0
Guest

SecDef Gates Says "Too Few Bear Burdens of War"

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

Quote

To paraphrase Reagan,



Seriously? That's your model?



Model? What do you mean?

I was paraphrasing him because I could not recall the direct quote, but he said that we don't get the best minds in government, we get the least-common denominator. The best are busy elsewhere, and have better things to do. I don't blame them, and I agree with the observation, not necessarily with the originator.

Here's another great quote: "You are far more likely to meet an IRS agent than you are to meet someone whom you voted for." Now tell me that's not truth.

mh
.



Gee I guess I am doing somethign right with my taxes... the only time I got to meet an IRS agent was when I sold off some stock options that were underwater, and they thought I owed on the value of the whole thing.. and not the losses that occured. After bringing in a whole stack of the paperwork for those 2 years... I ended up getting about $12000 more back than what my very conservative accountant had put down.

On the flip side.. I have met well over two dozen people who I have voted for. I have only worked on about 5 of their campaigns but its funny about how they seem to remember you.... AND their friends seem to know you as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>Here's another great quote: "You are far more likely to meet an IRS agent
>than you are to meet someone whom you voted for." Now tell me that's not
>truth.

Certainly not true for me.



Rather than respond to the assertion with meaningless individual histories, it seems like a pretty easy question to tackle.

How many people does the IRS contact in person for audit matters per year? Then ballpark how many constituents a Senator or Representive might meet in a year.

If the numbers aren't matched yet, then give a WAG on the local politicians. I have no doubt the statement will fall false at this point. But at the Congressional level, may hold up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

On the flip side.. I have met well over two dozen people who I have voted for. I have only worked on about 5 of their campaigns but its funny about how they seem to remember you.... AND their friends seem to know you as well.



On the flip-flip side, the IRS knows all of your friends. [:/]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

On the flip side.. I have met well over two dozen people who I have voted for. I have only worked on about 5 of their campaigns but its funny about how they seem to remember you.... AND their friends seem to know you as well.



On the flip-flip side, the IRS knows all of your friends. [:/]


Render unto Ceasar is sound advice that goes back a hell of a long way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>Here's another great quote: "You are far more likely to meet an IRS agent
>than you are to meet someone whom you voted for." Now tell me that's not
>truth.

Certainly not true for me.



He was probably thinking of small business owners and the self employed - the folks the IRS says are most likely to cheat on their taxes.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

>Here's another great quote: "You are far more likely to meet an IRS agent
>than you are to meet someone whom you voted for." Now tell me that's not
>truth.

Certainly not true for me.



Rather than respond to the assertion with meaningless individual histories, it seems like a pretty easy question to tackle.



Disagree - the quote starts "YOU are..." - clearly directed at the individual listener/reader.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

>Here's another great quote: "You are far more likely to meet an IRS agent
>than you are to meet someone whom you voted for." Now tell me that's not
>truth.

Certainly not true for me.



Rather than respond to the assertion with meaningless individual histories, it seems like a pretty easy question to tackle.



Disagree - the quote starts "YOU are..." - clearly directed at the individual listener/reader.



FAIL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

>Here's another great quote: "You are far more likely to meet an IRS agent
>than you are to meet someone whom you voted for." Now tell me that's not
>truth.

Certainly not true for me.



Rather than respond to the assertion with meaningless individual histories, it seems like a pretty easy question to tackle.


Disagree - the quote starts "YOU are..." - clearly directed at the individual listener/reader.


FAIL.


Universal You, maybe?:D:D
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

>Here's another great quote: "You are far more likely to meet an IRS agent
>than you are to meet someone whom you voted for." Now tell me that's not
>truth.

Certainly not true for me.



Rather than respond to the assertion with meaningless individual histories, it seems like a pretty easy question to tackle.


Disagree - the quote starts "YOU are..." - clearly directed at the individual listener/reader.


FAIL.


Universal You, maybe?:D:D


I doubt Kelp has polled the entire US population, or even a small subset thereof. An assertion was made without one shred of actual evidence to support it, and two counterexamples have already been provided,
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

>Here's another great quote: "You are far more likely to meet an IRS agent
>than you are to meet someone whom you voted for." Now tell me that's not
>truth.

Certainly not true for me.



Rather than respond to the assertion with meaningless individual histories, it seems like a pretty easy question to tackle.


Disagree - the quote starts "YOU are..." - clearly directed at the individual listener/reader.


FAIL.


Universal You, maybe?:D:D


I doubt Kelp has polled the entire US population, or even a small subset thereof. An assertion was made without one shred of actual evidence to support it, and two counterexamples have already been provided,


good thing such polling is besides the point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0