0
Amazon

Welfare

Recommended Posts

Do any of you people realize WHERE the welfare truly going.. and who is benefiting???

OMG... look who is on the DOLE

GO FUCKING FIGURE



Anti-socialist Bachmann got $250K in federal farm subsidies -

On Congress: Anti-socialist Bachmann got $250K in federal farm subsidiesDecember 22, 2009
Categories:House Republicans.Anti-socialist Bachmann got $250K in federal farm subsidies
Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) — so fond of accusing the Obama administration of foisting socialism on an unwilling America — has apparently been the recipient of about a quarter of million bucks in government handouts.

Liberal site Truthdig links to an Environmental Working Group analysis of federal agricultural subsidies and found that the Bachmann family farm, managed by her father-in-law until his recent death, received $251,000 in farm payments between 1995 and 2006.

Bachmann’s financial disclosure forms indicate her stake in the Wisconsin farm is worth up to $250,000. Her income from the farm has grown from $2,000 a year a few years back to as much as $50,000 for 2008.

Truthdig calls her a "Welfare Queen":

Bachmann's family farm received $251,973 in federal subsidies between 1995 and 2006. The farm had been managed by Bachmann's recently deceased father-in-law and took in roughly $20,000 in 2006 and $28,000 in 2005, with the bulk of the subsidies going to dairy and corn. Both dairy and corn are heavily subsidized — or "socialized" — businesses in America (in 2005 alone, Washington spent $4.8 billion propping up corn prices) and are subject to strict government price controls.

Bachmann isn't alone in her selective socialism: EWG found that the top four districts receiving the largest ag payments are represented by conservative Republicans.

1. 3rd district of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith - Republican) - $1,736,923,011 in subsidies go to 51,702 recipients.

2. 1st district of Kansas (Rep. Jerry Moran - Republican) - $1,315,979,151 in subsidies go to 75,802 recipients.

3. 4th district of Iowa (Rep. Tom Latham - Republican) - $1,288,622,912 in subsidies go to 35,696 recipients.

4. 9th district of Texas (Rep. Randy Neugebauer - Republican) - $1,227,192,312 in subsidies go to 21,290 recipients.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Do any of you people realize WHERE the welfare truly going.. and who is benefiting???

OMG... look who is on the DOLE

GO FUCKING FIGURE



Anti-socialist Bachmann got $250K in federal farm subsidies -

On Congress: Anti-socialist Bachmann got $250K in federal farm subsidiesDecember 22, 2009
Categories:House Republicans.Anti-socialist Bachmann got $250K in federal farm subsidies
Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) — so fond of accusing the Obama administration of foisting socialism on an unwilling America — has apparently been the recipient of about a quarter of million bucks in government handouts.

Liberal site Truthdig links to an Environmental Working Group analysis of federal agricultural subsidies and found that the Bachmann family farm, managed by her father-in-law until his recent death, received $251,000 in farm payments between 1995 and 2006.

Bachmann’s financial disclosure forms indicate her stake in the Wisconsin farm is worth up to $250,000. Her income from the farm has grown from $2,000 a year a few years back to as much as $50,000 for 2008.

Truthdig calls her a "Welfare Queen":

Bachmann's family farm received $251,973 in federal subsidies between 1995 and 2006. The farm had been managed by Bachmann's recently deceased father-in-law and took in roughly $20,000 in 2006 and $28,000 in 2005, with the bulk of the subsidies going to dairy and corn. Both dairy and corn are heavily subsidized — or "socialized" — businesses in America (in 2005 alone, Washington spent $4.8 billion propping up corn prices) and are subject to strict government price controls.

Bachmann isn't alone in her selective socialism: EWG found that the top four districts receiving the largest ag payments are represented by conservative Republicans.

1. 3rd district of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith - Republican) - $1,736,923,011 in subsidies go to 51,702 recipients.

2. 1st district of Kansas (Rep. Jerry Moran - Republican) - $1,315,979,151 in subsidies go to 75,802 recipients.

3. 4th district of Iowa (Rep. Tom Latham - Republican) - $1,288,622,912 in subsidies go to 35,696 recipients.

4. 9th district of Texas (Rep. Randy Neugebauer - Republican) - $1,227,192,312 in subsidies go to 21,290 recipients.



Awesome - Thank you for reitterating my point.

Now, if you please . . . Get RID of welfare for all those that are not diabled.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PSSSST.. what COLOR on the political map are those again?

WHERE is all that righteous indignation:S:S

Edited to add the RED COUNTY America map...

OH my look at all the RED counties.. getting all those billions in socialist government payouts in FLYOVER HYPOCRISY welfare land

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

PSSSST.. what COLOR on the political map are those again?

WHERE is all that righteous indignation:S:S



You mentioned that I was against what the FF wanted in regards to the country. I put forth that your statement applied more to you than me.

Welfare was never one of their wants.
National Heathcare was never one of their wants.

You voted in favor of both of those.

I prove my point.

Next.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

PSSSST.. what COLOR on the political map are those again?

WHERE is all that righteous indignation:S:S



You mentioned that I was against what the FF wanted in regards to the country. I put forth that your statement applied more to you than me.

Welfare was never one of their wants.
National Heathcare was never one of their wants.

You voted in favor of both of those.

I prove my point.

Next.


OH MY FUCKING GAWD.....

The country CHANGED in the last 200+ years.... like the TAX CODE


BUT.. I am sure a lot of good ole boys would be quite happy to go back to the America of the Founding Fathers... wouldnt you:S:S:S:S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

PSSSST.. what COLOR on the political map are those again?

WHERE is all that righteous indignation:S:S



You mentioned that I was against what the FF wanted in regards to the country. I put forth that your statement applied more to you than me.

Welfare was never one of their wants.
National Heathcare was never one of their wants.

You voted in favor of both of those.

I prove my point.

Next.


OH MY FUCKING GAWD.....

The country CHANGED in the last 200+ years.... like the TAX CODE


BUT.. I am sure a lot of good ole boys would be quite happy to go back to the America of the Founding Fathers... wouldnt you:S:S:S:S


In some ways, yes, in others yes.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0