0
normiss

Sorry Rahm!

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote



What is your answer to why more people voted for Emanuel Rahm, in the latest election, and not the other candidates.



I'm not a mind reader, but I suppose they thought he was the best candidate. That's usually the reason people vote for someone.



Pointless.



Take it up with DaVinci, he asked the incredibly STUPID questions to which my answers have been 100% correct.



Only if you want to avoid answering the questions posed or are afraid of having a specific position in the argument.



Why exactly am I supposed to know why other people do what they do? I'm not a mind reader, I'm not a psychologist, and I don't live in Chicago. The question, along with your response above, is just plain stupid.



Why don't you try using your best idea. I think they call that an intelligent guess. You can do that, right?
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote



What is your answer to why more people voted for Emanuel Rahm, in the latest election, and not the other candidates.



I'm not a mind reader, but I suppose they thought he was the best candidate. That's usually the reason people vote for someone.



Pointless.



Take it up with DaVinci, he asked the incredibly STUPID questions to which my answers have been 100% correct.



Only if you want to avoid answering the questions posed or are afraid of having a specific position in the argument.



Why exactly am I supposed to know why other people do what they do? I'm not a mind reader, I'm not a psychologist, and I don't live in Chicago. The question, along with your response above, is just plain stupid.



Why don't you try using your best idea. I think they call that an intelligent guess. You can do that, right?



If you're so interested, why don't you go first?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote



What is your answer to why more people voted for Emanuel Rahm, in the latest election, and not the other candidates.



I'm not a mind reader, but I suppose they thought he was the best candidate. That's usually the reason people vote for someone.



Pointless.



Take it up with DaVinci, he asked the incredibly STUPID questions to which my answers have been 100% correct.



Only if you want to avoid answering the questions posed or are afraid of having a specific position in the argument.



Why exactly am I supposed to know why other people do what they do? I'm not a mind reader, I'm not a psychologist, and I don't live in Chicago. The question, along with your response above, is just plain stupid.



Why don't you try using your best idea. I think they call that an intelligent guess. You can do that, right?



If you're so interested, why don't you go first?



Because I wasn't asked about it. I'm not the one avoiding answering the question, and I had nothing to do with the vote and do not live in the state.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote



What is your answer to why more people voted for Emanuel Rahm, in the latest election, and not the other candidates.



I'm not a mind reader, but I suppose they thought he was the best candidate. That's usually the reason people vote for someone.



Pointless.



Take it up with DaVinci, he asked the incredibly STUPID questions to which my answers have been 100% correct.



Only if you want to avoid answering the questions posed or are afraid of having a specific position in the argument.



Why exactly am I supposed to know why other people do what they do? I'm not a mind reader, I'm not a psychologist, and I don't live in Chicago. The question, along with your response above, is just plain stupid.



Why don't you try using your best idea. I think they call that an intelligent guess. You can do that, right?



If you're so interested, why don't you go first?



Because I wasn't asked about it. I'm not the one avoiding answering the question, and I had nothing to do with the vote and do not live in the state.



It wasn't a state vote, it was a city vote. I had nothing to do with the vote and do not live in the city.

I gave you my answers, which were 100% correct. Your problem if you don't like them.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote



What is your answer to why more people voted for Emanuel Rahm, in the latest election, and not the other candidates.



I'm not a mind reader, but I suppose they thought he was the best candidate. That's usually the reason people vote for someone.



Pointless.



Take it up with DaVinci, he asked the incredibly STUPID questions to which my answers have been 100% correct.



Only if you want to avoid answering the questions posed or are afraid of having a specific position in the argument.



Why exactly am I supposed to know why other people do what they do? I'm not a mind reader, I'm not a psychologist, and I don't live in Chicago. The question, along with your response above, is just plain stupid.



Why don't you try using your best idea. I think they call that an intelligent guess. You can do that, right?



If you're so interested, why don't you go first?



Because I wasn't asked about it. I'm not the one avoiding answering the question, and I had nothing to do with the vote and do not live in the state.



It wasn't a state vote, it was a city vote. I had nothing to do with the vote and do not live in the city.



Then instead of baiting, wouldn't it have been easier to deny interest or relevance?
Or were you intentionally trolling?
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote



What is your answer to why more people voted for Emanuel Rahm, in the latest election, and not the other candidates.



I'm not a mind reader, but I suppose they thought he was the best candidate. That's usually the reason people vote for someone.



Pointless.



Take it up with DaVinci, he asked the incredibly STUPID questions to which my answers have been 100% correct.



Only if you want to avoid answering the questions posed or are afraid of having a specific position in the argument.



Why exactly am I supposed to know why other people do what they do? I'm not a mind reader, I'm not a psychologist, and I don't live in Chicago. The question, along with your response above, is just plain stupid.



Why don't you try using your best idea. I think they call that an intelligent guess. You can do that, right?



If you're so interested, why don't you go first?



Because I wasn't asked about it. I'm not the one avoiding answering the question, and I had nothing to do with the vote and do not live in the state.



It wasn't a state vote, it was a city vote. I had nothing to do with the vote and do not live in the city.



Then instead of baiting, wouldn't it have been easier to deny interest or relevance?
Or were you intentionally trolling?



I gave my answers, which were 100% correct. Your problem if you don't like them.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Take it up with DaVinci, he asked the incredibly STUPID questions to which my answers have been 100% correct.



I answered questions that could be answered in two ways:

1. The intellectually honest way to further discussion
2. The childish semantic way to end discussion.

You pick #2 all the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Take it up with DaVinci, he asked the incredibly STUPID questions to which my answers have been 100% correct.



I answered questions that could be answered in two ways:

1. The intellectually honest way to further discussion
2. The childish semantic way to end discussion.

You pick #2 all the time.



Why do you expect me to be a mind reader? Ask a sensible question for a change.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Take it up with DaVinci, he asked the incredibly STUPID questions to which my answers have been 100% correct.



I answered questions that could be answered in two ways:

1. The intellectually honest way to further discussion
2. The childish semantic way to end discussion.

You pick #2 all the time.



Why do you expect me to be a mind reader? Ask a sensible question for a change.



Because you attempt it so often in so many other threads.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



yeah, different year, same arguments by the same people. amazing. f*cking amazing.

the more things change the more things stay the same - for some.



Hiya Michael - we can gin up an argument about the Pope and birth control if ya want... :P:):D
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



yeah, different year, same arguments by the same people. amazing. f*cking amazing.

the more things change the more things stay the same - for some.



Hiya Michael - we can gin up an argument about the Pope and birth control if ya want... :P:):D


Have a pancake.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

But it's not breakfast time yet...



Pancakes are good at anytime - even when on a bunny.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



yeah, different year, same arguments by the same people. amazing. f*cking amazing.

the more things change the more things stay the same - for some.



Hiya Michael - we can gin up an argument about the Pope and birth control if ya want... :P:):D


hiya back Mike!!!

I miss Lee.
And JP.
And Chris. And...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Why do you expect me to be a mind reader?



No, I keep expecting you to answer a question honestly instead of tap dancing like hell to avoid giving an honest answer.

It is a pretty common tactic of yours to avoid the intent and instead dance around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0