billvon 3,132 #76 January 14, 2011 >Garbage in, garbage out. So now you're saying the historical data you're posting isn't valid again? You could give RushMC a run for his money on how fast you change your story to fit your agenda. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #77 January 14, 2011 Quote>Garbage in, garbage out. So now you're saying the historical data you're posting isn't valid again? No, I'm saying that, like usual, GISS has 'added value' to the readings - sort of like the changes they made to the 1930's records. QuoteYou could give RushMC a run for his money on how fast you change your story to fit your agenda. "Play the ball, not the player"...Mr. Moderator.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #78 January 15, 2011 Just wait, I have it on good authority that the GISS is in the processes of a downward revision of the temp data for 2010. They just have to wait for a Holliday weekend Friday to release it. Seriously this will happen in the next two months. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
