jtval 0 #26 November 10, 2010 It's not Meg who says that. its the host. back it up to the 9:30 mark and listen through to 11:00. it's clearly not meg who says that.My photos My Videos Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyrider 0 #27 November 10, 2010 It IS the woman on teh phone... start at 1022 LISTEN ...(and I said I wouldn't listen again) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jtval 0 #28 November 10, 2010 skyrider, the personon the phone is a woman (Meg) being interviewed by a radio show... two men and a woman. the woman is the one you think is Meg. The voice is clearly not Meg. Honestly if you can't distinguish between the two you may need better speakers or a hearing test.My photos My Videos Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyrider 0 #29 November 10, 2010 Quoteskyrider, the personon the phone is a woman (Meg) being interviewed by a radio show... two men and a woman. the woman is the one you think is Meg. The voice is clearly not Meg. Honestly if you can't distinguish between the two you may need better speakers or a hearing test. Mibus yoru smart ass sounding words, I AM tone Deaf.(steal worker for too long)...that is the first I ever hear of another female(supposedly) being involved in the show, and all word following fit what she just said... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jtval 0 #30 November 10, 2010 Quote Mibus yoru smart ass sounding words, I AM tone Deaf.(steal worker for too long)...that is the first I ever hear of another female(supposedly) being involved in the show, and all word following fit what she just said... No reason to get offensive. I know its SC and that what people do here. I'm just letting you know that if you can't tell the diff in the voice there is something wrong.My photos My Videos Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyrider 0 #31 November 10, 2010 Quote Quote Mibus yoru smart ass sounding words, I AM tone Deaf.(steal worker for too long)...that is the first I ever hear of another female(supposedly) being involved in the show, and all word following fit what she just said... No reason to get offensive. I know its SC and that what people do here. I'm just letting you know that if you can't tell the diff in the voice there is something wrong. Kewl...admitted I am tone deaf...comes in handy, I camp a lot, and can;t hear crickets! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wildcard451 0 #32 November 10, 2010 Quote Kewl...admitted I am tone deaf...comes in handy, I camp a lot, and can;t hear crickets! Right on. That would explain it. Really wasn't trying to get into a pissing contest. If you can't tell the difference in the tones I can see how you would get confused. My apologies for being a dick. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #33 November 10, 2010 The very first of the video - states that "One of our OTHER female co-hosts" I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #34 November 10, 2010 Quote that is the first I ever hear of another female(supposedly) being involved in the show, and all word following fit what she just said... Actually the Co-Host is first heard at about 1:20 saying "Smoking Hot" Meg did NOT describe herself that way, she just giggled a little.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyrider 0 #35 November 10, 2010 Quote Quote Kewl...admitted I am tone deaf...comes in handy, I camp a lot, and can;t hear crickets! Right on. That would explain it. Really wasn't trying to get into a pissing contest. If you can't tell the difference in the tones I can see how you would get confused. My apologies for being a dick. I buy ya a beer , if we ever meet! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #36 November 10, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Kewl...admitted I am tone deaf...comes in handy, I camp a lot, and can;t hear crickets! Right on. That would explain it. Really wasn't trying to get into a pissing contest. If you can't tell the difference in the tones I can see how you would get confused. My apologies for being a dick. I buy ya a beer , if we ever meet! That is really awesome of you to offer, Billy!I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #37 November 10, 2010 Quote I wonder what legal standing she has for the destruction of her property. what, for tearing up her ticket? The one that got replaced by the airline?-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #38 November 10, 2010 QuoteQuote I wonder what legal standing she has for the destruction of her property. what, for tearing up her ticket? The one that got replaced by the airline? Was it? And yes, it sounds to me that was a malicious, threatening, terroristic thing to do. Not only should that TSA person be fired, she should be fined.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,611 #39 November 10, 2010 QuoteJEZZUs FUCKIN KKkkeeerist..."SHE" says, I'm such a loud mouth" LISTEN from (to be safe) 10:20, to 10:50...She admits talking loud and complaining....She flagged herself...with those actions... Dude, you need to get your hearing tested! Seriously, a couple of decades of plane rides can really take a toll on the old ear-drums...Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #40 November 10, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuote I wonder what legal standing she has for the destruction of her property. what, for tearing up her ticket? The one that got replaced by the airline? Was it? And yes, it sounds to me that was a malicious, threatening, terroristic thing to do. Not only should that TSA person be fired, she should be fined. yes, towards the end she explained that the guy behind the airline counter printed her a replacement, and suggested she find a different airport. malicious, threatening and terroristic? sure. but if she brought destruction of property charges, they should be thrown out. she suffered no loss of property.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #41 November 10, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote I wonder what legal standing she has for the destruction of her property. what, for tearing up her ticket? The one that got replaced by the airline? Was it? And yes, it sounds to me that was a malicious, threatening, terroristic thing to do. Not only should that TSA person be fired, she should be fined. yes, towards the end she explained that the guy behind the airline counter printed her a replacement, and suggested she find a different airport. malicious, threatening and terroristic? sure. but if she brought destruction of property charges, they should be thrown out. she suffered no loss of property. My bet is that the airport manager made that happen to avoid the suit that was to be brought once he found out that that is what the TSA bitch did. She should still be fired and fined. i see no difference in what the TSA did there and what the guy did to that woman that got her head stepped on.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #42 November 10, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote I wonder what legal standing she has for the destruction of her property. what, for tearing up her ticket? The one that got replaced by the airline? Was it? And yes, it sounds to me that was a malicious, threatening, terroristic thing to do. Not only should that TSA person be fired, she should be fined. yes, towards the end she explained that the guy behind the airline counter printed her a replacement, and suggested she find a different airport. malicious, threatening and terroristic? sure. but if she brought destruction of property charges, they should be thrown out. she suffered no loss of property. My bet is that the airport manager made that happen to avoid the suit that was to be brought once he found out that that is what the TSA bitch did. She should still be fired and fined. i see no difference in what the TSA did there and what the guy did to that woman that got her head stepped on. one thing to note is that that piece of paper probably has on it in fine print somewhere that "this ticket is the property of the issuing airline and can be revoked at any time" or something to that effect. so first, she suffered no loss of property or money because of the incident, and second, the destroyed piece of paper was not likely her property anyway to begin with. don't get me wrong, I'm not defending the TSA agent. it's total bullshit that this happened. But tearing of the ticket is the minor part of the incident. and to compare it to assault and battery? seriously?-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #43 November 10, 2010 Quote one thing to note is that that piece of paper probably has on it in fine print somewhere that "this ticket is the property of the issuing airline and can be revoked at any time" or something to that effect. so first, she suffered no loss of property or money because of the incident, and second, the destroyed piece of paper was not likely her property anyway to begin with. don't get me wrong, I'm not defending the TSA agent. it's total bullshit that this happened. But tearing of the ticket is the minor part of the incident. and to compare it to assault and battery? seriously? I wasn't aware that the TSA Agent was a representative of the airline that issued the ticket, if so, then you would be correct. If not then that agent destroyed her property since it was not repossesed by the issuing airline. It is pretty obvious that the TSA was trying to incite her to something, or escalate the situation by provocation. The agent should be fired and fined, and that fine should be delivered to the affected party, namely, Meg.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #44 November 11, 2010 Quote I wasn't aware that the TSA Agent was a representative of the airline that issued the ticket, if so, then you would be correct. If not then that agent destroyed her property since it was not repossesed by the issuing airline. my point was that is not the property of the passenger. you missed that apparently, or you disagree but did not state that you disagree, Quote It is pretty obvious that the TSA was trying to incite her to something, or escalate the situation by provocation. The agent should be fired and fined, and that fine should be delivered to the affected party, namely, Meg. that is for a court to decide, though I can see by your responses to me that your mind is made up and you're not listening to discussion on the topic. if there are charges to be filed, they will not center around destruction of a small piece of paper that may or may not have legally been her property. The will be centered around the actions of the TSA agents present.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #45 November 11, 2010 Quote that is for a court to decide, though I can see by your responses to me that your mind is made up and you're not listening to discussion on the topic. if there are charges to be filed, they will not center around destruction of a small piece of paper that may or may not have legally been her property. The will be centered around the actions of the TSA agents present. My mind is as made up as it can be at this point.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NickDG 23 #46 November 11, 2010 >>We are slowly becoming a country of mice...As someone who took part in political protesting in the face of loaded guns in the 1970s, I take exception to that observation. If "slowly becoming" was a train you were trying to catch, well, you missed it, bro . . . We now live in a country where Republican nabobs like John Shimkus is quoting the bible (instead of science) that global warming isn't something to worry about because God said he wouldn't destroy the Earth after Noah's flood. We now live in a country where the majority believes intrusive breeches of the search and seizure laws are fine and throw in "As long as you're not doing anything wrong what are you worrying about?" We now live in a country where the vice principal who reddened my ass with a ping pong paddle back in the third grade would go to prison toay. I'd like to find that fellow now and shake his hand with gratitude. We now live in a country where too many believe most of what they see and all of what they hear. FOX news proves that point everyday. And we know live in a country that elected not once, but twice, an intellectual moron named Bush to occupy the same office as Abraham Lincoln. I've never been a doomsayer as I've always believed America was strong enough to withstand any attack from outside our boarders, any attack by misguided politicians like Joe McCarthy and Sarah Palin. Any great hardships like the dust bowl, two world wars, and the great depression. But one thing we won't survive is a general population not grounded in good old American common sense and hard work. But we can't do anything with our hands anymore, we've become a nation of paper pushers who feel entitled to a million dollars a year in salary. When that didn't pan out we created new enemies to blame it on so now it's the Muslims, the Mexicans, and the Chinese who are the bogymen. Back when I was a young boy in the early sixties I recall asking my father if we were Republicans or Democrats? Dad, who was busy raising five children on the salary of a Barber and who probably never had time for a political thought in his life answered, "We're Democrats, the Republicans are for rich people." Could that be any clearer than it is today? NickD Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
