Recommended Posts
billvon 3,118
Not much of one. She's just lost her favorite rhetorical device. Not even the most brain-dead right winger is going to use the bullseye/crosshair/reload/target analogies on their opponents after this incident.
rushmc 23
QuoteQuoteQuoteDude - even liberal commentators are saying it's bullshit to try to pin it on her. Time to give it up.
And maybe you should see someone about that obsession you have with her.
they cant
she is a threat
Not after this she isn't - you can bet on it.
really?
so you think it is sticking and it is right to stick?
If so, I hope you dont have any guns
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
rushmc 23
Quote>they cant . . . she is a threat
Not much of one. She's just lost her favorite rhetorical device. Not even the most brain-dead right winger is going to use the bullseye/crosshair/reload/target analogies on their opponents after this incident.


Then many politions hopes have been dashed by this


Your jokes are getting better
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
rehmwa 2
Quote>Not even the most brain-dead right winger
that is clearly a statement designed to incite retaliatory violence against rep house members
actually it's designed to ESCALATE (as the congresswoman is merely brain damaged, but this incites brain death)
...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants
QuoteNot much of one. She's just lost her favorite rhetorical device. Not even the most brain-dead right winger is going to use the bullseye/crosshair/reload/target analogies on their opponents after this incident.
Maybe they can use this.
Oops, my bad. Liberals already used it.
Try not to worry about the things you have no control over
billvon 3,118
Tasteless. Do you think there should be more or less of this?
QuoteDude - even liberal commentators are saying it's bullshit to try to pin it on her. Time to give it up.
And maybe you should see someone about that obsession you have with her.
they cant
she is a threat
She's not a threat, more like the boogey woman of GOP politics. Spends her life running around with mind/mouth half cocked. The Democrats will love to see her running for President, and will use every opportunity she gives them to associate her with the GOP. Unlike H Clinton, who is also widely disliked, Palin is even more widely unrespected as a light weight mind.
QuoteTasteless. Do you think there should be more or less of this?
I agree, I thought it was tasteless. But some in the Liberal Party of Canada thought it was so funny they posted it on their official party website in December of 2009. We are not talking about some fringe website here. This is an official political party that wants to form government. It's the equivalent of the Republicans or Democrats posting such a picture on their official websites.
So you are asking the wrong person here. Ask the Liberals why they posted it.
Try not to worry about the things you have no control over
mnealtx 0
Quote>they cant . . . she is a threat
Not much of one. She's just lost her favorite rhetorical device. Not even the most brain-dead right winger is going to use the bullseye/crosshair/reload/target analogies on their opponents after this incident.
Bet the DCCC and DLC continue to do so, and none of you will even peep about it, like now....the same old double standard.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
rushmc 23
QuoteQuoteTasteless. Do you think there should be more or less of this?
I agree, I thought it was tasteless. But some in the Liberal Party of Canada thought it was so funny they posted it on their official party website in December of 2009. We are not talking about some fringe website here. This is an official political party that wants to form government. It's the equivalent of the Republicans or Democrats posting such a picture on their official websites.
So you are asking the wrong person here. Ask the Liberals why they posted it.
They can get away with it becaue libs are insightful, artfull or making a point
Conservatives do it and it is hate speech
And that concludes the lesson of the day

if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
billvon 3,118
Me too. We need less of that, not more of it.
kallend 2,148
Classier than the blood libel from the Left over the last several days, given that there is exactly ZERO evidence that Loehner was a follower or reader of Palin or the Tea Party.
Hmmm - suddenly that phrase has become popular.
Proof positive that you get your ridiculous ideas from the RW talking heads.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
rushmc 23
Quote[reply
Classier than the blood libel from the Left over the last several days, given that there is exactly ZERO evidence that Loehner was a follower or reader of Palin or the Tea Party.
Hmmm - suddenly that phrase has become popular.
Proof positive that you get your ridiculous ideas from the RW talking heads.
If you lefties want to have a go with talking points let me know
this will be a game you loose badly
giddy up fella

if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
Andy9o8 2
Quote[reply
Classier than the blood libel from the Left over the last several days, given that there is exactly ZERO evidence that Loehner was a follower or reader of Palin or the Tea Party.
Hmmm - suddenly that phrase has become popular.
Proof positive that you get your ridiculous ideas from the RW talking heads.
I hear that Palin makes mooseburgers from the blood of Democratic babies.
billvon 3,118
"When you start to accuse people of having the blood of innocent people on their hands, it incites violence."
So which is it? Can mere rhetoric incite violence or not?
rushmc 23
QuotePalin is circling the drain. Just after she claimed that it was absurd that mere talking can be in any way related to violence, she said this:
"When you start to accuse people of having the blood of innocent people on their hands, it incites violence."
So which is it? Can mere rhetoric incite violence or not?
Thanks poster boy
You are the leaders of your type
I have no choice but to enjoy your misconseptions
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
billvon 3,118
I think the image below is the perfect poster boy for all of this. From a screen grab of his website.
kallend 2,148
Quote>Thanks poster boy
I think the image below is the perfect poster boy for all of this. From a screen grab of his website.


That shows him for the hypocrite he is.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
kallend 2,148
QuoteQuotePalin is circling the drain. Just after she claimed that it was absurd that mere talking can be in any way related to violence, she said this:
"When you start to accuse people of having the blood of innocent people on their hands, it incites violence."
So which is it? Can mere rhetoric incite violence or not?
Thanks poster boy
You are the leaders of your type
I have no choice but to enjoy your misconseptions
You really do a disservice to your position by writing so poorly. It leads the reader to have a very poor impression of you.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
mnealtx 0
Quote[reply
Classier than the blood libel from the Left over the last several days, given that there is exactly ZERO evidence that Loehner was a follower or reader of Palin or the Tea Party.
Hmmm - suddenly that phrase has become popular.
Proof positive that you get your ridiculous ideas from the RW talking heads.
Yup...that fringe-right Wall Street Journal...on the 10th of January.
Once again, you *fail*.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
mnealtx 0
QuotePalin is circling the drain.
Is that another one of your predictions like "The GOP will not get control of either the House or Senate this election cycle"?
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
Not after this she isn't - you can bet on it.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites