Skyrad 0 #26 September 6, 2010 Quote Islam: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0Qu6eyyr4c&feature=related Thats just lame, come on you can do better than that This would have been a much better video for you to put up... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LaAvZp7EP4&feature=related Of course the main difference between what you put up and what I put up initially is that my posting was actually from Jesus camp, yours however was simply a criminal attack carried out by a a few terrorists and doesn't represent Islam at all. As for the Hamas video, even that is not really a great analogy as Hamas is a nationalist movement first and formost that uses religion for its aims. However, where both the Hamas video and the Jesus Camp video match is that they are both examples of religious extremists poluting children with religious hatred in the name of God. Both are as disgusting to me. What is your view of child indoctrination into religious hatred? Actually having just seen the other videos you put up its quite clear where you stand on incitment to religious hatred. The ugly face of evangelisim revealed, how sad.When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skyrad 0 #27 September 6, 2010 Quote Quote Same reason to believe Christ, I suppose - a man who was the reason for the Crusades and the Inquisition. If that's all you can see, I suppose it wouldn't make much sense to believe what he says. You simply do not comprehend what's going on here...I thought U were smarer than that...*edited to change mispellings that would indicate that i'm stupid.* Content is as important for that as spelling.When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ianmdrennan 2 #28 September 6, 2010 QuoteI find it interesting that the focus is on atheism, when the real issue is an organization that by its inaction and actions essentially supports pedophilia. No one should be exempt from prosecution Agreed. Although I wouldn't go as far as to say it "supports" pedophilia. I don't believe that to be accurate. However, it knowingly covers it up or tries to hide it to 'save face'. Which is just as unacceptable.Performance Designs Factory Team Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ianmdrennan 2 #29 September 6, 2010 For those interested, and with netflix (available on streaming), I highly recommend this: Deliver Us From EvilPerformance Designs Factory Team Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
beowulf 1 #30 September 6, 2010 QuoteQuoteI find it interesting that the focus is on atheism, when the real issue is an organization that by its inaction and actions essentially supports pedophilia. No one should be exempt from prosecution Agreed. Although I wouldn't go as far as to say it "supports" pedophilia. I don't believe that to be accurate. However, it knowingly covers it up or tries to hide it to 'save face'. Which is just as unacceptable. Yeah, I agree that's why added the word essentially. I don't think they directly support pedophilia but they certainly are making it easier for their priests to get a way with it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #31 September 6, 2010 QuoteQuoteI find it interesting that the focus is on atheism, when the real issue is an organization that by its inaction and actions essentially supports pedophilia. No one should be exempt from prosecution Agreed. Although I wouldn't go as far as to say it "supports" pedophilia. I don't believe that to be accurate. However, it knowingly covers it up or tries to hide it to 'save face'. Which is just as unacceptable. I'd argue that it actually has crossed the line into "support". Cover-up of one, or a few, cases is one thing. But eventually the analysis is driven by sheer massive volume: a decades-long practice - conspiracy, frankly - of systematically not just shielding, but actively enabling hundreds of abusers of thousands of victims - by silencing and intimidating the victims and their families; by transferring abusers into other venues where they were not only away from their accusers but free to abuse more helpless victims; by actively thwarting police and prosecutors; by instructing their lawyers to invoke statutes-of-limitations defenses to shield them from lawsuits once the victims were old enough to have the guts to speak out; by disingenuous and arrogant media campaigns, etc., etc. It may be hard to find a certain historical "bright line" that delineates when the Church's cover-up morphed into active "support", but wherever it is, it has long since been crossed. It's not the liberal Catholics that should be speaking up the loudest at this. It is the most devout and conservative Catholics who should be among the most outraged by this abuse of and taking for granted-of their trust, and should be at the vanguard of those demanding to take their church back from its corrupt leadership. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remibond 0 #32 September 7, 2010 An interesting idea but unfortunately that's all it will ever be, arresting the pope in the U.K is far more likely to harm the country than help it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #33 September 7, 2010 a priest a pedophile and a child molester walk into a bar , and that was just the first guy ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pirana 0 #34 September 7, 2010 Quote >Why believe mohamad, a son of a man destined to live in hostility? Same reason to believe Christ, I suppose - a man who was the reason for the Crusades and the Inquisition. If that's all you can see, I suppose it wouldn't make much sense to believe what he says. >Why do you defend these fools? Are you replying to yourself here? She did reply to her own post, accusing herself of knowing absolutely nothing, or to be more precise: "you aparrently know absolutley nothing." Come on, that's funny." . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skyrad 0 #35 September 7, 2010 Quotea priest a pedophile and a child molester walk into a bar , and that was just the first guy ! Have you read the forum rules?When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #36 September 7, 2010 QuoteThats just lame It's all lame...that was the point i was trying to make. QuoteWhat is your view of child indoctrination into religious hatred? It sickens me. Very disturbing.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
