

"There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss."
Life, the Universe, and Everything

[rushmc 23]

Quote

It's only hypocrisy when it comes from the right.

Ya, and the burning bag of dog poop on the front step has already been stepped in

I just not figure billvon to be the stepper

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[DanG 1]

I would have thought you'd know to leave these circle jerk threads alone by now.

- Dan G

[rushmc 23]

Quote

I would have thought you'd know to leave these circle jerk threads alone by now.

I would think you and your foresight would too

Or is that your foreskin?

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[DanG 1]

You're right. I thought about that as I was posting. Frankly, the fact that I come to SC at all anymore I consider a personal flaw. There is no discussion or debate, just high fiving and insults.

- Dan G

[rushmc 23]

Quote

You're right. I thought about that as I was posting. Frankly, the fact that I come to SC at all anymore I consider a personal flaw. There is no discussion or debate, just high fiving and insults.

If they are not started by someone on their high horse there are some interesting exchanges

neither billvon or yours met that criteria huh


go figure

Go look at Wendy's thread

Was a good exchange until the teach got smart assed in it

But the left here feels the need to belittle those with whom they disagree with

Some of the rest of us just follow along when someone takes the lead

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[CanuckInUSA 0]

Quote

You're right. I thought about that as I was posting. Frankly, the fact that I come to SC at all anymore I consider a personal flaw. There is no discussion or debate, just high fiving and insults.

There are some good things on the internet. But there is also no shortage of cancerous elements. One of the cancerous elements of the internet is "Blogging" where anyone with a keyboard and access to the net proclaims to the world "usually using vitriol" how they are right and how anyone who disagrees with them is wrong. People from all political sides are guilty of this. You know the saying "Arguing on the internet is like competing in the Special Olympics. Even if you think you have won your argument, you are still retarded".

Now to show everyone I am not immune from this retardation ...

How come it is okay for Lefist politicians to insight violence. How come the mainstream media is NOT reporting what Democratic Michael Capuano has told his lemmings? Hypocrisy in action in the mainstream media.

Try not to worry about the things you have no control over

[DanG 1]

You think this thread qualified as an interesting exchange? You think your OP was not posted from up on a high horse?

Give me a break.

Wendy's thread is still intersting. kallend (who you seem to have a particular dislike for) didn't get any more smart assed than anyone else. You took his comments completely out of context. That's not surprising given the history you two have of sniping at each other, but if you really think he's the only one who contributes to the negative tone here, you need to take a step back.

For the record, what this guy said is stupid, and it is not unreasonable that some small portion of the blame for future violence be placed on his shoulders. Whether the media will do that or not is unclear. On the other hand, you have to admit there is a difference in circumstance between the crosshair situation (where a particular person targeted by a prominent political figure was shot in the head) and this one (where a much less recognizable figure made a vague reference to unspecific violent acts).

- Dan G

[rushmc 23]

Quote

You think this thread qualified as an interesting exchange? You think your OP was not posted from up on a high horse?

Give me a break.

Wendy's thread is still intersting. kallend (who you seem to have a particular dislike for) didn't get any more smart assed than anyone else. You took his comments completely out of context. That's not surprising given the history you two have of sniping at each other, but if you really think he's the only one who contributes to the negative tone here, you need to take a step back.

For the record, what this guy said is stupid, and it is not unreasonable that some small portion of the blame for future violence be placed on his shoulders. Whether the media will do that or not is unclear. On the other hand, you have to admit there is a difference in circumstance between the crosshair situation (where a particular person targeted by a prominent political figure was shot in the head) and this one (where a much less recognizable figure made a vague reference to unspecific violent acts).

For the record

Yes, what the guy said was stupid
But no, only those who use violence are responcible.

Blaming this guy or Palin is dumb as dirt

So you at least get why this was posted

Where is the outrage from the left regarding vitirolic hate speach????

Didnt see any from you

Just a drive by post insulting any and who would let you

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[DanG 1]

Quote

Where is the outrage from the left regarding vitirolic hate speach????

Didnt see any from you

Just a drive by post insulting any and who would let you

You didn't see any outrage from me about the previous incident.

Hint: "The Left" doesn't all think exactly alike.

Who, exactly, did I insult? Please be specific.

- Dan G

[rushmc 23]

Quote

Quote

Where is the outrage from the left regarding vitirolic hate speach????

Didnt see any from you

Just a drive by post insulting any and who would let you

You didn't see any outrage from me about the previous incident.

Hint: "The Left" doesn't all think exactly alike.

Who, exactly, did I insult? Please be specific.

Then I was not posting to you!

Why did you reply?

all who had posted in this thread except billvon

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rushmc 23]

Quote

You think this thread qualified as an interesting exchange? You think your OP was not posted from up on a high horse?

Give me a break.

Wendy's thread is still intersting. kallend (who you seem to have a particular dislike for) didn't get any more smart assed than anyone else. You took his comments completely out of context. That's not surprising given the history you two have of sniping at each other, but if you really think he's the only one who contributes to the negative tone here, you need to take a step back.

For the record, what this guy said is stupid, and it is not unreasonable that some small portion of the blame for future violence be placed on his shoulders. Whether the media will do that or not is unclear. On the other hand, you have to admit there is a difference in circumstance between the crosshair situation (where a particular person targeted by a prominent political figure was shot in the head) and this one (where a much less recognizable figure made a vague reference to unspecific violent acts).

It is also disingenuous of you to say the cross hairs were on the person
It was a district

The cross hairs have been used for years and a prominent Dem said HE started it

To say there is a difference shows nothing but dishonesty in the debate or flawed or brain dead thinking IMO

At least it is hypocritical. AT the Very least

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[DanG 1]

They were crosshairs. The disingenous part was to claim they were surveyor's marks. I'm not going to dig up my post about the Arizona incident to quote it, but I thought I was pretty clear at the time. People who commit violent acts are to blame for what they've done. On the other hand, if a person incites another to violence, they should share some of that blame. I personally don't think crosshairs over a district (happy?) or the comment to "get bloody" rises to the level of inciting violence.

- Dan G

[rushmc 23]

Quote

They were crosshairs. The disingenous part was to claim they were surveyor's marks. I'm not going to dig up my post about the Arizona incident to quote it, but I thought I was pretty clear at the time. People who commit violent acts are to blame for what they've done. On the other hand, if a person incites another to violence, they should share some of that blame. I personally don't think crosshairs over a district (happy?) or the comment to "get bloody" rises to the level of inciting violence.

Neither do I

But many who posted here and the talking heads must disagree with us both

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[KidWicked 0]

Quote

Go look at Wendy's thread

Was a good exchange until the teach got smart assed in it

But the left here feels the need to belittle those with whom they disagree with

"teach" "smart assed" "belittle"...

I think this is the root of your obsession with kallend. He's got all that "book learning" (that you don't have) and society recognizes him as being more qualified, more intelligent than you. And it just absolutely eats you alive.

Coreece: "You sound like some skinheads I know, but your prejudice is with Christians, not niggers..."

[rushmc 23]

Quote

Quote

Go look at Wendy's thread

Was a good exchange until the teach got smart assed in it

But the left here feels the need to belittle those with whom they disagree with

"teach" "smart assed" "belittle"...

I think this is the root of your obsession with kallend. He's got all that "book learning" (that you don't have) and society recognizes him as being more qualified, more intelligent than you. And it just absolutely eats you alive.

Cool
I will put you as in the same boat with him

Thanks

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[marks2065 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Go look at Wendy's thread

Was a good exchange until the teach got smart assed in it

But the left here feels the need to belittle those with whom they disagree with

"teach" "smart assed" "belittle"...

I think this is the root of your obsession with kallend. He's got all that "book learning" (that you don't have) and society recognizes him as being more qualified, more intelligent than you. And it just absolutely eats you alive.

Cool
I will put you as in the same boat with him

Thanks

you notice that no one on the left is on here blasting this comment nor the actions and banners in wisconsin? must be ok for the left but not the right.

[rushmc 23]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Go look at Wendy's thread

Was a good exchange until the teach got smart assed in it

But the left here feels the need to belittle those with whom they disagree with

"teach" "smart assed" "belittle"...

I think this is the root of your obsession with kallend. He's got all that "book learning" (that you don't have) and society recognizes him as being more qualified, more intelligent than you. And it just absolutely eats you alive.

Cool
I will put you as in the same boat with him

Thanks

you notice that no one on the left is on here blasting this comment nor the actions and banners in wisconsin? must be ok for the left but not the right.

I have noticed

Point of the thread

Selective indignation

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[DaVinci 0]

Quote

There is no discussion or debate, just high fiving and insults.

There is no debate because some can't defend their hypocrisy.

(R) Puts out a mailing with crosshairs: She is based ofr doing it.

(D) Puts out a mailing with crosshairs: Nothing.

There clearly is a double standard when one group ONLY bashes when ONE party does something and ignores it when their own party does the same thing.

There is no debate here since those that bashed Palin do not have the same outrage and see no problem when a candidate or party they support does it.

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Civility at its best?

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/145627-dem-lawmaker-on-labor-protests-get-a-little-bloody-when-necessary

Quote

Dem tells unions: 'Get a little bloody when necessary'
By Michael O'Brien - 02/23/11 07:57 AM ET


Sometimes it's necessary to get out on the streets and "get a little bloody," a Massachusetts Democrat said Tuesday in reference to labor battles in Wisconsin.

Or is this not as bad as cross hairs?

No it means what it means... The union people protest or strike.. and the RICH monied interests send in their goons to break the strike.. beating and clubbing the union members as has happened for the last 100 years.

I find it very instructive that YOUR hero in Wisconsin.. the Gov... stated openly( well he never meant for it to get out in his chat with the big money guy David Kock that he thought he was talking to since he had been lavishly trikled upon so had to listen to) that they had thought about putting right wing goons into the crowd.. to make trouble.