jclalor 12 #1 August 24, 2010 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100823/ap_on_sc/us_judge_stem_cell Once again science being impeded by superstition. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #2 August 24, 2010 Quotehttp://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100823/ap_on_sc/us_judge_stem_cell Once again science being impeded by superstition. WASHINGTON – A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked government rules expanding stem cell research, a blow to the Obama administration that could stall potentially lifesaving research. Hell, a blow to mant conservatives like Mrs Reagan. Only the nuttiest variety are for this judge's ruling. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyrider 0 #3 August 24, 2010 Quote Quote http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100823/ap_on_sc/us_judge_stem_cell Once again science being impeded by superstition. WASHINGTON – A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked government rules expanding stem cell research, a blow to the Obama administration that could stall potentially lifesaving research. Hell, a blow to mant conservatives like Mrs Reagan. Only the nuttiest variety are for this judge's ruling. Why is it eveyr time the Obama administration fucks up, rather than own it, the libs point out a Republican that was a fuck up too?Two wrongs make a right?as for the OP, that is fucked up......Very fucked up....no telling how many lives that judge will cost! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 35 #4 August 24, 2010 Dumb stupid ignorant fuckhead excuse for a judge. "Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #5 August 24, 2010 Quote Quote Quote http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100823/ap_on_sc/us_judge_stem_cell Once again science being impeded by superstition. WASHINGTON – A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked government rules expanding stem cell research, a blow to the Obama administration that could stall potentially lifesaving research. Hell, a blow to mant conservatives like Mrs Reagan. Only the nuttiest variety are for this judge's ruling. Why is it eveyr time the Obama administration fucks up, rather than own it, the libs point out a Republican that was a fuck up too?Two wrongs make a right?as for the OP, that is fucked up......Very fucked up....no telling how many lives that judge will cost! Einstein, you should get a clue and actually read the article: The Obama administration expanded the number of stem cell lines created with private money that federally funded scientists could research, up from the 21 that President George W. Bush had allowed to 75 so far. Just because it's a blow to the Obama Admin, that doesn't mean it's his doing or his fault. Federal law explicitly forbids use of taxpayer dollars to destroy a human embryo — and culling stem cells from an embryo does destroy the embryo. However, once created, these batches of stem cells, or lines, can reproduce indefinitely in lab dishes. And who passed/signed that law? Your hero, your twin, GWB. Rememebr the start of the 8 illustrious years, he went on TV and blathered out how this was a good idea to cut gov funding for stem cell research? Again, fucking read and research and then understand what you're talking about. A maggot appointed by a maggot: what a surprise - he is from Texas: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royce_C._Lamberth He was nominated to the federal bench on March 19, 1987 by President Ronald Reagan, and confirmed by the United States Senate on November 13, 1987[url] Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 3 #6 August 24, 2010 The judge followed the letter of a reprehensible law; nothing more or less. He even tried once to avoid having to rule on it, by (earlier) dismissing the case on the grounds that the plaintiffs did not have standing to sue, but the Court of Appeals overruled him on that and sent the case back to him for a ruling. And now, instead of bashing the Congressional majority that wrote and passed the bill, or the President who signed it into law, we have people who need remedial high school civics, or at best are thinking with their hearts and not their heads, bashing the judge who simply followed the law. Sorry, folks. Most of you get an "F" on scholarship on this one. Time for summer school. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,603 #7 August 24, 2010 The comment about Mrs. Reagan was because she is for stem cell research. They weren't bashing her. It's fair game to bash her for consulting psychics and being a little too image-conscious when she was the First Lady, but she's been a completely class act for years. Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #8 August 25, 2010 Quotehttp://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100823/ap_on_sc/us_judge_stem_cell Once again science being impeded by superstition. I am still waiting for any one of our local conservetards in SC to come forth decrying these ACTIVIST JUDGES Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #9 August 25, 2010 QuoteQuotehttp://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100823/ap_on_sc/us_judge_stem_cell Once again science being impeded by superstition. I am still waiting for any one of our local conservetards in SC to come forth decrying these ACTIVIST JUDGES Go back and read the comment about the judge in post 3 and 4 - not sure how right of center #4 is - but I'm willing to guess that it is closer to center than you are.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #10 August 25, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuotehttp://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100823/ap_on_sc/us_judge_stem_cell Once again science being impeded by superstition. I am still waiting for any one of our local conservetards in SC to come forth decrying these ACTIVIST JUDGES Go back and read the comment about the judge in post 3 and 4 - not sure how right of center #4 is - but I'm willing to guess that it is closer to center than you are. I was waiting for you and the usual suspects.... want to make a statement about ACTIVIST JUDGES???? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #11 August 25, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuotehttp://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100823/ap_on_sc/us_judge_stem_cell Once again science being impeded by superstition. I am still waiting for any one of our local conservetards in SC to come forth decrying these ACTIVIST JUDGES Go back and read the comment about the judge in post 3 and 4 - not sure how right of center #4 is - but I'm willing to guess that it is closer to center than you are. I was waiting for you and the usual suspects.... want to make a statement about ACTIVIST JUDGES???? Find where I have in the past and I will again.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
