turtlespeed 226 #1 October 25, 2010 I was at the gulf this past weekend and drove my truck out on the beach. Left the truck there for 4 or five hours and now the ocean spary and the wind has coated it with oil. Nasty Stuff - Windshield Wipers can't get it off. Should I make a claim to BP about needing to have my truck detailed again?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #2 October 25, 2010 Quote Should I make a claim to BP about needing to have my truck detailed again? nope - call your congressman or even the pres about it and let him get some mileage out of your personal tragedy never waste a tragedy by doing it yourself ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyrider 0 #3 October 25, 2010 Quote I was at the gulf this past weekend and drove my truck out on the beach. Left the truck there for 4 or five hours and now the ocean spary and the wind has coated it with oil. Nasty Stuff - Windshield Wipers can't get it off.Should I make a claim to BP about needing to have my truck detailed again? first contact FEMA.....they will send you food and vouchers.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #4 October 25, 2010 >Should I make a claim to BP about needing to have my truck detailed >again? ?? I think you owe them an apology for stealing their oil! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #5 October 25, 2010 obuma walked all the way to the blowout site and plugged the leak, detailing your car should be a snap. and he managed to blame it on bush and how bush killed N.O. with katrina. obuma is your best bet ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #6 October 25, 2010 I just wanted to see what it would be like to be a liberal for a while and force someone else to pay for something that I wanted.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #7 October 25, 2010 >I just wanted to see what it would be like to be a liberal for a while and force >someone else to pay for something that I wanted. I see. I guess it's time to go back to being a conservative and forcing people to pay for extra wars, border security, military systems and entitlement programs. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #8 October 25, 2010 conservatives are in favor of entitlements ? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #9 October 25, 2010 >conservatives are in favor of entitlements ? Yep. Just try to cut veteran's hospital funding. You'll get called all sorts of names. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #10 October 25, 2010 Quote>conservatives are in favor of entitlements ? Yep. Just try to cut veteran's hospital funding. You'll get called all sorts of names. liberals are against veteran's hospital funding? ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #11 October 25, 2010 >liberals are against veteran's hospital funding? He's a liberal? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #12 October 25, 2010 Quote I was at the gulf this past weekend and drove my truck out on the beach. Left the truck there for 4 or five hours and now the ocean spary and the wind has coated it with oil. Nasty Stuff - Windshield Wipers can't get it off.Should I make a claim to BP about needing to have my truck detailed again? I would not call anybody The gov and the EPA would classify it at an envio hazard and you may never see it again"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #13 October 25, 2010 QuoteThe gov and the EPA would classify it at an envio hazard and you may never see it again but, that would downgrade it's tradein value and you can reclassify it as a "clunker" - and if you're one of the first 1000 people to trade it in as a "clunker", and you give the government all your credit card numbers - you might win a 'prize'. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StreetScooby 5 #14 October 26, 2010 Though we've never met, you've always struck me as a oily kind of guy We are all engines of karma Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #15 October 26, 2010 Quote Though we've never met, you've always struck me as a oily kind of guy the oily boid catcher the woim ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #16 October 26, 2010 Quote Quote Though we've never met, you've always struck me as a oily kind of guy the oily boid catcher the woim ! Oh I am pretty sure there is a catcher there..... but that ain't really a worm... even IF it looks like one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BIGUN 1,488 #17 October 26, 2010 Quoteare in favor of entitlements ? Yep. Just try to cut veteran's hospital funding. You'll get called all sorts of names. Please don't commingle a Veteran's "Benefits" with "Entitlements." And, please don't confuse "Entitlements" with "Welfare."Nobody has time to listen; because they're desperately chasing the need of being heard. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #18 October 26, 2010 >Please don't commingle a Veteran's "Benefits" with "Entitlements." From the list of entitlement programs from the US Budget of 1992: (in millions) Medicaid $118,067 AFDC 24,923 Food Stamps 24,918 Supplemental Security Income 22,774 Lower income housing asst. 12,307 Veterans medical care 7,838 Social Services (Title 20) 5,419 Pell Grants 5,374 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BIGUN 1,488 #19 October 26, 2010 >From the list of entitlement programs from the US Budget of 1992: (in millions) Ahhh, the year we began to "label" everything as "Entitlements." QuoteHistorically, Medicare and Social Security have been presented to the public as two separate programs. Recently, policymakers have begun to use the term entitlements to refer to these two programs, as well as a number of other federal programs. Because the term entitlement is now commonly used in public discourse about the nation’s budgetary problems, our survey examined how well people understand this term and how they relate it to specific federal government programs. The survey divided knowledge of the term entitlement into two parts (Exhibit 1). In the first part, respondents were read four broad descriptions and asked whether or not each one was an entitlement. Two-thirds (68 percent) of respondents said that basic rights guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution were entitlements. This answer reflects the broad definition that many Americans associate with the term. On each of the other three items, about six in ten respondents gave the correct response. Tax credits for working poor persons were correctly identified as an entitlement by 61 percent, and 57 percent correctly categorized federal government programs in which by law certain persons are guaranteed cash payments or health insurance benefits. Fifty-seven percent said correctly that tax deductions for wealthy persons were not entitlements. In the second part, we read respondents a list of eleven specific federal government programs and tax deductions. Majorities correctly identified all seven programs that were in fact entitlements according to the Bipartisan Commission on Entitlement and Tax Reform. About three-fourths of respondents named Social Security, veterans’ benefits, and Medicare as entitlements, and two-thirds listed Medicaid and unemployment compensation. Majorities also characterized federally subsidized loans for college students and food stamps as entitlements. However, majorities also incorrectly identified Head Start and tax deductions for mortgage payments as entitlements, and a plurality considered welfare under the new welfare reform law to be an entitlement. Only one in four knew that Head Start and welfare under the new reform law were not entitlements and one-third knew that tax deductions for mortgage payments were not. SOURCE: http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/reprint/16/5/111.pdf AUTHORS/CONTRIBUTORS: Bob Blendon is professor of health policy and political analysis at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government and the Harvard School of Public Health. John Benson is deputy director of the Harvard Program on Public Opinion and Health/Social Policy, Harvard School of Public Health. Mollyann Brodie is senior researcher and director of special projects, The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, in Menlo Park, California. Mario Brossard is assistant director of polling at The Washington Post. Drew Altman is president of the Kaiser Family Foundation. Richard Morin is director of polling at TheWashington Post. From my centrist conservative perspective, the liberals can roll up all government programs and label them as "Entitlements" if it makes them "feel better." However, 1) Veterans have benefits, 2) Entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are programs in which one is "supposed" to pay into, and 3) Those programs that others pay for - are Welfare. Now, I'm not opposed to Welfare as a gap measure using about 34 States form of a Performance-Based Model; but am opposed to it as a way of life; UNLESS, one is disabled and not a Veteran and then we have a moral, social and ethical responsibility to help them as much as possible (so long as said disability was not received as the result of criminal activity).Nobody has time to listen; because they're desperately chasing the need of being heard. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #20 October 26, 2010 QuoteNow, I'm not opposed to Welfare as a gap measure using about 34 States form of a Performance-Based Model; but am opposed to it as a way of life; UNLESS, one is disabled and not a Veteran and then we have a moral, social and ethical responsibility to help them as much as possible (so long as said disability was not received as the result of criminal activity). In a lot of circles, that would get you labeled a real pinko! At least join the ACLU. Here, I'll get you an application... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #21 October 26, 2010 i think you're wrong , but it seems like we'll never see eye to eye . no loss on my part. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BIGUN 1,488 #22 October 26, 2010 I've been called worse. Being a member of the ACLU is not exclusive to liberals.Nobody has time to listen; because they're desperately chasing the need of being heard. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites