0
shropshire

The Clintons kid gets married ...... why ...

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

What're you talkin' about? You have Sir Mick Jagger, Sir Paul McCartney, Sir Elton John and so-on.

What do we have? Lindsey Lohan, Britney Spears?[:/] Maybe because, I didn't know about him. :$


Chuck



And currently: Antoine Dodson. :S:D


I don't know how that one slipped-by!:D


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hope the couple is happy and can avoid having a lot of the crap in their parents lives spill over into their private lives.

Being the kid of a high profile politician, let alone two, must really stink.

But all the money won't hurt either I suppose. (Until the government takes it all away).

Maybe she's not too pretty,,,but she's not ugly either - just plain. No biggie.

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Hope the couple is happy and can avoid having a lot of the crap in their parents lives spill over into their private lives.

Being the kid of a high profile politician, let alone two, must really stink.

But all the money won't hurt either I suppose. (Until the government takes it all away).

Maybe she's not too pretty,,,but she's not ugly either - just plain. No biggie.



I think, they'll find a way to avoid things. Chelsea has done a fairly good job of it up until her wedding. That of course, draws the media. I hope they both do good and are happy.


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

She married some fugly ass dude!
Skinny as hell, looks as if he has some sort of back problem, looks 100lbs wet and appears to be affraid of the sun?
My god couldn't she find her self a more dudly dude?
Maybe some guy with a tan and a straight spine!
I mean really, I know she's not much of a catch but you would think she coudl do better!

Well gives ugly MOFOS like me hope.



Don't bet y'shirt on it:P

(.)Y(.)
Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Fucking amazing :S

A relatively simple thread about the newsworthyness of someones wedding, turns into a Political bitchfest:S:S:S



no, it started with you whining about the attention paid to it. IOW, a political bitch.


woteva

(.)Y(.)
Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Thank you. I just have a hard time trying to digest the idea of folks admiring bubble-headed, bleach-blonde trailer trash. I guess you can make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.


Chuck



I agree. I can't understand the interest in people who are famous for being famous when there are so many remarkable people out there.



It boggles my pea-sized brain, the way the American public gets so wrapped-up in admiring gangsters, trailer trash, dope-heads and degenerates in general. What's with Joe Schmo flashing gang signs? Then too, is it the 'person' or their money that people get so absorbed?


Chuck



Americans are #1 on the planet when it comes to living vicariously through others; except maybe Brits and their soccer fanaticism.

It explains the ridiculous near-religious nature of pro sports, the unGodly amount we pay actors and other entertainers, the success of the E! channel, why nobody truly qualified for national level leadership wants the job, etc, etc.
" . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Thank you. I just have a hard time trying to digest the idea of folks admiring bubble-headed, bleach-blonde trailer trash. I guess you can make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.


Chuck



I agree. I can't understand the interest in people who are famous for being famous when there are so many remarkable people out there.



It boggles my pea-sized brain, the way the American public gets so wrapped-up in admiring gangsters, trailer trash, dope-heads and degenerates in general. What's with Joe Schmo flashing gang signs? Then too, is it the 'person' or their money that people get so absorbed?


Chuck



Americans are #1 on the planet when it comes to living vicariously through others; except maybe Brits and their soccer fanaticism.

It explains the ridiculous near-religious nature of pro sports, the unGodly amount we pay actors and other entertainers, the success of the E! channel, why nobody truly qualified for national level leadership wants the job, etc, etc.



I can understand that. That also explains 'fan clubs'.


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Americans are #1 on the planet when it comes to living vicariously through others; except maybe Brits and their soccer fanaticism.



Or the rest of the Euro nations and their soccer team (quite a few Euro players make more than the entire US team does). Or the Argentines and their team. Or the Brazilians and their team.

Can't think of the last time an American player got killed after making a mistake in a game.

Royalty is also held pretty damn high in many countries. You don't want to be heard disrespecting the king of Thailand (3-15 years in jail), for example.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


Americans are #1 on the planet when it comes to living vicariously through others; except maybe Brits and their soccer fanaticism.



Or the rest of the Euro nations and their soccer team (quite a few Euro players make more than the entire US team does). Or the Argentines and their team. Or the Brazilians and their team.

Can't think of the last time an American player got killed after making a mistake in a game.

Royalty is also held pretty damn high in many countries. You don't want to be heard disrespecting the king of Thailand (3-15 years in jail), for example.



Of course we execute more than most and executed people for crimes committed as juveniles just what, 6-8 years ago. And there were 7 countries at the time doing so, so let's not act as tho we are lenient.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Of course we execute more than most and executed people for crimes committed as juveniles just what, 6-8 years ago. And there were 7 countries at the time doing so, so let's not act as tho we are lenient.



There's a lot more than 7 doing that, buddy. Those are just the ones that bother with any sense of due process.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


ZigZagMarquis.... going after someone's kid just because you dislike their parent, that's cold.

What did she ever do to you?




:D

Nothing. I just think she's unattractive and her wedding wasn't news-worthy.

It has about as much to do with anything as defending Bill Clinton's crimes with that of others.

:P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Sorry for the tread drift... can we now go back to talking about the marriage of the Clinton's horse faced kid?



Now now, don't be too harsh on Princess Chelsea. After all we can't choose our parents and she does come from Billary's genes. :ph34r:


Try not to worry about the things you have no control over

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


Of course we execute more than most and executed people for crimes committed as juveniles just what, 6-8 years ago. And there were 7 countries at the time doing so, so let's not act as tho we are lenient.



There's a lot more than 7 doing that, buddy. Those are just the ones that bother with any sense of due process.



7 known. None the less, we were as depraved as the Republican of Congo, I wouldn't be waving the flag too high and hard, a short time ago we were depraved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


ZigZagMarquis.... going after someone's kid just because you dislike their parent, that's cold.

What did she ever do to you?




:D

Nothing. I just think she's unattractive and her wedding wasn't news-worthy.

It has about as much to do with anything as defending Bill Clinton's crimes with that of others.

:P


Not to you, it was news-worthy to much of the free world and certainly the US.

You've shown us your character by going after a non-political figure, the daughter of a president you hate. Hey, Obama's kids are

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Sorry for the tread drift... can we now go back to talking about the marriage of the Clinton's horse faced kid?



Now now, don't be too harsh on Princess Chelsea. After all we can't choose our parents and she does come from Billary's genes. :ph34r:


Bill isn't that bad looking, it's Hillary that looks like a donkey. :P
"Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay. I retract my statements... except about Bill Clinton being a guilty bastard. You don't think so. Thats fine. Whatever.


:D:D:D


Look Lucky. You have no real idea about my character. Just like I have none about yours.

You take this stuff here waaaay too serious. Get over yourself. I'm working on the same.

Good luck.

Cheers!

;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote


Of course we execute more than most and executed people for crimes committed as juveniles just what, 6-8 years ago. And there were 7 countries at the time doing so, so let's not act as tho we are lenient.



There's a lot more than 7 doing that, buddy. Those are just the ones that bother with any sense of due process.



7 known. None the less, we were as depraved as the Republican of Congo, I wouldn't be waving the flag too high and hard, a short time ago we were depraved.



BTW, are you actually equating convicted murderers with soccer players who accidentally score own goals?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Okay. I retract my statements... except about Bill Clinton being a guilty bastard. You don't think so. Thats fine. Whatever.


:D:D:D


Look Lucky. You have no real idea about my character. Just like I have none about yours.

You take this stuff here waaaay too serious. Get over yourself. I'm working on the same.

Good luck.

Cheers!

;)



Politicians are ALL fair game, not their kids. It seems that your family values party thinks the kids are fair game, in contrast with your very platforms. No abortion, no children's HC, and make the kids feel small; what a great party.

Good that you retracted, not that I care, but for your sake.

Cheers back. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote


Of course we execute more than most and executed people for crimes committed as juveniles just what, 6-8 years ago. And there were 7 countries at the time doing so, so let's not act as tho we are lenient.



There's a lot more than 7 doing that, buddy. Those are just the ones that bother with any sense of due process.



7 known. None the less, we were as depraved as the Republican of Congo, I wouldn't be waving the flag too high and hard, a short time ago we were depraved.



BTW, are you actually equating convicted murderers with soccer players who accidentally score own goals?



Put that together for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It seems that your family values party thinks the kids are fair game, in contrast with your very platforms. No abortion, no children's HC, and make the kids feel small; what a great party.



Dude.

I don't know whether to laugh at that or tell you to give it a fucking rest.

I gues I'll just laugh.

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D


Later. Skies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

It seems that your family values party thinks the kids are fair game, in contrast with your very platforms. No abortion, no children's HC, and make the kids feel small; what a great party.



Dude.

I don't know whether to laugh at that or tell you to give it a fucking rest.

I gues I'll just laugh.

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D


Later. Skies.


Ah, just go for #3: Go back to beating up little girls and hammering Libertarian BS, then vote Republican and tout family values. You know, all that conservative hypocritical stuff as usual.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

... is this NEWS:S



No Tony it's not news, out side of the colonials hyper ego no one really give a shit.


Yes, of course - I mean, nobody would have news about whatshername Spice getting her purse stolen, or whether Beckham was going to come back and coach the English team, no....


:P
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0