0
scruffy

Pledge with America

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

Had the current congress done nothing including the HC sham bill, we would be much better off already



You mean letting the banks, GM and Chrysler fail? YESThat's the true free market approach but I think we'd be MUCH worse off if we had done that. As for HC, it was the right idea but it was too compromised to be as effective as it could be. It's also pretty much embraced in "the pledge", it's just that the Republicans want to claim it as their own.

Quote


Just as FDR did, Obama is extending the current mess.



True, times like this recession and the depression are times when the government is allowed to spend like a drunken sailor. The problem was that we had already done that and there was nothing left.

Your last statement I agree with except for the nothing left part. Would not matter is the gov coffers had been full
Not the right thing to do anythime
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I agree with both of you, except for the "current administration killing the economy". The economy was almost dead ......



I expected this from a couple players, not you.



I didn't think that there was any debate that our economy was in the shitter when #44 was elected. It's now stabilized (somewhat) but barely growing. That's not "killing" it. People just disagree on how they want to grow it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Your last statement I agree with except for the nothing left part. Would not matter is the gov coffers had been full
Not the right thing to do anythime



The government has to intervene if it's going to protect the country from failure. A pure, free market approach means that a successful business will thrive. And if it has to sacrifice a country to do it then that's part of the game. They just change the letterhead to a different country. I'm not willing to be that pure of a capitalist, especially when my tax dollars involved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I didn't think that there was any debate that our economy was in the shitter when #44 was elected. It's now stabilized (somewhat) but barely growing. That's not "killing" it. People just disagree on how they want to grow it.



and others would argue that we just stepped on the accelerator even harder with current policy - regardless of the previous guys screw ups - i.e., this admin and congress is pretty much the previous one on steroids

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I didn't think that there was any debate that our economy was in the shitter when #44 was elected. It's now stabilized (somewhat) but barely growing. That's not "killing" it. People just disagree on how they want to grow it.



and others would argue that we just stepped on the accelerator even harder with current policy - regardless of the previous guys screw ups - i.e., this admin and congress is pretty much the previous one on steroids


Nitrous!:|
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


and others would argue that we just stepped on the accelerator even harder with current policy - regardless of the previous guys screw ups - i.e., this admin and congress is pretty much the previous one on steroids



That spending would have happened regardless of who was President. The deficit came out pretty much right on to what the OMB predicted before #44's inauguration. Ron Paul would have been saddled with it. Of course he probably would have tried to save some money by leaving our two wars as quickly as possible and he probably would not have made any deals with the pharmaceutical companies to pass legislation but I could be wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0