mnealtx 0
Recommended Posts
jclalor 12
QuoteQuoteSo just give me a straight answer, you believe Obama wants to deny medical care to children?
Where did I say that?
You said........
Ask Obama's health czar.
Quote
"Dr. Emanuel makes a clear choice: "When implemented, the complete lives system produces a priority curve on which individuals aged roughly 15 and 40 years get the most substantial chance, whereas the youngest and oldest people get changes that are attenuated"
What then were you suggesting?
jclalor 12
Anyways, you are in agreement with the insurance company's decision?
mnealtx 0
QuoteWhat then were you suggesting?
That it's going to happen under Obamacare, as well, and very possibly more often.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
jclalor 12
QuoteQuoteQuoteWhat then were you suggesting?
That it's going to happen under Obamacare, as well, and very possibly more often.
Oh, then you did say that Obama wants to deny medical care to children.
mnealtx 0
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteWhat then were you suggesting?
That it's going to happen under Obamacare, as well, and very possibly more often.
Oh, then you did say that Obama wants to deny medical care to children.
Wrong again...but don't let that stop you from leaping to conclusions *now*...
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
wmw999 2,603
News flash. The rationing of health care happens all the time. Based on money, parents' decisions, ER doctors' decisions, insurance company decisions, Medicare and Medicaid decisions, you name it, it happens.
It's going to continue to happen. Should money be the primary arbiter of medical care rationing? Should the government? Should insurance companies? Should charities?
Because it's going to be one of them. Most of us are lucky enough never to need to think about rationing of medical care; our needs aren't that complex or expensive.
Wendy P.
It's going to continue to happen. Should money be the primary arbiter of medical care rationing? Should the government? Should insurance companies? Should charities?
Because it's going to be one of them. Most of us are lucky enough never to need to think about rationing of medical care; our needs aren't that complex or expensive.
Wendy P.
There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteIt took you three posts to blame Obama? You're slipping, Mike.
And the original post blamed it on conservatives - you liberals are still the champions.
Can you please show where I placed blame on the right?
"A five year old boy has died after an insurance company death panel refused to provide him with the treatment his Doctors recommended.
Where is the outrage from the right?"
Inference.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
1981 to 1988 is 7 years-Kallend (oops, it's actually 8 years Kallend)
The decade of the 80's was from 1980 to 1989. 10 years. If you remove 1980 and 1989 you have 1981 to 1988. 8 years.
QuoteQuote
Where is the outrage from the right?"
Inference.
Actually, it seems that the inference is hypocrisy, not blame.
QuoteNews flash. The rationing of health care happens all the time. Based on money, parents' decisions, ER doctors' decisions, insurance company decisions, Medicare and Medicaid decisions, you name it, it happens.
It's going to continue to happen. Should money be the primary arbiter of medical care rationing? Should the government? Should insurance companies? Should charities?
Because it's going to be one of them. Most of us are lucky enough never to need to think about rationing of medical care; our needs aren't that complex or expensive.
Wendy P.
Who might that be??
Few days ago, *Sicko* by M. Moore was in TV. As per his own definition, the movie was based on facts. If that's true, it really is a confession of failure in the oh so poor US.
And @ Mike:
That was before Obamas HC, sorry
dudeist skydiver # 3105
wmw999 2,603
I am with Michael Moore on a lot of beliefs. But he cherry-picks his data. His movies are based on facts just as much as the ones about Obama-birth-ism, and the 911-truthers' are.QuoteFew days ago, *Sicko* by M. Moore was in TV. As per his own definition, the movie was based on facts.
They all have facts included.
It's neither as bad as Moore makes out (for most people -- for some it is), nor as good as the anti-HC folks make out.
Wendy P.
There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)
QuoteNews flash. The rationing of health care happens all the time. Based on money, parents' decisions, ER doctors' decisions, insurance company decisions, Medicare and Medicaid decisions, you name it, it happens.
It's going to continue to happen. Should money be the primary arbiter of medical care rationing? Should the government? Should insurance companies? Should charities?
Because it's going to be one of them. Most of us are lucky enough never to need to think about rationing of medical care; our needs aren't that complex or expensive.
Wendy P.
Thank you, Wendy!
My wife is hotter than your wife.
Where did I say that?
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites