Recommended Posts
Bolas 5
Quote
So you're saying there is no point to believe or follow something if you can't prove it?
Not at all, atheism is a fascinating logical flow of thought that has an objective to justify the hedonistic self deified soul. Its premise is based on faith and totally lacks any scientific validation.
No. Its premise is based on lack of faith and
If ya can't be good, look good, if that fails, make 'em laugh.
beowulf 1
QuoteNot at all, atheism is a fascinating logical flow of thought that has an objective to justify the hedonistic self deified soul.
This is entirely your opinion. The definition of atheism is the disbelief in ANY deity.
QuoteIts premise is based on faith and totally lacks any scientific validation.
This couldn't be more opposite to what atheism is about.
Andy9o8 2
Quote
So you're saying there is no point to believe or follow something if you can't prove it?
Not at all, atheism is a fascinating logical flow of thought that has an objective to justify the hedonistic self deified soul. Its premise is based on faith and totally lacks any scientific validation.
That's completely full of shit. See Bolas, Beowulf and TiaSafeMode, above.
jakee 1,564
QuoteReally!? So Why did the OP feel the need to tell everyone about his non-belief? Why is it when I post I don't care about your non-belief all of the atheists here seem to get defensive about it?
If you don't care about our non-belief, why are you complaining about the OP talking about it?
If you're "not going to try and lump all the atheists together", why are you talking about "all of the atheists"?
You might want to reconsider the boundaries of your so-called tolerance.
jakee 1,564
QuoteNot at all, atheism is a fascinating logical flow of thought that has an objective to justify the hedonistic self deified soul.
And, once again, the prison demographics really support that argument, don't they? All those atheists breaking the law, doing whatever they want...
skygirl1 1
skyrider 0
QuoteQuoteYou think you talk for all Athiest??
If you ask me, you are not an athiest, your one of those "activist" that like using the name..IMO
Hang on, hang on - you accuse him of trying to speak for all atheists and in the same breath say that he isn't really an atheist because he doesn't think the same way as you?
You didn't really think that through, did you?
i was hopin no one would catch that...(brain wasn;t clickin)

Apparently you didn't read his original post correctly. He merely stated that he respected the thoughts of Ricky Gervais, he wasn't shoving atheism down our throats. Nobody forced you to open up the thread and read it. You could've just passed over it if you didn't agree with it.
I don't care that you don't care about what I do or don't believe in. I'm not the one offended. I'm merely pointing out problems with your argument. You seem to be the one offended that Gervais has a plausable explanation for the lack of evidence that there ever was, or is, a God.
D.S. #8.8
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites