skipbelt 0 #51 September 4, 2010 for those who believe , no evidence is necessary for those who don't evidence is unnecessary !attribution to follow ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #52 September 4, 2010 Quotefor those who believe , no evidence is necessary for those who don't evidence is unnecessary ! attribution to follow ! "The truth will withstand any scrutiny." Winsor Naugler III, 1962 Anything that requires belief is most assuredly false. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stayhigh 2 #53 September 4, 2010 Old testament is there as a proof to how bullshit it is. The fucking guy creates the whole thing in a week?? And some old guy who lived over 100 years can build ship big enough to hold all land creature without eating each other???? And how about ancestor of this guy?? Lived til 600,700, even 900 years. Abd whole testemnt is almost racist as fuck and discrimnates against mentaly challenged or hadicapped people. Go read leviticuts and DeuteronmyBernie Sanders for President 2016 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stayhigh 2 #54 September 4, 2010 However i firmly believe that when moses recieve the 10 commandemnt he was high on thc. Talking burning tree on top of mt.siani.??? The whole forest of kush trees on mt.sinai must caught on fire by thunder.Bernie Sanders for President 2016 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nigel99 616 #55 September 4, 2010 Quote Quote By the way the Bible does foretell of a 7 year period when this very scenario takes place. The Bible or just John (if it was indeed the same John) having a bad acid trip? That's the thing I've never understood about Revelations. Jesus never said it. Why is that even part of it? Jeez I didn't think revelations was in the old testamentAnyway the purpose of the OT was to tell us that women are size queens (Ezekial 23:20)Experienced jumper - someone who has made mistakes more often than I have and lived. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maadmax 0 #56 September 4, 2010 ---Disagree. There is NO evidence to support the Olivet discourse is even talking about a future occurrence let alone the one talked about in Revelations. ---The two simply can not be reconciled. They describe wildly different events. ---http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olivet_discourse Nice summary in Wikipedia. Interpretation is yours to choose from what ever makes the most sense. I have put in a lot of time studying this area, as it appears so have you. We have come to different conclusions. --I am curious of your background.Stay thirsty my friend. On this I whole heartedly agree... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #57 September 6, 2010 i believe you have a D license ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites