0
lawrocket

Another Nutter with a Gun and Explosive Device

Recommended Posts

This guy is different, though. He took hostages at the Discovery channel. Here is his manifesto:

http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/0901_demands.pdf

He wasn't driven on by Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck. Indeed, he was a nutter who was inspired by Daniel Quinn's novel "Ishmael" and Al Gore's film, "An Inconvenient Truth."

Here's my thing - I'm not going to blame the environmental movement or any persons involved with it for the outlier nut who happened to come upon environmentalism as the best ideology to support his misanthrope and nutty thoughts.

However, I would hope that those who ascribe the violence performed by those with right-leaning persons either agree that Al Gore is responsible for this, or retract their prior statements.

p.s. when a guy is wearing a bomb, I don't think that the guns are a big thing, either.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's good that all the innocents got out of there unharmed. It's also a terrible shame that they had to go through that.

That being said, it's too bad this guy didn't survive. I'd like to hear what he would have come up with next! Oh, and I didn't hear what was in the package he was carrying. What did he think he was going to do if his "demands" weren't met?

It seems that he didn't have enough money to provide shelter for himself, but he had enough to throw around bills two years ago at the same location; enough to pay his shelter buddies $100/day to demonstrate at Discovery. He also had enough motivation to maintain a web page about his viewpoint. Yeah, there's a productive member of society.
See the upside, and always wear your parachute! -- Christopher Titus

Shut Up & Jump!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

However, I would hope that those who ascribe the violence performed by those with right-leaning persons either agree that Al Gore is responsible for this, or retract their prior statements.



Eh?
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I quite like this chap... Or at least his view points on stopping the populating of the vile parasitic human species.

Maybe I'm just united in misanthrope.

To add: He is an idiot for being inspired by Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth though. I support his ideals but mostly on a non-global warming/conservation level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

This guy is different, though. He took hostages at the Discovery channel. Here is his manifesto:

http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/0901_demands.pdf

He wasn't driven on by Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck. Indeed, he was a nutter who was inspired by Daniel Quinn's novel "Ishmael" and Al Gore's film, "An Inconvenient Truth."

Here's my thing - I'm not going to blame the environmental movement or any persons involved with it for the outlier nut who happened to come upon environmentalism as the best ideology to support his misanthrope and nutty thoughts.

However, I would hope that those who ascribe the violence performed by those with right-leaning persons either agree that Al Gore is responsible for this, or retract their prior statements.

p.s. when a guy is wearing a bomb, I don't think that the guns are a big thing, either.



I guess the differenc is that there is a frenzy attitude around RW nuts. Abortion doctor killers really have the nod from many Christians. When LW nutters go off, they often destroy property, as with PETA, RW nutters tend to kill people and are more likley to have the backing, even if secretive, of RW/fundies.

Inc ase you haven't noticed, conservatism has 1 and only 1 template, liberalism is more diverse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

However, I would hope that those who ascribe the violence performed by those with right-leaning persons either agree that Al Gore is responsible for this, or retract their prior statements.



Eh?



He's trying the old, "they do it, we do it; it's all the same." This is how RWers blame the left for fiscal messes too. Generally the extremists come from the right, since that is the extreme and volatile position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[Reply]I guess the differenc is that there is a frenzy attitude around RW nuts.



one that you see. I myself see no difference between a right wing nut and a left wing nut. They are both nuts.

[Reply]When LW nutters go off, they often destroy property, as with PETA


Often. They do like killing people, too. After all, people are the cause of all the troubles in the world, and worth less than, say, a grain of salt.

[Reply]RW nutters tend to kill people and are more likley to have the backing, even if secretive, of RW/fundies



I disagree. nuts are nuts, dude. Right or left, a nut is a nut. And a lefty nut is just as likely to kill as a righty.

[Reply]Inc ase you haven't noticed, conservatism has 1 and only 1 template, liberalism is more diverse.



Correct. For exanple, only conservatives stereotype, right? [Laugh]

It's why you will call me a Republican - because my viewpoints are not fully in agreement with yours. There's plenty of room for diversity of views on the left, so long as those views are consistent with left-wing ideology.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0