0
Guest

"We Told You So": The David Epstein Incest Case

Recommended Posts

Guest
I'm looking forward to seeing women marrying dogs, myself.

Don't bother defending the indefensible.

DADT is just the beginning of the end - and you can see it from here. :(

mh

.
"The mouse does not know life until it is in the mouth of the cat."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I'm looking forward to seeing women marrying dogs, myself.

Dogs are capable of legally binding contracts? See, this is why I come to Speaker's Corner, I learn new stuff every day.

Mark, why are you so obsessed with everyone else's sexuality? Got some control issues?

Don
_____________________________________
Tolerance is the cost we must pay for our adventure in liberty. (Dworkin, 1996)
“Education is not filling a bucket, but lighting a fire.” (Yeats)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I'm looking forward to seeing women marrying dogs, myself.

Dogs are capable of legally binding contracts? See, this is why I come to Speaker's Corner, I learn new stuff every day.

Mark, why are you so obsessed with everyone else's sexuality? Got some control issues?

Don



No more than you have being responcible issues
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

No more than you have being responcible issues

In English, please? Also American will do, I'm bilingual.

Have to go to work now; have a good afternoon.

Don
_____________________________________
Tolerance is the cost we must pay for our adventure in liberty. (Dworkin, 1996)
“Education is not filling a bucket, but lighting a fire.” (Yeats)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I'm looking forward to seeing women marrying dogs, myself.

People used the same logic when the issue of interracial marriage came up. Marrying blacks was like marrying monkeys, to many bigots of the time, and would lead quickly down the slippery slope to bestiality and all manner of horrors.

Yet here we are 50 years later. Not too many monkeys getting married to people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, congratulations on extrapolating a singular even into the end of civilization.

Seriously. How often does the 20-year-old daughter suddenly get the urge to bang her old man?

Right, wrong or indifferent, I just don't think THAT happens too often.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting article. I had not thought about incest in regards to the advent of gay rights movements. I HAD thought of polygamy, though.

It seems to me that if we are going to condone gay relationships, we have to condone polygamous relationships. Polygamy has a long historical and even biblical basis. Why is it illegal?
I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet..

But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It seems to me that if we are going to condone gay relationships, we have to condone polygamous relationships. Polygamy has a long historical and even biblical basis. Why is it illegal?



Because somebody finally figured out it wasn't a good idea to have a lot of women's cycles get in sync under one roof. Well anyway, not if you're the guy. ;)
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

It seems to me that if we are going to condone gay relationships, we have to condone polygamous relationships. Polygamy has a long historical and even biblical basis. Why is it illegal?



Because somebody finally figured out it wasn't a good idea to have a lot of women's cycles get in sync under one roof. Well anyway, not if you're the guy. ;)


Here's a spoof on that from Jody Lynn Nye.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


It seems to me that if we are going to condone gay relationships, we have to condone polygamous relationships. Polygamy has a long historical and even biblical basis. Why is it illegal?



It would be a spectacular tax dodge. Other than that, no valid reason other than disdain for the Mormon sect of Christianity.

So if we ever divorce the cultural notion of marriage from the federal benefits of a civil union, then there's no reason the polygamists can't have at it.

As others have suggested, the number of people interested in [consensual, adult age] incest is pretty low, self limiting. A lot of the arguments in the cited article weren't very compelling however. Lots of people engaging in oral/anal sex only still manage to get pregnant. And birth control (even the injectables) fails often enough that this isn't a valid reason to ignore the reproductive issues. That leaves us with the sterilized, and the non blood relations (step children).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

It seems to me that if we are going to condone gay relationships, we have to condone polygamous relationships. Polygamy has a long historical and even biblical basis. Why is it illegal?



Because somebody finally figured out it wasn't a good idea to have a lot of women's cycles get in sync under one roof. Well anyway, not if you're the guy. ;)


That is why its much better to support polyandry... men wear out so easily

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

It seems to me that if we are going to condone gay relationships, we have to condone polygamous relationships. Polygamy has a long historical and even biblical basis. Why is it illegal?



Because somebody finally figured out it wasn't a good idea to have a lot of women's cycles get in sync under one roof. Well anyway, not if you're the guy. ;)


That explains why it is a BAD IDEA; not why the government feels the need to get involved.
I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet..

But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0