Scrambled Brains

[Amazon 7]

Dissecting the Scrambled Brains of the GOP

by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

It was not so long ago that GOP Senators Chuck Hegal and Richard Lugar described the Bush administration as "incompetent"! And they were being polite. CONSERVATIVE commentator George Will referred to the Bush administration as "...the gang that couldn't shoot straight!" In Iraq, Bush's "puppet" Allawi said of WMD: "...they must be somewhere!"


WMD are where you find them! But that's not to say that WMD were ever in Iraq! It does not follow that because something is not 'here', it must be 'there'! It does not follow that because something is 'not' then something else 'is'.

The Bush regime was as utterly incompetent as it was evil. Otherwise, Dick Cheney, who supervised 911, would have just ordered his minions to 'plant' WMD in the areas his 'task force' had already targeted for theft! In retrospect, the Bush regime turns out to have been half-assed crooks, half-assed murderers, half-assed liars, a ludicrous gang that couldn't shoot straight.

It might have been Kant who said that there is a moral imperative to be intelligent. By that standard, the GOP grows more evil as it grows more stupid!


The cure that kills!

The GOP under Bush was determined to stay the course if it killed us. It killed many of us --those 'left behind' by Texas' 'dead last' educational system and millions more for whom murdering Iraqis and stealing oil was, perhaps, their career path of last resort!

It was Ronald Reagan who put a smiley face on "psychosis", i.e. the indulgence of delusion as long as it makes you feel good or, at least, better about yourself. Reagan did this for millions who returned his utterly failed administration to office. Thus, the GOP perfected the 'big lie' with research and focus groups. There was simply no way to get a GOPPER elected on fact or reason. Insanity became and remains the campaign strategy of choice for a party that could not, cannot think straight, a party that is either delusional or is dishonest and just pretends to be insane as a cover!

Wealth would trickle down, Dr Feelgood (Ronald Reagan) assured us, if we would but help him make the privileged elite even richer. Wealth didn't trickle down and never has ...but millions swooned as the aging actor made them feel better about themselves [GOP Convention, 1992, Houston]. The effect was as short-lived as are many 'feel good' remedies and sex toys. Come to think of it --every GOP administration is a circle jerk of old cronies, limited intelligences and the morally bankrupt.

'Let them eat cake and live in houses'


Ronald Reagan told us that those made homeless and forced to live in tent cities were "mentally ill". It was the middle class that had been made homeless during those Reagan nightmare years and while Carter occupied the White House, they had lived in houses. I suppose that as long as they were in a house, they were considered by the GOP to be sane. If you don't have a house, the GOP thinks you are nuts!

Official government statistics [Bureau of Labor Statistics, BEA, Census Bureau] prove that job creation and GDP were higher during the Carter years than in any GOP regime since WWII. As they would say in Texas: the GOP 'cain't carry Carter's shit!' Carter is --therefore --a GOP whipping boy not because he failed but because he succeeded.

Job Growth Per Year Under Most Recent Presidents
Johnson 3.8%
Carter 3.1
Clinton 2.4
Kennedy 2.3
Nixon 2.3
Reagan 2.1
Bush 0.6
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics Survey
It must be pointed out that under Clinton, the recently insane went sane again and moved back into houses! The GOP never figured it out! I was surprised when the GOP failed to lambast the Democrats for the dramatic drop in tent sales during the Clinton years.

GOP thought processes are scrambled. GOP logic works backward from conclusions to premises. The late Barbara Olson said that Gary Condit was guilty of murder not because there was evidence against him but because there was none.

Similarly, it was during the 2000 election debacle that Robert Novak said Democrats were 'trying to steal this election by counting votes!' Antonin Scalia would not be outdone. He said that continuing the recount would be harmful to Bush! Indeed! Bush would have lost!

Scalia did not know when to shut the flock up, adding:
Count first, and rule upon legality afterwards, is not a recipe for producing election results that have the public acceptance democratic stability requires.

--Antonin Scalia, U. S. Supreme Court Justice
'Scuse me!

Anyone getting the fewer number of votes is supposed to lose. Scalia was just puking up something that sounded 'scholarly' but, in fact, meant: stop the count while Bush is still ahead!!

Bush v Gore majority opinions are pure bunkum, lousy law, worse legal scholarship. The BEST critique of Bush v Gore is found in the dissenting opinions, primarily Ruth Bader Ginsberg who laid bare Scalia's idiocy and hypocrisy.
I might join THE CHIEF JUSTICE were it my commission to interpret Florida law. But disagreement with the Florida court's interpretation of its own State' s law does not warrant the conclusion that the justices of that court have legislated. There is no cause here to believe that the dissenting members of Florida' s high court have done less than ''their mortal best to discharge their oath of office,'' Sumner v. Mata, 449 U. S. 539, 549 (1981), and no cause to upset their reasoned interpretation of Florida law.

JUSTICE GINSBURG, with whom JUSTICE STEVENS joins, and with whom JUSTICE SOUTER and JUSTICE BREYER join as to Part I, dissenting. [emphasis mine, EC]

GOP brains should be dissected, studied, diagnosed and then quarantined! Scalia's condition should be written up by someone like Carl Jung who estimated that as much as thirty percent of any population is certifiably psychopathic and/or delusional. The GOP, meanwhile, consulted swamis or anyone who could justify ex post facto the conclusions already drawn, the results desired but not really ever achieved.

Scalia displays psychopathic symptoms which Dr. Gustav Gilbert identified among the Nazi war criminals he studied at Nuremberg.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia recently claimed that the Constitution does not prohibit the execution of an innocent man provided that he has had a fair trial. While this is astonishing enough coming from a man who holds himself out as a Catholic -- even more astonishing is how Justice Scalia substitutes his personal religious beliefs for the law and the Constitution.

This extraordinary tale of what we might call substitutionalism, begins with the case of Troy Davis who was sentenced to death by the State of Georgia in 1991 for the murder of a police officer. Davis has always maintained his innocence and sought a new new trial. "Seven key witnesses have since recanted," according to an editorial in The New York Times, "and several people have charged that the main prosecution witness was the shooter. Rather than arguing that there were procedural flaws in his trial, Mr. Davis is making the more basic claim that he is innocent and that new evidence proves it."

U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens declared "the substantial risk of putting an innocent man to death clearly provides an adequate justification." The majority of his colleagues agreed and ordered a federal judge in Georgia to review the new evidence and rule whether it "clearly establishes" Davis' innocence.

But Scalia and fellow traditionalist Catholic, Clarence Thomas, didn't see it that way. "This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial," Scalia opined, " but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent."

--How Do You Solve a Problem Like Scalia?


Again --Scalia, typical of his ilk, thinks 'backward'. Certainly, a 'fair trial', however desirable, is not an ideal but, like 'justice' itself, a means by which the taking of an innocent life by the state is made less likely. The state murder of a provable innocent because all the 't's' are crossed and all the 'i's' dotted is not just Kafakaesque, it typifies the endemic evil of the state itself.

A paper will be written about the many lies that the GOP has told about Social Security. Unless they are stopped, the GOP will one day raid Social Security not because it's broke but because it's not! If SS were broke, the GOP would have nothing to covet, no booty to be divided up among their base of Wall St insiders! When they have seized SS, the GOP will argue that they had to kill it to save it! Social Security 'reform' will consist of transferring more wealth to the wealthy, putting those monies into the hands of the Wall St geniuses who brought you every recession/depression since the Great Depression of 1929 and its more recent reprise under Bushco.


Against Kerry, Bush and the GOP resorted to almost every lie and every GOP fallacy. Millions apparently believed Bush when he told them that because HE failed in Iraq, we should NOT elect Kerry! Perhaps the GOP believed that because the GOP left us record budget shortfalls, deficits, and the world's largest NEGATIVE current account balance, we should never elect Democrats who left instead the more nearly balanced budgets and, often, surpluses! Big Brother must be pleased to learn that all of his 'big lies' have been put to work by the US GOP.

Are we safe yet?


Millions believed Bush when he said that we were certain to get hit by terrorists again and, seemingly in the same paragraph, we were safer! It never occurred to the media to ask: which is it? Are we safer or not?

Obviously --the GOP strategists never figured this one out: did the GOP get more votes by saying we were safer or were more votes gained by saying we were less safe? The GOP consultants and focus group gurus let them down. They never resolved the issue! With any luck, the GOP's central processor will overheat and melt down before the party destroys the US as we knew it!

[quade 4]

Quote

--How Do You Solve a Problem Like Scalia?

I'm guessing this is a joke lost on most.

quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Quote

--How Do You Solve a Problem Like Scalia?

I'm guessing this is a joke lost on most.

[NewGuy2005 53]

Quote

Quote

--How Do You Solve a Problem Like Scalia?

I'm guessing this is a joke lost on most.

The Sound of Music.

Next.

[skycop 0]

........yawn............
I could find something that would equally slam the dems, but I won't waste my time.

While the fringes of both sides throw stones, the common sense middle is going to take this country back.

It's easy to bitch, but it's much harder to find solutions.

See ya in November.

"Just 'cause I'm simple, don't mean I'm stewpid!"

[turtlespeed 226]

Quote

........yawn............
I could find something that would equally slam the dems, but I won't waste my time.

While the fringes of both sides throw stones, the common sense middle is going to take this country back.

It's easy to bitch, but it's much harder to find solutions.

See ya in November.

You mean you will see thgeir asses, as their heads will be firmly planted in them or the sand.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[skyrider 0]

How long have you hadd this fear of free thinking Americans? People that don't want thier lives controled by covernment!

You really shoudl see soemoen abotu these unrationable fears, they seem to obcess you day and night, to the point where it is all you can talk about!

On the upsode, with wall the time you wast e posting slam stories, rather than getting out of that chair and loosing a few tons actually "working" for your party , the better chance we havee in November!

Have you heard of that concept? "WORKING FOR your people to help" instead of "WORKING AGAINST the other group"?

My guess is not!

All you post are slams, never anything showing the so called good, that you must think has been done....

[Amazon 7]

Quote

How long have you hadd this fear of free thinking Americans? People that don't want thier lives controled by covernment!

You really shoudl see soemoen abotu these unrationable fears, they seem to obcess you day and night, to the point where it is all you can talk about!

On the upsode, with wall the time you wast e posting slam stories, rather than getting out of that chair and loosing a few tons actually "working" for your party , the better chance we havee in November!

Have you heard of that concept? "WORKING FOR your people to help" instead of "WORKING AGAINST the other group"?

My guess is not!

All you post are slams, never anything showing the so called good, that you must think has been done....

Could you try that again, this time in English????

[turtlespeed 226]

Oh, come on, even you could figure that post out.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[christelsabine 1]

Quote

Oh, come on, even you could figure that post out.

Oh, am I on the wrong site? Are we playing crossword games? Quizzes?

It really is a shame someone's blowing out such an erroneous post in his own language on an international site.

dudeist skydiver # 3105

[turtlespeed 226]

Quote

Quote

Oh, come on, even you could figure that post out.

Oh, am I on the wrong site? Are we playing crossword games? Quizzes?

It really is a shame someone's blowing out such an erroneous post in his own language on an international site.

It's even more of a shame, really, that people are so petty, as to make it the focus of the issue as opposed to the context. I can see why, though, when you have no valid argument or rebuttle, please feel freet oattack grammar and spelling.

Or maybe, it is just that he cares more about the issues than he does about proof reading his typing.

It could just be that he just doesn't think you are worth putting forth the effort to try to please.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Oh, come on, even you could figure that post out.

Oh, am I on the wrong site? Are we playing crossword games? Quizzes?

It really is a shame someone's blowing out such an erroneous post in his own language on an international site.

It's even more of a shame, really, that people are so petty, as to make it the focus of the issue as opposed to the context. I can see why, though, when you have no valid argument or rebuttle, please feel freet oattack grammar and spelling.

Or maybe, it is just that he cares more about the issues than he does about proof reading his typing.

It could just be that he just doesn't think you are worth putting forth the effort to try to please.

Again prease in engrish

[turtlespeed 226]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Oh, come on, even you could figure that post out.

Oh, am I on the wrong site? Are we playing crossword games? Quizzes?

It really is a shame someone's blowing out such an erroneous post in his own language on an international site.

It's even more of a shame, really, that people are so petty, as to make it the focus of the issue as opposed to the context. I can see why, though, when you have no valid argument or rebuttle, please feel freet oattack grammar and spelling.

Or maybe, it is just that he cares more about the issues than he does about proof reading his typing.

It could just be that he just doesn't think you are worth putting forth the effort to try to please.

Again prease in engrish

Thank you for reiterating my point.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[christelsabine 1]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Oh, come on, even you could figure that post out.

Oh, am I on the wrong site? Are we playing crossword games? Quizzes?

It really is a shame someone's blowing out such an erroneous post in his own language on an international site.

It's even more of a shame, really, that people are so petty, as to make it the focus of the issue as opposed to the context. I can see why, though, when you have no valid argument or rebuttle, please feel freet oattack grammar and spelling.

Or maybe, it is just that he cares more about the issues than he does about proof reading his typing.

It could just be that he just doesn't think you are worth putting forth the effort to try to please.

Focus of what? I only see one thing in a focus: Horrible bad written post which, just on first glance, is not more than rubbish. If in my job I'd receive such a sloppy letter, it surely would end in the shredder.

If there's a *focus or any sense* in it or not. I would not take my time to find out. Embarrassing.

How to transfer *an issue* to anyone with such a "text"?? How to take the poster/his post seriously??

*Maybe*, *It could be ..* - cop-outs.

Awkward.

dudeist skydiver # 3105

[turtlespeed 226]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Oh, come on, even you could figure that post out.

Oh, am I on the wrong site? Are we playing crossword games? Quizzes?

It really is a shame someone's blowing out such an erroneous post in his own language on an international site.

It's even more of a shame, really, that people are so petty, as to make it the focus of the issue as opposed to the context. I can see why, though, when you have no valid argument or rebuttle, please feel freet oattack grammar and spelling.

Or maybe, it is just that he cares more about the issues than he does about proof reading his typing.

It could just be that he just doesn't think you are worth putting forth the effort to try to please.

Focus of what? I only see one thing in a focus: Horrible bad written post which, just on first glance, is not more than rubbish. If in my job I'd receive such a sloppy letter, it surely would end in the shredder.

If there's a *focus or any sense* in it or not. I would not take my time to find out. Embarrassing.

How to transfer *an issue* to anyone with such a "text"?? How to take the poster/his post seriously??

*Maybe*, *It could be ..* - cop-outs.

Awkward.

You DO yealise that this is a forom and not a business or educational platform, right?

Hmmm, what happened to tolerance?

I guess that is only applicable for the non-self-righteous superior beings.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Hmmm, what happened to tolerance?

I guess that is only applicable for the non-self-righteous superior beings.

Actually, we do an amazing job daily by tolerating the lesser forms of life that are so demonstrably intolerant of all others not like themselves. I guess we have an abundance of hope that someday those lesser forms will evolve into beings capable of actually being like they profess to be while deluding themselves that they are following things as taught from their holy book.

[champu 1]

There aren't any revolutionary new ideas spawning from speakers corner on dropzone.com. For the most part people just repackage already popular (or unpopular) opinions and then a predictable dance on the edge of insult ensues. The same really goes for political pundits, blogs, youtube videos, etc. as well.

Occasionally the dips and twirls are entertaining.

But if everyone understands that's what's going on, consciously or otherwise, then a poor job to even perform the simple repackaging will draw ridicule. If you go to ask someone to dance and stutter and throw up on their shoes they're not going to dance with you.

[turtlespeed 226]

Quote

There aren't any revolutionary new ideas spawning from speakers corner on dropzone.com. For the most part people just repackage already popular (or unpopular) opinions and then a predictable dance on the edge of insult ensues. The same really goes for political pundits, blogs, youtube videos, etc. as well.

Occasionally the dips and twirls are entertaining.

But if everyone understands that's what's going on, consciously or otherwise, then a poor job to even perform the simple repackaging will draw ridicule. If you go to ask someone to dance and stutter and throw up on their shoes they're not going to dance with you.

When was the last time you met Bolas?

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[christelsabine 1]

Quote

....
You DO yealise that this is a forom and not a business or educational platform, right?

Sure, I do. You know, an internet forum shows wonderful chances like *talking* to aliens from coast to coast. If such a *talking* isn't doable due to poor form of expression, it's no more fun and just leaves a bad impression of the other side.

Quote

Hmmm, what happened to tolerance?

I guess that is only applicable for the non-self-righteous superior beings.

Tolerance? On what? Accepting bad skills? No.

Think what you like. I never would spurn my own mother language. Especially not in the presence of foreigners.

dudeist skydiver # 3105

[turtlespeed 226]

Quote

Quote

....
You DO yealise that this is a forom and not a business or educational platform, right?

Sure, I do. You know, an internet forum shows wonderful chances like *talking* to aliens from coast to coast. If such a *talking* isn't doable due to poor form of expression, it's no more fun and just leaves a bad impression of the other side.

Quote

Hmmm, what happened to tolerance?

I guess that is only applicable for the non-self-righteous superior beings.

Tolerance? On what? Accepting bad skills? No.

Think what you like. I never would spurn my own mother language. Especially not in the presence of foreigners.

I wouldn't intentionally either, but it happens.
Sometimes I take the time to proof read, and sometimes I don't.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Quote

Quote

....
You DO yealise that this is a forom and not a business or educational platform, right?

Sure, I do. You know, an internet forum shows wonderful chances like *talking* to aliens from coast to coast. If such a *talking* isn't doable due to poor form of expression, it's no more fun and just leaves a bad impression of the other side.

Quote

Hmmm, what happened to tolerance?

I guess that is only applicable for the non-self-righteous superior beings.

Tolerance? On what? Accepting bad skills? No.

Think what you like. I never would spurn my own mother language. Especially not in the presence of foreigners.

I wouldn't intentionally either, but it happens.
Sometimes I take the time to proof read, and sometimes I don't.

I think you hit the nail on the head right there. Many posters it seems have been suckin on at least 80 proof.. others back east.... I think it is closer to 180 proof

[turtlespeed 226]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

....
You DO yealise that this is a forom and not a business or educational platform, right?

Sure, I do. You know, an internet forum shows wonderful chances like *talking* to aliens from coast to coast. If such a *talking* isn't doable due to poor form of expression, it's no more fun and just leaves a bad impression of the other side.

Quote

Hmmm, what happened to tolerance?

I guess that is only applicable for the non-self-righteous superior beings.

Tolerance? On what? Accepting bad skills? No.

Think what you like. I never would spurn my own mother language. Especially not in the presence of foreigners.

I wouldn't intentionally either, but it happens.
Sometimes I take the time to proof read, and sometimes I don't.

I think you hit the nail on the head right there. Many posters it seems have been suckin on at least 80 proof.. others back east.... I think it is closer to 180 proof

What part of the East are you in?

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[Amazon 7]

Quote

What part of the East are you in?

You are not very good with geography are you Clint.

I am a few miles from Puget Sound, a fiord formed by glaciers on the western edge of North America.

Unlike some of the posters here that I have met at boogies, I have chosen not to kill brain cells on a daily basis with substance abuse.

[turtlespeed 226]

Quote

Quote

What part of the East are you in?

You are not very good with geography are you Clint.

I am a few miles from Puget Sound, a fiord formed by glaciers on the western edge of North America.

Unlike some of the posters here that I have met at boogies, I have chosen not to kill brain cells on a daily basis with substance abuse.

Well then you should stop chastising posters for not proof reading posts, when, in fact, you meant "in the WEST".

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[kelpdiver 2]

I think the main irony in this initial quoted column is that seems like a perfect illustration of scrambled brains: rambling, poor transitions from topic to topic, and how seriously did you take it after reading how Chaney supervised 9/11?