quade 4 #26 October 10, 2010 QuoteMy true selve is that I have no tolerance for your crap anymore... Feel free not to participate in any "crap" you don't want to. Nobody's holding a gun to your head. That said, if you do choose to participate, expect others will as well.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #27 October 10, 2010 Quote Quote My true selve is that I have no tolerance for your crap anymore... Feel free not to participate in any "crap" you don't want to. Nobody's holding a gun to your head. That said, if you do choose to participate, expect others will as well. There I go again.. steppin on a wittle fellas wast wittle nerve... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #28 October 10, 2010 QuoteQuoteMy true selve is that I have no tolerance for your crap anymore... Feel free not to participate in any "crap" you don't want to. Nobody's holding a gun to your head. That said, if you do choose to participate, expect others will as well. what in bloody hell are you talking about?Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #29 October 10, 2010 Quote Quote Quote My true selve is that I have no tolerance for your crap anymore... Feel free not to participate in any "crap" you don't want to. Nobody's holding a gun to your head. That said, if you do choose to participate, expect others will as well. There I go again.. steppin on a wittle fellas wast wittle nerve... I know...it's gets you off...quite sad actually.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #30 October 10, 2010 Quotewhat in bloody hell are you talking about? Feel free not to be here. Feel free not to participate in this forum. You won't have to "tolerate" anyone's "crap."quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #31 October 10, 2010 QuoteYou won't have to "tolerate" anyone's "crap." That doesn't mean to just shutup... If i see a peice of crap, I don't just let people step in it.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #32 October 10, 2010 QuoteQuoteYou won't have to "tolerate" anyone's "crap." That doesn't mean to just shutup... No. It means that she is as free to express her opinion in this forum and is just as valid in doing so as anyone else. If you are tired of having to "tolerate" it, there's an obvious solution available to you; don't participate in the forum. Just don't read it and you won't have to "tolerate" it.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #33 October 10, 2010 QuoteIf you are tired of having to "tolerate" it, there's an obvious solution available to you; don't participate in the forum. Just don't read it and you won't have to "tolerate" it. Wrong...again!Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #34 October 10, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote My true selve is that I have no tolerance for your crap anymore... Feel free not to participate in any "crap" you don't want to. Nobody's holding a gun to your head. That said, if you do choose to participate, expect others will as well. There I go again.. steppin on a wittle fellas wast wittle nerve... I know...it's gets you off...quite sad actually. OK ok...sorry.. since a depiction of Jesus getting fellated upsets you so... perhaps then you should stick to viewing just run of the mill catholic clergy being fellated, or maybe a bishop or cardinal thrown in for variety. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #35 October 10, 2010 Quoteperhaps then you should stick to viewing just run of the mill catholic clergy being fellated, or maybe a bishop or cardinal thrown in for variety. You indeed are a special case... When I first heard that, I never really did think it was meant as a positive thing....that is you being a special case. sigh...what happened to us sugar momma?Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #36 October 10, 2010 Quotehttp://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2010/10/09/woman-charged-for-destroying-controversial-jesus-art-in-colorado/?hpt=T2 What I think is particularly despicable is the Chirstians appear to have the news as spooked over this as it would over a piece showing Muhammad. Show the flippin' piece of art you douchbags. How the are we supposed to know whether it's "offensive" or not if we can't see it? What gives you the idea that they are "spooked"? The issue I have is who is the responsible party at the place that the vandalism took place. "displays at a city-owned museum" Why is the city allowing religious or anti religious art there at all?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #37 October 10, 2010 Quote Quote http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2010/10/09/woman-charged-for-destroying-controversial-jesus-art-in-colorado/?hpt=T2 What I think is particularly despicable is the Chirstians appear to have the news as spooked over this as it would over a piece showing Muhammad. Show the flippin' piece of art you douchbags. How the are we supposed to know whether it's "offensive" or not if we can't see it? What gives you the idea that they are "spooked"? The issue I have is who is the responsible party at the place that the vandalism took place. "displays at a city-owned museum" Why is the city allowing religious or anti religious art there at all? Yeah.. keep it in church where it belongs.... I am sure Jimmy Swagggart, Tony Alamo, and Ted Haggard would agree,,, and lets not forget all those priests that were getting some strange with the choir boys. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #38 October 10, 2010 QuoteWhat gives you the idea that they are "spooked"? Because the report (if you would have read and listened to it), specifically says they're not showing it so as to not upset more people. Quote The issue I have is who is the responsible party at the place that the vandalism took place. "displays at a city-owned museum" The Christian with the crowbar. Quote Why is the city allowing religious or anti religious art there at all? Because it's art. If you've never been in a museum, and it appears as if you haven't been, what they do is have this building with art in it. LOTS of cities have them. They have pictures of all sorts of things. Many historic piece of art have religious themes. Oh I know, where is that pesky division between church and state? IT'S A FREEKIN' ART MUSEUM! THAT'S WHAT THEY DO!quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites turtlespeed 226 #39 October 10, 2010 Quote Quote Quote http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2010/10/09/woman-charged-for-destroying-controversial-jesus-art-in-colorado/?hpt=T2 What I think is particularly despicable is the Chirstians appear to have the news as spooked over this as it would over a piece showing Muhammad. Show the flippin' piece of art you douchbags. How the are we supposed to know whether it's "offensive" or not if we can't see it? What gives you the idea that they are "spooked"? The issue I have is who is the responsible party at the place that the vandalism took place. "displays at a city-owned museum" Why is the city allowing religious or anti religious art there at all? Quote Yeah.. keep it in church where it belongs.... Absolutely Quote I am sure Jimmy Swagggart, Tony Alamo, and Ted Haggard would agree,,, and lets not forget all those priests that were getting some strange with the choir boys. This last statement is misplaced in this conversation. You saying that at this time and in this way makes it seem like you have some underlying personal issues for which you need to find an outlet for your anger.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Coreece 190 #40 October 10, 2010 Quote Yeah.. keep it in church where it belongs.... I am sure Jimmy Swagggart, Tony Alamo, and Ted Haggard would agree,,, and lets not forget all those priests that were getting some strange with the choir boys. ...and lets not forget biased bigotry and judging a whole group based on a few.you must verily enjoy your verbal diarrhea....like the laugh that is only heard from the fool telling the joke.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites sundevil777 102 #41 October 10, 2010 QuoteIT'S A FREEKIN' ART MUSEUM! THAT'S WHAT THEY DO! No, they display offensive art when they are in favor of offending those intended to be offended. There is a big difference.People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites turtlespeed 226 #42 October 10, 2010 Quote Quote What gives you the idea that they are "spooked"? Because the report (if you would have read and listened to it), specifically says they're not showing it so as to not upset more people. Quote *** The issue I have is who is the responsible party at the place that the vandalism took place. "displays at a city-owned museum" The Christian with the crowbar. Ah, I see that you consider the "The Christian with a crowbar" to be the owner/operator of the museum. If that is the case, then there should be no issue then. Did you miss the clarification I left in quotes regarding the city owning the museum, or were you just being dinenjenuous with your comprehension? Quote Why is the city allowing religious or anti religious art there at all? Because it's art. LOTS of cities have them. They have pictures of all sorts of things. Many historic piece of art have religious themes. Oh I know, where is that pesky division between church and state? IT'S A FREEKIN' ART MUSEUM! THAT'S WHAT THEY DO! How interesting it is regarding the timing and tolerance of the agreement/disagreement with that pesky little issue isn't it? Quote If you've never been in a museum, and it appears as if you haven't been, what they do is have this building with art in it. Trying to belittle someone doesn't really suit you any more. It might have in the past, maybe. Perhaps, for the last few years your holier than thou attitude was amusuing to yourself, but as time goes on, you are showing yourself to be even more petty with your apparent insatiable need to talk down to people. Shame really. All you are doing is losing respect for yor self.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #43 October 10, 2010 Quote Quote Yeah.. keep it in church where it belongs.... I am sure Jimmy Swagggart, Tony Alamo, and Ted Haggard would agree,,, and lets not forget all those priests that were getting some strange with the choir boys. ...and lets not forget biased bigotry and judging a whole group based on a few.you must verily enjoy your verbal diarrhea....like the laugh that is only heard from the fool telling the joke. It seems you might have a wee bit too much "faith"in organized religion...and those who profit greatly from it. These "holy men" have been abusing their religion for a very long time... butts thats ok... they can do as they wish right.. and all they need do is to ask for forgiveness. I think you will find its a bit more than your "few" and I just point it out... not judging them. I prefer to leave the judging to GOD... and I don't think its going to go so well for a whole lot of those who usurp gods authority. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Coreece 190 #44 October 10, 2010 QuoteQuoteIT'S A FREEKIN' ART MUSEUM! THAT'S WHAT THEY DO! No, they display offensive art when they are in favor of offending those intended to be offended. There is a big difference. whatever...they can display what they want... I just find it interesting how the bigots lash out at the group rather than the perp...biased bigotry, indeed. overall hypocritical at best.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #45 October 10, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteIT'S A FREEKIN' ART MUSEUM! THAT'S WHAT THEY DO! No, they display offensive art when they are in favor of offending those intended to be offended. There is a big difference. whatever...they can display what they want... I just find it interesting how the bigots lash out at the group rather than the perp...biased bigotry, indeed. overall hypocritical at best. Hmmm I see the persecution complex is alive and well. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites sundevil777 102 #46 October 10, 2010 The perp is getting prosecuted, right? Not much worthy of discussion there. I don't think the national endowment for the arts would be showing off a pic of Obama in a jar of urine, or Michael Moore with elephant poop on it. I wouldn't want taxpayer money funding that either.People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites turtlespeed 226 #47 October 10, 2010 QuoteThe perp is getting prosecuted, right? Not much worthy of discussion there. I don't think the national endowment for the arts would be showing off a pic of Obama in a jar of urine, or Michael Moore with elephant poop on it. I wouldn't want taxpayer money funding that either. Perhaps he could redo the picture to promote the same picture featuring Mohammad, just for equal time and all. Would that be OK to display at a city owned Museum?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Coreece 190 #48 October 10, 2010 Quote It seems you might have a wee bit too much "faith"in organized religion Than you don't know me at all...have you read anything I've posted other than my recent responses to your verbal flatulence? Quote These "holy men" have been abusing their religion for a very long time Ya, we know...You're not helping anything. Quote they can do as they wish right.. and all they need do is to ask for forgiveness. Wrong, they need to repent. Quote I think you will find its a bit more than your "few" and I just point it out Ok...do you have a precentage? Quote I prefer to leave the judging to GOD... So you believe in God? How...How has He revealed himself to you and through what means? Quote and I don't think its going to go so well for a whole lot of those who usurp gods authority. Indeed, there's (false teachers) is the hottest hell, the next is reserved for those who have heard and lived the Gospel only to reject it. (apostates) Anyone correct me if I'm wrong.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Coreece 190 #49 October 10, 2010 Quote Hmmm I see the persecution complex is alive and well. persecution? more like...pediatricksYour secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #50 October 10, 2010 Quote Quote Hmmm I see the persecution complex is alive and well. persecution? more like...pediatricks Basically bring up anything that some "christian" finds to their dislike... and they get all butthurt in a heartbeat.. and cry about how they are being persecuted. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 2 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
turtlespeed 226 #39 October 10, 2010 Quote Quote Quote http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2010/10/09/woman-charged-for-destroying-controversial-jesus-art-in-colorado/?hpt=T2 What I think is particularly despicable is the Chirstians appear to have the news as spooked over this as it would over a piece showing Muhammad. Show the flippin' piece of art you douchbags. How the are we supposed to know whether it's "offensive" or not if we can't see it? What gives you the idea that they are "spooked"? The issue I have is who is the responsible party at the place that the vandalism took place. "displays at a city-owned museum" Why is the city allowing religious or anti religious art there at all? Quote Yeah.. keep it in church where it belongs.... Absolutely Quote I am sure Jimmy Swagggart, Tony Alamo, and Ted Haggard would agree,,, and lets not forget all those priests that were getting some strange with the choir boys. This last statement is misplaced in this conversation. You saying that at this time and in this way makes it seem like you have some underlying personal issues for which you need to find an outlet for your anger.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #40 October 10, 2010 Quote Yeah.. keep it in church where it belongs.... I am sure Jimmy Swagggart, Tony Alamo, and Ted Haggard would agree,,, and lets not forget all those priests that were getting some strange with the choir boys. ...and lets not forget biased bigotry and judging a whole group based on a few.you must verily enjoy your verbal diarrhea....like the laugh that is only heard from the fool telling the joke.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sundevil777 102 #41 October 10, 2010 QuoteIT'S A FREEKIN' ART MUSEUM! THAT'S WHAT THEY DO! No, they display offensive art when they are in favor of offending those intended to be offended. There is a big difference.People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #42 October 10, 2010 Quote Quote What gives you the idea that they are "spooked"? Because the report (if you would have read and listened to it), specifically says they're not showing it so as to not upset more people. Quote *** The issue I have is who is the responsible party at the place that the vandalism took place. "displays at a city-owned museum" The Christian with the crowbar. Ah, I see that you consider the "The Christian with a crowbar" to be the owner/operator of the museum. If that is the case, then there should be no issue then. Did you miss the clarification I left in quotes regarding the city owning the museum, or were you just being dinenjenuous with your comprehension? Quote Why is the city allowing religious or anti religious art there at all? Because it's art. LOTS of cities have them. They have pictures of all sorts of things. Many historic piece of art have religious themes. Oh I know, where is that pesky division between church and state? IT'S A FREEKIN' ART MUSEUM! THAT'S WHAT THEY DO! How interesting it is regarding the timing and tolerance of the agreement/disagreement with that pesky little issue isn't it? Quote If you've never been in a museum, and it appears as if you haven't been, what they do is have this building with art in it. Trying to belittle someone doesn't really suit you any more. It might have in the past, maybe. Perhaps, for the last few years your holier than thou attitude was amusuing to yourself, but as time goes on, you are showing yourself to be even more petty with your apparent insatiable need to talk down to people. Shame really. All you are doing is losing respect for yor self.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #43 October 10, 2010 Quote Quote Yeah.. keep it in church where it belongs.... I am sure Jimmy Swagggart, Tony Alamo, and Ted Haggard would agree,,, and lets not forget all those priests that were getting some strange with the choir boys. ...and lets not forget biased bigotry and judging a whole group based on a few.you must verily enjoy your verbal diarrhea....like the laugh that is only heard from the fool telling the joke. It seems you might have a wee bit too much "faith"in organized religion...and those who profit greatly from it. These "holy men" have been abusing their religion for a very long time... butts thats ok... they can do as they wish right.. and all they need do is to ask for forgiveness. I think you will find its a bit more than your "few" and I just point it out... not judging them. I prefer to leave the judging to GOD... and I don't think its going to go so well for a whole lot of those who usurp gods authority. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #44 October 10, 2010 QuoteQuoteIT'S A FREEKIN' ART MUSEUM! THAT'S WHAT THEY DO! No, they display offensive art when they are in favor of offending those intended to be offended. There is a big difference. whatever...they can display what they want... I just find it interesting how the bigots lash out at the group rather than the perp...biased bigotry, indeed. overall hypocritical at best.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #45 October 10, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteIT'S A FREEKIN' ART MUSEUM! THAT'S WHAT THEY DO! No, they display offensive art when they are in favor of offending those intended to be offended. There is a big difference. whatever...they can display what they want... I just find it interesting how the bigots lash out at the group rather than the perp...biased bigotry, indeed. overall hypocritical at best. Hmmm I see the persecution complex is alive and well. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sundevil777 102 #46 October 10, 2010 The perp is getting prosecuted, right? Not much worthy of discussion there. I don't think the national endowment for the arts would be showing off a pic of Obama in a jar of urine, or Michael Moore with elephant poop on it. I wouldn't want taxpayer money funding that either.People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #47 October 10, 2010 QuoteThe perp is getting prosecuted, right? Not much worthy of discussion there. I don't think the national endowment for the arts would be showing off a pic of Obama in a jar of urine, or Michael Moore with elephant poop on it. I wouldn't want taxpayer money funding that either. Perhaps he could redo the picture to promote the same picture featuring Mohammad, just for equal time and all. Would that be OK to display at a city owned Museum?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #48 October 10, 2010 Quote It seems you might have a wee bit too much "faith"in organized religion Than you don't know me at all...have you read anything I've posted other than my recent responses to your verbal flatulence? Quote These "holy men" have been abusing their religion for a very long time Ya, we know...You're not helping anything. Quote they can do as they wish right.. and all they need do is to ask for forgiveness. Wrong, they need to repent. Quote I think you will find its a bit more than your "few" and I just point it out Ok...do you have a precentage? Quote I prefer to leave the judging to GOD... So you believe in God? How...How has He revealed himself to you and through what means? Quote and I don't think its going to go so well for a whole lot of those who usurp gods authority. Indeed, there's (false teachers) is the hottest hell, the next is reserved for those who have heard and lived the Gospel only to reject it. (apostates) Anyone correct me if I'm wrong.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #49 October 10, 2010 Quote Hmmm I see the persecution complex is alive and well. persecution? more like...pediatricksYour secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #50 October 10, 2010 Quote Quote Hmmm I see the persecution complex is alive and well. persecution? more like...pediatricks Basically bring up anything that some "christian" finds to their dislike... and they get all butthurt in a heartbeat.. and cry about how they are being persecuted. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
