muff528 3 #26 November 28, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuote ... Sometimes it's just "leader." How does that go in German? Try Google or ask Rockwell. Nicht notwendig - es war rhetorisch. Wer ist Rockwell? I think the self-imposed title "Leader" had more to do with the Enabling Act and combining the Presidency and Chancellory than it did with simply being "Chancellor". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chancellor_of_Germany Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #27 November 28, 2010 The following comments are generic and are not directed at one specific dizzy.com user: Watching the first video it is rather hilarious observing the Liberal media defend the Bush's all because Palin speaks out against the Bush's economic policies? Seriously Liberals are defending the Bush's now? Too funny ... then it is equally funny listening to Liberals whine once again when Palin speaks out on her opinion that "parents should be making decisions on how their children are raised versus the nanny state government deciding on how children are raised". I ask this, who should be raising the children of the world? Their parents or governments? If you answered that governments should be raising children, well then I must say I want nothing to do with the world you want to live in. Liberals get the #### out of my life. It's my life, not yours, I should get to decide how to live it. I am sick and tired of Liberals and their social engineering agenda. But this is where my defense of Palin ends. She obviously made a brain fart when mentioning "North Korea" as an ally when it is the South who is the ally. We all make slip of the tongue mistakes, but when someone wants to have a high profile very public job, the smallest errors are dissected and criticized. Sarah Palin is NOT presidential material. The Republicans will be offering the community organizer turned junior senator who has visited 57 states and yet was still marketed by Hollywood as "the Messiah savior of the world" a 2nd term if Palin is the Republican candidate. Obama ... is not qualified to be president (yet some how he is). Palin ... is also not qualified to be president. Is there any wonder why I still like "None of the Above" to lead the USA. Then again does it really matter who is president? Obama (like all the previous presidents) are nothing more than puppets. If you think the USA is a democracy, maybe I can interest you in some beach front property in Bangladesh. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyrider 0 #28 November 28, 2010 Yep , being run by a queen has worked out much better for you than our government! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #29 November 28, 2010 The Queen of England (if that is who you are referring to), is no queen on mine. I never have and never will pledge allegiance to the British Monarchy (even though I must admit I get a woody when I think of Kate Middleton ... jaja ... but Kate is cool. She is an outsider. She is this commoner who somehow has found herself on the inside of royalty). Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
millertimeunc 0 #30 November 28, 2010 "If you think the USA is a democracy, maybe I can interest you in some beach front property in Bangladesh." Uh, Bangladesh has a pretty sizable coastline, or were you more referring to the fact that it's just a shit-hole country? The best things in life are dangerous. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites