Amazon 7 #1 August 26, 2010 Just move along.... nothing to see here...IF YOU ARE FUCKING BLIND Blackwater Fraud All Results1-10 of 462,000 results [url "http://www.bing.com/search?q=KBR+fraud&go=&form=QBRE&qs=n&sk=&sc=1-9" ">KBR fraud All Results1-10 of 144,000 results DynCorp fraud All Results1-10 of 56,400 results And the Beat goes on and on and on leading to Bush ties to Blackwater All Results1-10 of 327,000 results Do we REALLLLLY need the Cheney ties to Haliburton???? Yup sure.. you betcha "> Cheney ties to HaliburtonAll Results1-10 of 335,000 results·Advanced Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #2 August 26, 2010 QuoteJust move along.... nothing to see here...IF YOU ARE FUCKING BLIND Blackwater Fraud All Results1-10 of 462,000 results [url "http://www.bing.com/search?q=KBR+fraud&go=&form=QBRE&qs=n&sk=&sc=1-9" ">KBR fraud All Results1-10 of 144,000 results DynCorp fraud All Results1-10 of 56,400 results And the Beat goes on and on and on leading to Bush ties to Blackwater All Results1-10 of 327,000 results Do we REALLLLLY need the Cheney ties to Haliburton???? Yup sure.. you betcha "> Cheney ties to HaliburtonAll Results1-10 of 335,000 results·Advanced quoting numbers from search results is hardly damning. Some of what's listed inside some of the results would make for interesting discussion. It's a shame you didn't dig a little deeper. However I could post google results for "amazon is goat fuck stupid" but that doesn't mean it's true.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #3 August 26, 2010 I would be so banned if I did something similar......................... Nice try at a PA though. AS far as the articles.... according to the faithfull defender of THE BUSH... it did not happen... I was making a point... since some of you get off on little semantics games Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #4 August 26, 2010 Back in the day we had the oil scandal tied to Harding and he went down as nearly the worst pres of all time, now we have Cheney tied to Halliburton and we expect it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #5 August 26, 2010 QuoteQuoteJust move along.... nothing to see here...IF YOU ARE FUCKING BLIND Blackwater Fraud All Results1-10 of 462,000 results [url "http://www.bing.com/search?q=KBR+fraud&go=&form=QBRE&qs=n&sk=&sc=1-9" ">KBR fraud All Results1-10 of 144,000 results DynCorp fraud All Results1-10 of 56,400 results And the Beat goes on and on and on leading to Bush ties to Blackwater All Results1-10 of 327,000 results Do we REALLLLLY need the Cheney ties to Haliburton???? Yup sure.. you betcha "> Cheney ties to HaliburtonAll Results1-10 of 335,000 results·Advanced quoting numbers from search results is hardly damning. Some of what's listed inside some of the results would make for interesting discussion. It's a shame you didn't dig a little deeper. However I could post google results for "amazon is goat fuck stupid" but that doesn't mean it's true. Or we could search Alexander Haig and come up with many hits. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zep 0 #6 August 26, 2010 Strange if you google "democratic party fraud" it gives 12.8 million hits where as if you google "republican party fraud" it only gives 5 million hits People in glass houses,........ I think you know the rest. Gone fishing Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #7 August 26, 2010 QuoteBack in the day we had the oil scandal tied to Harding and he went down as nearly the worst pres of all time, now we have Cheney tied to Halliburton and we expect it. And don't forget your own personal savior, Bill Clinton, who committed sexual harrassment while Governor and President, lied about it to a grand jury ( a felony), and a bunch of goat-fuck-stupid people said it was ok.HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgoose71 0 #8 August 26, 2010 Ya, I guess if my party was in the headlines quite a bit for corruption charges right now I would start a smear campaign to try to drag my opponents into the dumpster with me also. As the election draws closer, I would expect to see a lot more of this. Blame Bush, blame Bush, blame Bush, blame Bush, blame Bush. Kinda rolls off the tongue with a little practice, does it not? "There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." Life, the Universe, and Everything Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #9 August 26, 2010 Quote I would be so banned if I did something similar......................... Nice try at a PA though. AS far as the articles.... according to the faithfull defender of THE BUSH... it did not happen... I was making a point... since some of you get off on little semantics games you could search for rhaig is goat fuck stupid and come up with many hits also. The presence of something on the internet doesn't make it true. The more prevalent presence of something on the internet doesn't make it more true or less false. It only indicates how many people are posting about it.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #10 August 26, 2010 QuoteQuoteBack in the day we had the oil scandal tied to Harding and he went down as nearly the worst pres of all time, now we have Cheney tied to Halliburton and we expect it. And don't forget your own personal savior, Bill Clinton, who committed sexual harrassment while Governor and President, lied about it to a grand jury ( a felony), and a bunch of goat-fuck-stupid people said it was ok. Yea, basicaly the entire world thought it was pathetic to persecute the guy for that. I guess you're saying the you selectively agree with the process. If a guy you want gets convicted, it's a good system; if a guy you want covicted get acquitted, it's a non-functionin g system. Amazing how he left and holds > a 50% approval, whereas your favorite president is probably < 30% and never was impeached. See, silly neo-cons focus on silly issues; the rest of us focus on substantive issues like the economy, social need, etc. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #11 August 26, 2010 Quote Quote I would be so banned if I did something similar......................... Nice try at a PA though. AS far as the articles.... according to the faithfull defender of THE BUSH... it did not happen... I was making a point... since some of you get off on little semantics games you could search for rhaig is goat fuck stupid and come up with many hits also. The presence of something on the internet doesn't make it true. The more prevalent presence of something on the internet doesn't make it more true or less false. It only indicates how many people are posting about it. True, but all that aside, the garbage groups she posted are corrupt. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Butters 0 #12 August 26, 2010 Quote Quote However I could post google results for "amazon is goat fuck stupid" but that doesn't mean it's true. amazon is goat fuck stupid All Results 1-10 of 89,300 results Using the number of search results to prove something is ... "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #13 August 26, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteBack in the day we had the oil scandal tied to Harding and he went down as nearly the worst pres of all time, now we have Cheney tied to Halliburton and we expect it. And don't forget your own personal savior, Bill Clinton, who committed sexual harrassment while Governor and President, lied about it to a grand jury ( a felony), and a bunch of goat-fuck-stupid people said it was ok. Yea, basicaly the entire world thought it was pathetic to persecute the guy for that. I guess you're saying the you selectively agree with the process. If a guy you want gets convicted, it's a good system; if a guy you want covicted get acquitted, it's a non-functionin g system. Amazing how he left and holds > a 50% approval, whereas your favorite president is probably < 30% and never was impeached. See, silly neo-cons focus on silly issues; the rest of us focus on substantive issues like the economy, social need, etc. No, the world did not think it was pathetic, only the goat-fuck-stupids did. Sexual harrassment is no joking matter, Bubba, and neither is perjury. He WAS found guilty (it is called IMPEACHMENT) by the House of Representatives but was not punished by the Senate. Please advise as to who you think my favorite President was. And, for the last time, I am not a neo-con and consider it a personal insult.HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyrider 0 #14 August 27, 2010 Obama Fraud 3,920,000 results Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,133 #15 August 27, 2010 >He WAS found guilty (it is called IMPEACHMENT) by the House of >Representatives but was not punished by the Senate. Actually, no. The equivalent in the civil world would be that he was indicted but found not guilty by a court of law. Would you consider a person found not guilty by a court of law guilty or innocent of the crimes they were charged with? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #16 August 27, 2010 Quote Obama Fraud 3,920,000 results I will see your 3,920,000 and raise you The SAME SOURCE I used before( funny how you tried to run a scam and GOT CAUGHT) OBAMA FRAUD All Results1-10 of 181,000 results·Advanced BUSH FRAUD All Results1-10 of 12,800,000 results WOW based on THOSE numbers.. I bet even MIKEE might find something that would shake his worship of THE GREAT BUSH NAHHHHHH never happen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #17 August 27, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteBack in the day we had the oil scandal tied to Harding and he went down as nearly the worst pres of all time, now we have Cheney tied to Halliburton and we expect it. And don't forget your own personal savior, Bill Clinton, who committed sexual harrassment while Governor and President, lied about it to a grand jury ( a felony), and a bunch of goat-fuck-stupid people said it was ok. Yea, basicaly the entire world thought it was pathetic to persecute the guy for that. I guess you're saying the you selectively agree with the process. If a guy you want gets convicted, it's a good system; if a guy you want covicted get acquitted, it's a non-functionin g system. Amazing how he left and holds > a 50% approval, whereas your favorite president is probably < 30% and never was impeached. See, silly neo-cons focus on silly issues; the rest of us focus on substantive issues like the economy, social need, etc. QuoteNo, the world did not think it was pathetic, only the goat-fuck-stupids did. Sexual harrassment is no joking matter, Bubba, and neither is perjury. Many European countries thought it was pathetic of RW garbage to persecute him for that, then the head tool to the impeachment, Newt Gingrich, was discovered fucking around on his wife. QuoteHe WAS found guilty (it is called IMPEACHMENT) by the House of Representatives but was not punished by the Senate. Oh, is that how sad your political understanding is? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment Impeachment is a formal process in which an official is accused of unlawful activity and the outcome of which, depending on country can lead to the removal of that official from office or other punishment. They even place the operative word in italics. It is an accusation, not a finding of guilt. Now, what was that you were saying about, "only the goat-fuck-stupids did." An impeachment is a political indictment, it makes possible the trial process; it's only a way to bring it to trial, not a conviction. It's tantamount to a probable cause hearing. QuotePlease advise as to who you think my favorite President was. Oh, anyone maggotted and who wants to deprive poor and MC people of benefits and make the even more rich. If you had the courage, you would tell me. QuoteAnd, for the last time, I am not a neo-con and consider it a personal insult. I don't blame you, I wouldn't like that title either, but denial is a bad thing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Lucky... 0 #18 August 27, 2010 QuoteObama Fraud 3,920,000 results All by tea baggers Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Lucky... 0 #19 August 27, 2010 Quote>He WAS found guilty (it is called IMPEACHMENT) by the House of >Representatives but was not punished by the Senate. Actually, no. The equivalent in the civil world would be that he was indicted but found not guilty by a court of law. Would you consider a person found not guilty by a court of law guilty or innocent of the crimes they were charged with? And I replied before I read this. Amazing how people call others, "goat fuck stupid" when they can't grasp simple concepts like that of political impeachment. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #20 August 27, 2010 Most of them I saw.. were the imbeciles aspiring to be MORONs AKA Birthers Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Belgian_Draft 0 #21 August 27, 2010 Quote>He WAS found guilty (it is called IMPEACHMENT) by the House of >Representatives but was not punished by the Senate. Actually, no. The equivalent in the civil world would be that he was indicted but found not guilty by a court of law. Would you consider a person found not guilty by a court of law guilty or innocent of the crimes they were charged with? Yes, you are correct. But that does not alter the fact that the majority of the Sanate believed he was guilty but voted 'not guilty' because the Constitution only allows for the removal of the impeached and they felt his crimes were not of a serious enough nature to remove him from office. I happen to disagree. Allowing a President to get away with perjury and sexual harrassment only sets the stage for future Presidents breaking the law and expecting to get away with it, ex. GWB. A person found not guilty by a court of law is to be just that...not guilty. They are found neither guilty nor innocent.HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #22 August 27, 2010 Quote Quote Obama Fraud 3,920,000 results I will see your 3,920,000 and raise you The SAME SOURCE I used before( funny how you tried to run a scam and GOT CAUGHT) So, your search engine is the only valid one? Quote BUSH FRAUD All Results1-10 of 12,800,000 results WOW based on THOSE numbers.. I bet even MIKEE might find something that would shake his worship of THE GREAT BUSH Better get to reading - you might even find that proof you keep saying exists somewhere in there. Quote NAHHHHHH never happen Probably not - you haven't seemed to find any proof yet, after how many years talking about it?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Lucky... 0 #23 August 27, 2010 Quote Quote >He WAS found guilty (it is called IMPEACHMENT) by the House of >Representatives but was not punished by the Senate. Actually, no. The equivalent in the civil world would be that he was indicted but found not guilty by a court of law. Would you consider a person found not guilty by a court of law guilty or innocent of the crimes they were charged with? Quote Yes, you are correct. But that does not alter the fact that the majority of the Sanate believed he was guilty but voted 'not guilty' because the Constitution only allows for the removal of the impeached and they felt his crimes were not of a serious enough nature to remove him from office. He WAS found guilty (it is called IMPEACHMENT) by the House of Representatives but was not punished by the Senate. So, yes you are correct an impeachment is a political indictment, but he was found guilty by the House . Are you like the Fonz; can you not admit you're wrong? You said the House found him guilty and that the Senate decided not to punish him. The truth is that the House found the charges sufficient to bring to trial, he was acquitted at trial. And hell, they needed 2/3 and couldn't even crap out a simple majority on either charge. Even if the maggots had solidarity they couldn't have made 67, so quit and quit looking more and more silly. And the Senate refused to punish him? Who said they chaged their vote to avoid punishment? Not that it matters, as they couldn't make 67 anyway. Perhaps the truth is that all Dems and some R's thought Newt and his misguided agenda were so pathetic that they wouldn't fascillitate it. And then family values Newt of course fucked around on his wife but that's OK to Belgian, as he didn't lie about it. It must be fun to be in your mind. Quote I happen to disagree. Allowing a President to get away with perjury and sexual harrassment only sets the stage for future Presidents breaking the law and expecting to get away with it, ex. GWB. A person found not guilty by a court of law is to be just that...not guilty. They are found neither guilty nor innocent. But Clinton was found not guilty in a political court, so you are contradicting yourself, unless you count your dellusion that 27 and 32 senators changed their vote from guilty to not guilty. Are you claiming Dems changed their votes too? I love to read your love for the system until you dislike the outcome, then it's flawed. BTW, how do you feel about Libby, a person very close to the pres, for obstruction and perjury convicted in a CRIMINAL COURT WITH MUCH HIGHER CRIMINAL STANDARDS, then commuted after a 30 month sentence? Oh yea, we won;t talk about that one. Or we could cite Stenibrenner's felony pardoning. Of course we would have to indict your neo-con heroes, so that won't happen. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites skyrider 0 #24 August 27, 2010 Quote Quote Obama Fraud 3,920,000 results I will see your 3,920,000 and raise you The SAME SOURCE I used before( funny how you tried to run a scam and GOT CAUGHT) OBAMA FRAUD All Results1-10 of 181,000 results·Advanced BUSH FRAUD All Results1-10 of 12,800,000 results WOW based on THOSE numbers.. I bet even MIKEE might find something that would shake his worship of THE GREAT BUSH NAHHHHHH never happen I ran a scam? sounds like a false accusation to me, and a blantant personal attack...whats Up Mods, I have been warned for much less?Here is the "Link" seems there have already been sevral hundred thousand more hits added! 7, 900,000 plus http://search.aol.com/aol/search?query=obama+Fraud&s_it=client95_searchbox Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #25 August 27, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Obama Fraud 3,920,000 results I will see your 3,920,000 and raise you The SAME SOURCE I used before( funny how you tried to run a scam and GOT CAUGHT) OBAMA FRAUD All Results1-10 of 181,000 results·Advanced BUSH FRAUD All Results1-10 of 12,800,000 results WOW based on THOSE numbers.. I bet even MIKEE might find something that would shake his worship of THE GREAT BUSH NAHHHHHH never happen I ran a scam? sounds like a false accusation to me, and a blantant personal attack...whats Up Mods, I have been warned for much less?Here is the "Link" seems there have already been sevral hundred thousand more hits added! 7, 900,000 plus http://search.aol.com/aol/search?query=obama+Fraud&s_it=client95_searchbox You're in more dire need of cheese than any white man in history! How many of your "hits" are from the whack jobs who STILL believe Obama is not an American?????? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 Next Page 1 of 3 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
Lucky... 0 #18 August 27, 2010 QuoteObama Fraud 3,920,000 results All by tea baggers Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #19 August 27, 2010 Quote>He WAS found guilty (it is called IMPEACHMENT) by the House of >Representatives but was not punished by the Senate. Actually, no. The equivalent in the civil world would be that he was indicted but found not guilty by a court of law. Would you consider a person found not guilty by a court of law guilty or innocent of the crimes they were charged with? And I replied before I read this. Amazing how people call others, "goat fuck stupid" when they can't grasp simple concepts like that of political impeachment. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #20 August 27, 2010 Most of them I saw.. were the imbeciles aspiring to be MORONs AKA Birthers Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #21 August 27, 2010 Quote>He WAS found guilty (it is called IMPEACHMENT) by the House of >Representatives but was not punished by the Senate. Actually, no. The equivalent in the civil world would be that he was indicted but found not guilty by a court of law. Would you consider a person found not guilty by a court of law guilty or innocent of the crimes they were charged with? Yes, you are correct. But that does not alter the fact that the majority of the Sanate believed he was guilty but voted 'not guilty' because the Constitution only allows for the removal of the impeached and they felt his crimes were not of a serious enough nature to remove him from office. I happen to disagree. Allowing a President to get away with perjury and sexual harrassment only sets the stage for future Presidents breaking the law and expecting to get away with it, ex. GWB. A person found not guilty by a court of law is to be just that...not guilty. They are found neither guilty nor innocent.HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #22 August 27, 2010 Quote Quote Obama Fraud 3,920,000 results I will see your 3,920,000 and raise you The SAME SOURCE I used before( funny how you tried to run a scam and GOT CAUGHT) So, your search engine is the only valid one? Quote BUSH FRAUD All Results1-10 of 12,800,000 results WOW based on THOSE numbers.. I bet even MIKEE might find something that would shake his worship of THE GREAT BUSH Better get to reading - you might even find that proof you keep saying exists somewhere in there. Quote NAHHHHHH never happen Probably not - you haven't seemed to find any proof yet, after how many years talking about it?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #23 August 27, 2010 Quote Quote >He WAS found guilty (it is called IMPEACHMENT) by the House of >Representatives but was not punished by the Senate. Actually, no. The equivalent in the civil world would be that he was indicted but found not guilty by a court of law. Would you consider a person found not guilty by a court of law guilty or innocent of the crimes they were charged with? Quote Yes, you are correct. But that does not alter the fact that the majority of the Sanate believed he was guilty but voted 'not guilty' because the Constitution only allows for the removal of the impeached and they felt his crimes were not of a serious enough nature to remove him from office. He WAS found guilty (it is called IMPEACHMENT) by the House of Representatives but was not punished by the Senate. So, yes you are correct an impeachment is a political indictment, but he was found guilty by the House . Are you like the Fonz; can you not admit you're wrong? You said the House found him guilty and that the Senate decided not to punish him. The truth is that the House found the charges sufficient to bring to trial, he was acquitted at trial. And hell, they needed 2/3 and couldn't even crap out a simple majority on either charge. Even if the maggots had solidarity they couldn't have made 67, so quit and quit looking more and more silly. And the Senate refused to punish him? Who said they chaged their vote to avoid punishment? Not that it matters, as they couldn't make 67 anyway. Perhaps the truth is that all Dems and some R's thought Newt and his misguided agenda were so pathetic that they wouldn't fascillitate it. And then family values Newt of course fucked around on his wife but that's OK to Belgian, as he didn't lie about it. It must be fun to be in your mind. Quote I happen to disagree. Allowing a President to get away with perjury and sexual harrassment only sets the stage for future Presidents breaking the law and expecting to get away with it, ex. GWB. A person found not guilty by a court of law is to be just that...not guilty. They are found neither guilty nor innocent. But Clinton was found not guilty in a political court, so you are contradicting yourself, unless you count your dellusion that 27 and 32 senators changed their vote from guilty to not guilty. Are you claiming Dems changed their votes too? I love to read your love for the system until you dislike the outcome, then it's flawed. BTW, how do you feel about Libby, a person very close to the pres, for obstruction and perjury convicted in a CRIMINAL COURT WITH MUCH HIGHER CRIMINAL STANDARDS, then commuted after a 30 month sentence? Oh yea, we won;t talk about that one. Or we could cite Stenibrenner's felony pardoning. Of course we would have to indict your neo-con heroes, so that won't happen. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyrider 0 #24 August 27, 2010 Quote Quote Obama Fraud 3,920,000 results I will see your 3,920,000 and raise you The SAME SOURCE I used before( funny how you tried to run a scam and GOT CAUGHT) OBAMA FRAUD All Results1-10 of 181,000 results·Advanced BUSH FRAUD All Results1-10 of 12,800,000 results WOW based on THOSE numbers.. I bet even MIKEE might find something that would shake his worship of THE GREAT BUSH NAHHHHHH never happen I ran a scam? sounds like a false accusation to me, and a blantant personal attack...whats Up Mods, I have been warned for much less?Here is the "Link" seems there have already been sevral hundred thousand more hits added! 7, 900,000 plus http://search.aol.com/aol/search?query=obama+Fraud&s_it=client95_searchbox Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #25 August 27, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Obama Fraud 3,920,000 results I will see your 3,920,000 and raise you The SAME SOURCE I used before( funny how you tried to run a scam and GOT CAUGHT) OBAMA FRAUD All Results1-10 of 181,000 results·Advanced BUSH FRAUD All Results1-10 of 12,800,000 results WOW based on THOSE numbers.. I bet even MIKEE might find something that would shake his worship of THE GREAT BUSH NAHHHHHH never happen I ran a scam? sounds like a false accusation to me, and a blantant personal attack...whats Up Mods, I have been warned for much less?Here is the "Link" seems there have already been sevral hundred thousand more hits added! 7, 900,000 plus http://search.aol.com/aol/search?query=obama+Fraud&s_it=client95_searchbox You're in more dire need of cheese than any white man in history! How many of your "hits" are from the whack jobs who STILL believe Obama is not an American?????? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
