mnealtx 0 #51 August 10, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteI didn't, genius; can't you read? See, when you neo-cons get stuck on a given thread, they dig shit out of >6 months ago that was no big deal anyway. Like you bring up GDP/Real GDP, when you were the one that changed your post while it was being replied to? Nice try, I was talking real GDP, you tried to slide in nominal to mitigate your heroes mess. To Dems, GDP makes us look good, you guys not so much; why would I need to deceive? You go ahead and believe whatever alternate version of reality makes you feel better, Lucky - you and I both know you added "real" in on an edit.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #52 August 10, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote Only FIVE? That's about 5% of the myths and lies circulated about Obama alone, without the rest of his party, as a quick look at Snopes, Factcheck or Politifact will show. The statements and accusations are only incorrect if you believe in him. Which you do. In your fantasy world, the statements and accusations are incorrect. Well, if you can demonstrate that Politifact, Factcheck and Snopes have a bias, you would be correct. I very much doubt you can do that, however. Easy . . . I guess you didn't bother to check the accuracy of your source (or even read it to the bottom)... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
timmyfitz 0 #53 August 10, 2010 QuoteLie much? Nope. QuoteYOU'RE WRONG, I ASKED NOT STATED. Typical misquotes tho. Really? Lucky...- Quotehttp://www.theonion.com/content/video/how_to_find_a_masculine_halloween Being the Onion I can't tell for sure. Is it satire meant to be total sarcatism, but with a flair of real intent? I'm sure the Onion would say it's pure sarcasm, but they really mean it. Belgian_Draft-(reply to Lucky...) QuoteYeah, it's for real....NOT! The fact that you even had to ask explains 99% of your posts. Lucky...-(replying to Belgian_draft QuoteI think it is real and legit, but hidden behind the guise of satire. I mean after all, it is teh Onion, the rag of the RW homophobic purveyors of the proposed homophoc 28th Amendment. Of course you a nd yours support the proposed 28th, yet claim this is pure satire. SNL could pull this off as pure humor, when teh Onion does it, it has a solid foundation of it being meant. Just using your words. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1981 to 1988 is 7 years-Kallend (oops, it's actually 8 years Kallend) The decade of the 80's was from 1980 to 1989. 10 years. If you remove 1980 and 1989 you have 1981 to 1988. 8 years. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #54 August 10, 2010 QuoteQuoteLie much? Nope. Lucky- Quotehttp://www.theonion.com/content/video/how_to_find_a_masculine_halloween Being the Onion I can't tell for sure. Is it satire meant to be total sarcatism, but with a flair of real intent? I'm sure the Onion would say it's pure sarcasm, but they really mean it. Belgian_Draft- QuoteYeah, it's for real....NOT! The fact that you even had to ask explains 99% of your posts. Lucky- QuoteI think it is real and legit, but hidden behind the guise of satire. I mean after all, it is teh Onion, the rag of the RW homophobic purveyors of the proposed homophoc 28th Amendment. Of course you a nd yours support the proposed 28th, yet claim this is pure satire. SNL could pull this off as pure humor, when teh Onion does it, it has a solid foundation of it being meant. Just using your words. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1981 to 1988 is 7 years-Kallend (oops, it's actually 8 years Kallend) The decade of the 80's was from 1980 to 1989. 10 years. If you remove 1980 and 1989 you have 1981 to 1988. 8 years. Facts - Accuracy - meh - it means so little to the dems.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #55 August 10, 2010 Quote Facts - Accuracy - meh - it means so little to the dems. And, apparently, nothing at all to the GOP www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/rulings/pants-fire/... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
timmyfitz 0 #56 August 10, 2010 QuoteQuote Facts - Accuracy - meh - it means so little to the dems. And, apparently, nothing at all to the GOP www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/rulings/pants-fire/ QuoteSometimes the messenger reveals himself to be clueless. That's why it's important to establish that the messenger has credibility.-Kallend ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1981 to 1988 is 7 years-Kallend (oops, it's actually 8 years Kallend) The decade of the 80's was from 1980 to 1989. 10 years. If you remove 1980 and 1989 you have 1981 to 1988. 8 years. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #57 August 10, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuote Facts - Accuracy - meh - it means so little to the dems. And, apparently, nothing at all to the GOP www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/rulings/pants-fire/ QuoteSometimes the messenger reveals himself to be clueless. That's why it's important to establish that the messenger has credibility.-Kallend ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1981 to 1988 is 7 years-Kallend (oops, it's actually 8 years Kallend) The decade of the 80's was from 1980 to 1989. 10 years. If you remove 1980 and 1989 you have 1981 to 1988. 8 years. So you still think Reagan was president for 9 years. I guess that shows who is the clueless one.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
