rhaig 0 #26 January 23, 2011 Quote I will represent whichever side pays me a nice retainer first. what do you call 10000 lawyers in a hole at the bottom of the ocean?-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jrmrangers 0 #27 January 23, 2011 a good start!! Wait , I pull what first? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnMitchell 16 #28 January 24, 2011 Quote Given that it is impossible to tell her age, that she looked under age, and the intent was for her to appear or be under age given the title of the pic or web site...it was wrong to post it. I only gazed upon her for, well, it was under a minute by far. She didn't look under aged at all. She seemed to be similar in age to many, many legal playmates in Hef's mag. She was wearing lingerie, fairly conservatively for what goes these days. Hardly hardcore pornography. The intent was for her to look teenage. Whatever. A quick glance thru any store carrying adult literature shows that "teen" is a popular category. They are very adamant that that means 8-teen and 9-teen. hardly pedophilia. Those publishers wish to avoid jail time. I'm sure most commercial internet sites would feel the same. I understand the need to draw some lines on what's acceptable and what's not. But occasionally even the best mods can jump offsides. To err is human, to forgive divine. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnMitchell 16 #29 January 24, 2011 QuoteIf the banning is unjust, the person who manages this site has a small delimma. To reverse the banning could undermine the authority of the Moderator. To admit a mistake increases a person's authority, in my eyes. It shows self confidence and a sense of fairness. I often have to make time critical decisions. Sometimes I have to admit making errors and change my course of action. The sooner the better, I say. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
