0
Guest

Egypt Military Appoints Islamofascist Wacko to Amend Constitution

Recommended Posts

Guest
This makes me laugh --

'"Tarek el Bishry is not an extremist, he's a moderate Islamist,' Mr Bastawisi said yesterday."

How can there even be such a thing as a moderate islamist? Oh, I know, he tells other people to blow themselves up instead of blowing himself up.

Link to Story in UAE English-Language News Online

mh
.
"The mouse does not know life until it is in the mouth of the cat."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

CAIRO // A respected former judge who has criticised secular government will lead the effort to amend Egypt's constitution and end military rule within six months, the heads of the armed forces announced yesterday.

The appointment of Tarek el Bishry, who has urged a greater role for Islam in Egyptian society, was criticised by some liberal secularists and Christian leaders. It highlights the tug of war taking place to shape the character of the new Egypt after the resignation of the former president, Hosni Mubarak.



Government respecting religions, that I'm good with. Making the government religious, not so much. Really, is it possible to have a government that subscribes to Islam exist as a democracy?

If the autocratic thug gave a shot about his country, he would have work to creat a democracy without all these factions going crazy. Instead, "Hey, no pressure, but you've got six months. Good luck."

So the first middle eastern country to recognize Israel is now going down the opposite road. Wonderful.
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No one is saying the new guy in charge has to be atheist, or even that he has to be reasonable in his religion. But there's a difference between a leader having religion and some guy being appointed to unilaterally amend or revise the constitution, don't you think?

I'm sure everyone running for US Pres in 2012 will claim to be some sort of Christian or another. I doubt there will be a big brouhaha about that. But if after demonstrations in the street by everyone from libertarians to greenpeacers to socialists to Christian Identity groups, Roberts or Scalia or Thomas were appointed to rework the constitution to out more Christianity into it, people would have the right to be a bit pissed off, don't you think?
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

CAIRO // A respected former judge who has criticised secular government....The appointment of Tarek el Bishry, who has urged a greater role for Islam in Egyptian society,



Hmmmmm....something smells here.
My reality and yours are quite different.
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Really, is it possible to have a government that subscribes to Islam exist as a democracy?


Who cares?

Quote

If the autocratic thug gave a shot about his country, he would have work to creat a democracy without all these factions going crazy. Instead, "Hey, no pressure, but you've got six months. Good luck."



Is it so necessary to you that their (new) form of g'ment be a democracy? Why is that?
My reality and yours are quite different.
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Really, is it possible to have a government that subscribes to Islam exist as a democracy?


Who cares?



Just wondering if it's possible or not. I don't think so, but I am not an expert on Islam or Muslims. (I do know more about both that most Americans, but that's not setting the bar very high, so I'm far from an expert)

Quote

If the autocratic thug gave a shot about his country, he would have work to creat a democracy without all these factions going crazy. Instead, "Hey, no pressure, but you've got six months. Good luck."



Is it so necessary to you that their (new) form of g'ment be a democracy? Why is that?



At the moment, absolutely nothing is necessary of their next government. That's the beautifula nd terrifying thing about sudden revolutions. I believe that a contitutional republic based on democratic principles is the best form of government, particularly when the constitution is well written. Because I believe that, I say that a leader who truly cares about his constituents will work towards individual liberty and a government whose purpose is to protect its citizens' rights. Mubarak was an autocratic thug. Hence the statement above.

However, if the people of Egypt go to the trouble of having a revolution and then settle for a government intent on running their entire life and squashing all dissent, well then why the hell did they bother in the first place? They had that already. But if they want to trade a dictator for a dictator who uses religion as justification, that's their problem. I wasn't planning on visiting anyway.
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Really, is it possible to have a government that subscribes to Islam exist as a democracy?



Sure, Turkey manages it ok as does the Maldives. So does Indonesia the largest Muslim country in the world which also happens to be a democracy of 238 million people. This nonsense about Islam being incompatible with democracy is total bull.
When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You do know Sukarno was appointed president in 1945 and remained so until 1998. Not exaclty democracy at its finest. Since 1998 things are significantly improviing, other than the fact that Indo was the ahrdest hit country in the Asian financial collapse of the late 90s. Since then the country and govt seem to be doing better, but is the govt really an Islamic govt, or is it a govt of secular laws run by guys who are Muslims?

As for Turkey, I can answer that for you, and you can confirm it on the country's website along with wiki, the cia fact book, and any other source you like.

Quote

Turkey is a democratic, secular, unitary, constitutional republic with has an ancient cultural heritage. Turkey is an independent Turkic state which has become increasingly integrated with the West through membership in organizations such as the Council of Europe, NATO, OECD, OSCE and the G-20 major economies.
...
Turkey has also fostered close cultural, political, economic and industrial relations with the Middle East, the Turkic states of Central Asia and the African countries through membership in organizations such as the Organisation of the Islamic Conference and the Economic Cooperation Organization. Given its strategic location, large economy and military strength, Turkey is a major regional power.



It is a country of secular laws run by guys who are Muslims and populated by Muslims. That's a far cry from an Islamic state.
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The question was is Islam compatible with democracy. No true Theocracy is compatible with democracy regardless of the religion. Islam as you are aware is not a religion that is practiced only on the Sabbath. The aforementioned countries are without an doubt Muslim countries, the fact that they are secular in their government but run by Muslims in a democracy clearly shows that there is no incompatibility between Islam and democracy. Its precisely this kind of model that Muslims across the Islamic world are moving towards with the people power movements we are now seeing. The media isn't broadcasting half of what is currently going on.
When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Agreed, but the question was not whether Islam and democracy are incompatible, but whether a government based on Islam can be democratic. The USA is overwhelmingly inhabited and run by Christians. But it is not a Christian country (thank God!) no matter how much some fundamental whackjobs here want to make it one.
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


I believe that a contitutional republic based on democratic principles is the best form of government, particularly when the constitution is well written.


Me too.
.
Quote

However, if the people of Egypt go to the trouble of having a revolution and then settle for a government intent on running their entire life and squashing all dissent, well then why the hell did they bother in the first place?



One of us us reading the mind of the other.
:D:D
My reality and yours are quite different.
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It is a country of secular laws run by guys who are Muslims and populated by Muslims. That's a far cry from an Islamic state.



The problem is that Westerners are so un-familiar with majority-Islamic societies, that they're skeered. Perhaps analogies might help. (Please, folks, don't nit-pick the minutiae.) Italy and Ireland have both been democratic republics for quite some time. But until fairly recently, conservative Catholic principles and mores were fairly well intertwined with their respective bodies of law. They weren't exactly "Catholic states", as is the Vatican, but in some regards, they came pretty close. So what you had were vibrant and more or less free democracies, but tinged with a hint of religiously-based parameters. Worked for them, for quite some time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I think thats a pretty good analogy



I think the educated women of Egypt need to start packing their bags and getting the hell out of there.. so as to miss the Islamic Way Back machine that is about to fire up.

Democracy there will be short lived lest we forget where many of the core individuals of Al-Queda came from.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
Quote

You do know Sukarno was appointed president in 1945 and remained so until 1998. Not exaclty democracy at its finest. Since 1998 things are significantly improviing, other than the fact that Indo was the ahrdest hit country in the Asian financial collapse of the late 90s. Since then the country and govt seem to be doing better, but is the govt really an Islamic govt, or is it a govt of secular laws run by guys who are Muslims?

As for Turkey, I can answer that for you, and you can confirm it on the country's website along with wiki, the cia fact book, and any other source you like.

Quote

Turkey is a democratic, secular, unitary, constitutional republic with has an ancient cultural heritage. Turkey is an independent Turkic state which has become increasingly integrated with the West through membership in organizations such as the Council of Europe, NATO, OECD, OSCE and the G-20 major economies.
...
Turkey has also fostered close cultural, political, economic and industrial relations with the Middle East, the Turkic states of Central Asia and the African countries through membership in organizations such as the Organisation of the Islamic Conference and the Economic Cooperation Organization. Given its strategic location, large economy and military strength, Turkey is a major regional power.



It is a country of secular laws run by guys who are Muslims and populated by Muslims. That's a far cry from an Islamic state.



meh - not for much longer. The islamofascist thugs are gaining strength every day. There are loud calls to do away with the secularist aspects of the government because they aren't "islamic enough".

mh
.
"The mouse does not know life until it is in the mouth of the cat."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
Quote

The question was is Islam compatible with democracy. No true Theocracy is compatible with democracy regardless of the religion. Islam as you are aware is not a religion that is practiced only on the Sabbath. The aforementioned countries are without an doubt Muslim countries, the fact that they are secular in their government but run by Muslims in a democracy clearly shows that there is no incompatibility between Islam and democracy. Its precisely this kind of model that Muslims across the Islamic world are moving towards with the people power movements we are now seeing. The media isn't broadcasting half of what is currently going on.



I don't know where to begin. islamofascism is on the rise everywhere in the Middle East because the mullahs are hollering every Friday (don't forget that there are practically more mosques than people over here - as many mosques in major cities as there are coffee shops in San Francisco) that the cult o' death is the answer to all of life's problems, most notably the corrupt, autocratic regimes. Well, that and blaming the USA and Israel for everything.

But it's a bullshit siren song of death. One need only look at Iran to see where this is all heading.

I agree with Kennedy - if one is going to simply overthrow a corrupt autocratic/kleptocratic thug, only to replace him with a bunch of corrupt islamofascist thugs (like in Iran) - why bother? Why don't people ever learn?

mh
.

remarks added
"The mouse does not know life until it is in the mouth of the cat."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
Quote

Quote

It is a country of secular laws run by guys who are Muslims and populated by Muslims. That's a far cry from an Islamic state.



The problem is that Westerners are so un-familiar with majority-Islamic societies, that they're skeered. Perhaps analogies might help. (Please, folks, don't nit-pick the minutiae.) Italy and Ireland have both been democratic republics for quite some time. But until fairly recently, conservative Catholic principles and mores were fairly well intertwined with their respective bodies of law. They weren't exactly "Catholic states", as is the Vatican, but in some regards, they came pretty close. So what you had were vibrant and more or less free democracies, but tinged with a hint of religiously-based parameters. Worked for them, for quite some time.



Yeah sure, and they use swords to behead people in the town square (up in Saudi, they make sure to push the Westerners to the front of the crowd so that they don't miss the spectacle).

If that isn't something to be "skeered" of, I don't know what is.

mh
.
"The mouse does not know life until it is in the mouth of the cat."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I think thats a pretty good analogy



I think the educated women of Egypt need to start packing their bags and getting the hell out of there.. so as to miss the Islamic Way Back machine that is about to fire up.

Democracy there will be short lived lest we forget where many of the core individuals of Al-Queda came from.


Islamic Way-back Machine. You owe me a keyboard Jeanne :D:D:D[:/]B|
Please don't dent the planet.

Destinations by Roxanne

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0