hwt 0 #27 October 23, 2010 Here is the latest ad from Sharron Angle here in Nevada, this will make you feel better .. http://www.youtube.com/v/mJ36H9lkeRc?version=3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #28 October 25, 2010 Quote Here is the latest ad from Sharron Angle here in Nevada, this will make you feel better .. http://www.youtube.com/v/mJ36H9lkeRc?version=3 So what is untrue about that ad?Further on the original question . . . Even ABC questions if the comment was fair. Quote Chamber of Commerce director of media relations J.P. Fielder said that money goes to the group's general fund and then to the international division, keeping it away from any political activities. "No foreign money is used to fund our political activities," the Chamber said in a statement, citing the rules established by Congress more than a century ago. "We are seeing an attempt to demonize specific groups and distract Americans from a failed economic agenda," said the Chamber's vice president for government affairs Bruce Josten of the charges. "They have not one shred of evidence to back up that baseless lie," said Republican strategist Karl Rove of the claims. I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
funjumper101 15 #29 October 27, 2010 Quote Quote Here is the latest ad from Sharron Angle here in Nevada, this will make you feel better .. http://www.youtube.com/v/mJ36H9lkeRc?version=3 So what is untrue about that ad?Further on the original question . . . Even ABC questions if the comment was fair. Quote Chamber of Commerce director of media relations J.P. Fielder said that money goes to the group's general fund and then to the international division, keeping it away from any political activities. "No foreign money is used to fund our political activities," the Chamber said in a statement, citing the rules established by Congress more than a century ago. "We are seeing an attempt to demonize specific groups and distract Americans from a failed economic agenda," said the Chamber's vice president for government affairs Bruce Josten of the charges. "They have not one shred of evidence to back up that baseless lie," said Republican strategist Karl Rove of the claims. Did you know that the word "gullible" is not in the dictionary? What you posted is quite funny. The liars who have been caught are saying that they didn't really do what they did, even though the facts say otherwise. Their own financial statements are what one can use to establish a FACTUAL opinion. The statements show that the USCOC accepted international donations, deposited the funds in their general account, and used funds from the general account to pay for the advertisments in question. Transferring equivalents funds to other accounts is not accepted accounting practice for the type of organization the USCOC is. If a progressive or Democratic organization did such a thing, the howls of "MONEY LAUNDERING" from Faux news, Lush Rimjob, etc, would be deafening. It is amazing what you can get away with when the right wing media machine dislikes the truth. The USCOC is saying "Trust us. We have internal accounting procedures to launder the donations, so what actually happens is not what is shown in our own financial statements." Are RWCs really that gullible? Answer = YES!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #30 October 27, 2010 by overseas contributions you mean U.S. companies doing business overseas ? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #31 October 27, 2010 So, to sum up - When someone creates a political ad in which all the statements are literally correct, but gives sensitive people a misleading impression, it's wrong, evil and hurts America. When someone protests publicly, it's OK to smash her in the head. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #32 October 27, 2010 Quote So, to sum up - When someone creates a political ad in which all the statements are literally correct, but gives sensitive people a misleading impression, it's wrong, evil and hurts America. When someone protests publicly, it's OK to smash her in the head. I'm sorry you see it that way.maybe you should take some sensitivity courses.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
juanesky 0 #33 October 27, 2010 Quote He showed more integrity than he had before, that's for sure. Why am I not surprised this coming from you?. Lawyer lying under oath, in a deposition, for a sexual harrasment case. As quade would say...Classy. Integrity you can count on"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #34 October 27, 2010 Quote Quote He showed more integrity than he had before, that's for sure. Why am I not surprised this coming from you?. Lawyer lying under oath, in a deposition, for a sexual harrasment case. As quade would say...Classy.Integrity you can count on a new campaign sticker ? with some hopey changey thrown in ? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
