Kennedy 0 #1 February 1, 2011 Bill would require all S.D. citizens to buy a gun QuoteFive South Dakota lawmakers have introduced legislation that would require any adult 21 or older to buy a firearm “sufficient to provide for their ordinary self-defense.” The bill, which would take effect Jan. 1, 2012, would give people six months to acquire a firearm after turning 21. The provision does not apply to people who are barred from owning a firearm. Nor does the measure specify what type of firearm. Instead, residents would pick one “suitable to their temperament, physical capacity, and preference.” snipwitty subliminal message Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards. 1* Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,588 #2 February 1, 2011 We're not required to vote. Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,588 #3 February 1, 2011 As I mentioned in the PM I sent (nope, I didn't notice it was clicky There isn't a good solution. There isn't a pretty solution. But we're pretty sure we're not going to let the cute little 5-year-old die from septicemia because she couldn't afford the ER, and both costs and capabilities are going up nearly geometrically. Income is not. Wendy P. There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #4 February 2, 2011 QuoteBill would require all S.D. citizens to buy a gun QuoteFive South Dakota lawmakers have introduced legislation that would require any adult 21 or older to buy a firearm “sufficient to provide for their ordinary self-defense.” The bill, which would take effect Jan. 1, 2012, would give people six months to acquire a firearm after turning 21. The provision does not apply to people who are barred from owning a firearm. Nor does the measure specify what type of firearm. Instead, residents would pick one “suitable to their temperament, physical capacity, and preference.” snip Aw how cute.. so I spose you and Jon and Mark will be for this government mandated law that requires you to buy something Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #5 February 2, 2011 Quote Aw how cute.. so I spose you and Jon and Mark will be for this government mandated law that requires you to buy something guess we should poll them for their opinion on ObamaCare. I do suspect they'd start tap dancing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kennedy 0 #6 February 2, 2011 QuoteAw how cute.. so I spose you and Jon and Mark will be for this government mandated law that requires you to buy something Nope, not at all. I think is a good example of you missing the point. I agree wholeheartedly with the guy who proposed the bill, and hope it never becomes law. See the post above yours that quotes the rest of the article. I read the bill, and passing it would be as bad as ObamaCare. The difference is I'm consistently against this (and in good company with a number of courts). You seem to be a bit hypocritical in picking and chosing what the government should tell people what to buy.witty subliminal message Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards. 1* Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kennedy 0 #7 February 2, 2011 QuoteQuote Aw how cute.. so I spose you and Jon and Mark will be for this government mandated law that requires you to buy something guess we should poll them for their opinion on ObamaCare. I do suspect they'd start tap dancing. Congratulations, your telepathy machine is a bigger piece of shit than kallend's insanity-prediction machine.witty subliminal message Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards. 1* Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #8 February 2, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuote Aw how cute.. so I spose you and Jon and Mark will be for this government mandated law that requires you to buy something guess we should poll them for their opinion on ObamaCare. I do suspect they'd start tap dancing. Congratulations, your telepathy machine is a bigger piece of shit than kallend's insanity-prediction machine. SAME LAME STRAWMAN. I don't ask anyone to predict insanity, just to diligently report disqualifying conditions. I also ask that the state maintains its database, and that all purchases are given a background check - no exceptions. Doesn't infringe on anyone's rights.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #9 February 2, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuote Aw how cute.. so I spose you and Jon and Mark will be for this government mandated law that requires you to buy something guess we should poll them for their opinion on ObamaCare. I do suspect they'd start tap dancing. Congratulations, your telepathy machine is a bigger piece of shit than kallend's insanity-prediction machine. I could take any random sampling of 5 SD citizens and know that they will oppose ObamaCare. I do believe in fining legislators who put forth legislation they know is bad, "just to prove a point." Hanging is suitable when they openly admit as much. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #10 February 2, 2011 Quote I don't ask anyone to predict insanity, just to diligently report disqualifying conditions. Hey - this is getting pretty specific for you. and the list of disqualifying conditions? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #11 February 2, 2011 QuoteQuote I don't ask anyone to predict insanity, just to diligently report disqualifying conditions. Hey - this is getting pretty specific for you. and the list of disqualifying conditions? Posting suspect youtube videos.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgoose71 0 #12 February 2, 2011 QuoteQuoteAw how cute.. so I spose you and Jon and Mark will be for this government mandated law that requires you to buy something Nope, not at all. I think is a good example of you missing the point. I agree wholeheartedly with the guy who proposed the bill, and hope it never becomes law. See the post above yours that quotes the rest of the article. I read the bill, and passing it would be as bad as ObamaCare. The difference is I'm consistently against this (and in good company with a number of courts). You seem to be a bit hypocritical in picking and chosing what the government should tell people what to buy. I whole wholeheartedly agree with you. But if Obama-care passes, should take this law a step further? If you choose not to buy a gun, you should be fined. If you can't afford to buy a gun, the government should increase taxes on the rich to purchase a gun for you. And if you can't afford ammo, you should be given xxx rounds of your choice for your weapon. Your going to need them for your mandated shooting classes. After all, it's for your personal safety right? It's the governments job to keep us safe."There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." Life, the Universe, and Everything Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #13 February 2, 2011 Yes, but to really mirror the healthcare system we have right now, you should also be allowed to go to the firing range anytime you want, and if you can't afford ammo, the range has to provide it for you for free. Not the good stuff, but enough to keep you adequately trained. To pay for it, they just charge their other customers. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #14 February 2, 2011 QuoteAw how cute.. so I spose you and Jon and Mark will be for this government mandated law that requires you to buy something No, I'd bet none of them would support making it mandatory. I would not. However, you seem to think it is fine to mandate it when it comes to the things you like, and shriek at it when it comes to something you don't support.... How do you explain your incredible inconsistency? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #15 February 2, 2011 Quote Quote Aw how cute.. so I spose you and Jon and Mark will be for this government mandated law that requires you to buy something No, I'd bet none of them would support making it mandatory. I would not. However, you seem to think it is fine to mandate it when it comes to the things you like, and shriek at it when it comes to something you don't support.... How do you explain your incredible inconsistency? Probably because I do not get all my ideas from the BIG BUG BRAIN at the EIB loke so many of you do Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #16 February 2, 2011 QuoteProbably because I do not get all my ideas from the BIG BUG BRAIN at the EIB loke so many of you do Hey mods.... Isn't this a PA and hasn't she been warned? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #17 February 2, 2011 QuoteQuoteProbably because I do not get all my ideas from the BIG BUG BRAIN at the EIB loke so many of you do Hey mods.... Isn't this a PA and hasn't she been warned? Hey I am not the one of those who goes here then comes running here with the EDICTS from the BIG BUG BRAIN... Its amazing really .. its mentioned there.. and miraculously shows up here... moments later.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #18 February 2, 2011 QuoteHey I am not the one of those who goes here then comes running here with the EDICTS from the BIG BUG BRAIN... Its amazing really .. its mentioned there.. and miraculously shows up here... moments later.. I know you do not believe me... But I don't listen to Rush. I have stated that several times, and you just continue to ignore it. It does seem YOU listen to him since you seem to know everything he says. And yet you still are trying to play the player, not the ball. And rumor has it THAT is also considered a PA... Mods? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #19 February 2, 2011 QuoteQuoteHey I am not the one of those who goes here then comes running here with the EDICTS from the BIG BUG BRAIN... Its amazing really .. its mentioned there.. and miraculously shows up here... moments later.. I know you do not believe me... But I don't listen to Rush. I have stated that several times, and you just continue to ignore it. It does seem YOU listen to him since you seem to know everything he says. And yet you still are trying to play the player, not the ball. And rumor has it THAT is also considered a PA... Mods? How many times have YOU played the players over the last couple days again??? \IRONY METER........ SPROIIIIINNNNNNG Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #20 February 2, 2011 QuoteHow many times have YOU played the players over the last couple days again??? In every exchange between us... I ask you a simple question. You automatically go to the PA's every time. The next time, I do the same thing... you go to PA's again. Don't blame me for "returning fire" after you start acting silly. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davjohns 1 #21 February 2, 2011 I'm all for this law...comes with a public financed option, right? Seriously. This is almost what Israel does. Try finding a household that doesn't have a military weapon and multiple people qualified to use it. That's why people have to lob rockets at Israel. You don't dare walk in and start garbage.I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #22 February 2, 2011 QuoteQuoteHow many times have YOU played the players over the last couple days again??? In every exchange between us... I ask you a simple question. You automatically go to the PA's every time. The next time, I do the same thing... you go to PA's again. Don't blame me for "returning fire" after you start acting silly. DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE.. it is your modus operandi Search your posts.. for a clue.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #23 February 2, 2011 QuoteI'm all for this law...comes with a public financed option, right? Seriously. This is almost what Israel does. Try finding a household that doesn't have a military weapon and multiple people qualified to use it. That's why people have to lob rockets at Israel. You don't dare walk in and start garbage. I would be good with the training they all have to get as part of those RESPONSIBILITIES ... but that is not going to happen in this country. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #24 February 2, 2011 QuoteDUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE.. it is your modus operandi Yes, it is my method to try and get you to engage in civil debate in each new thread until you start the childish PA's. Regrettably, you have thus far been unable to avoid the PA's and been unable to discuss anything but the PA's. If you search the threads,,, you will see I ask you a question, you reply with BS. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #25 February 2, 2011 QuoteQuoteDUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE.. it is your modus operandi Yes, it is my method to try and get you to engage in civil debate in each new thread until you start the childish PA's. Regrettably, you have thus far been unable to avoid the PA's and been unable to discuss anything but the PA's. If you search the threads,,, you will see I ask you a question, you reply with BS. You do not want discusiion in your posts.. you are instead DEMANDING compliance.... are you a LEO??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
