Recommended Posts
QuoteI don't really care how it's funded.
Good to know that you are for fiscal responsibility.
I think the attachment mnealtx posted fits your attitude to a tee.
kallend 2,148
QuoteQuoteI don't really care how it's funded.
Good to know that you are for fiscal responsibility.
I think the attachment mnealtx posted fits your attitude to a tee.
Funny how right wingers suddenly discover fiscal responsibility now that their profligate borrow-and-spenders are out of office.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
Bolas 5
QuoteQuoteQuoteI don't really care how it's funded.
Good to know that you are for fiscal responsibility.
I think the attachment mnealtx posted fits your attitude to a tee.
Funny how right wingers suddenly discover fiscal responsibility now that their profligate borrow-and-spenders are out of office.
Couldn't possibly be in this economic meltdown that they are seeing the error of their ways...

If ya can't be good, look good, if that fails, make 'em laugh.
QuoteQuoteQuoteI don't really care how it's funded.
Good to know that you are for fiscal responsibility.
I think the attachment mnealtx posted fits your attitude to a tee.
Funny how right wingers suddenly discover fiscal responsibility now that their profligate borrow-and-spenders are out of office.
Funny how you keep using this argument to justify bad fiscal responsibility for the group you support.
Two wrongs do make a right in your world apparently.
QuoteQuoteFor how long of a period do you feel the government should provide unemployment benefits? A year? 18 months? 36 months? Indefinitely?
As long as there is a lot of unemp, 9.5% then it's warranted. Let's say 7% is a good time to let up as a start.
What part of "for how long" don't you understand?
Edit to add: In case the concept slipped by you.....for how long do you think any one person should be able to collect unemployment benefits from the government?
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a
kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the
object we are trying to hit.
Amazon 7
Quote
It must really suck to be an ideologue.
Come this Nov you will see for yourself
Oh so you think the GOP will invite everyone to the BIG WHITE rePUBIClown Circus Tent?
billvon 3,118
By that measure, all Republicans want to do is borrow money from China to kill innocent Iraqis. Of the two I think the Democratic goal is a little less vile.
kallend 2,148
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI don't really care how it's funded.
Good to know that you are for fiscal responsibility.
I think the attachment mnealtx posted fits your attitude to a tee.
Funny how right wingers suddenly discover fiscal responsibility now that their profligate borrow-and-spenders are out of office.
Funny how you keep using this argument to justify bad fiscal responsibility for the group you support.
Two wrongs do make a right in your world apparently.
Two wrongs from the right, Saint Ronald Reagan and G.W. Bush, between them multiplied the national debt by a factor of nearly 6. On average the neo-con presidents raised the national debt by 10.8% EVERY YEAR.
The three largest increases in debt/GDP ratio since 1945 have been under presidents Reagan, Bush and Bush.
Under the Reagan/Bush administrations the USA went from the world's largest creditor to the world's largest debtor.
From July to October 2008, while Bush2 was president, the national debt increased by over $1 Trillion. In Oct 2008 alone the national debt increased by $500 Billion. No month or 4 month period before or since have seen such large increases.
Did all this borrowed money go to make us safer, educate our children or improve our infrastructure? No, mostly it went to make the rich even richer.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
riddler 0
Quoteborrow money from China to kill innocent Iraqis
Not to mention 92-year-old Afghanis and pregnant women.
http://www.facebook.com/#!/video/video.php?v=416362127434&ref=mf
QuoteQuote
It must really suck to be an ideologue.
Come this Nov you will see for yourself
Oh so you think the GOP will invite everyone to the BIG WHITE rePUBIClown Circus Tent?
everyone that is a registered voter- you betcha.
might get more exclusive again in December, of course.
kallend 2,148
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI don't really care how it's funded.
Good to know that you are for fiscal responsibility.
I think the attachment mnealtx posted fits your attitude to a tee.
Funny how right wingers suddenly discover fiscal responsibility now that their profligate borrow-and-spenders are out of office.
Couldn't possibly be in this economic meltdown that they are seeing the error of their ways...![]()
No, I think it's more likely to be pure hypocrisy.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
rehmwa 2
QuoteQuoteCouldn't possibly be in this economic meltdown that they are seeing the error of their ways...
No, I think it's more likely to be pure hypocrisy.
most of self proclaimed cons here complained about Rep spending also
however, you are correct - Libs are consistent
they want to spend us into ruin during a Republican administration
and they want to spend us into ruin during a Democratic administration
congrats
...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants
Quote
The three largest increases in debt/GDP ratio since 1945 have been under presidents Reagan, Bush and Bush.
But unless (and perhaps anyway) Obama loses his reelection bid, he's going to join them.
Quote
From July to October 2008, while Bush2 was president, the national debt increased by over $1 Trillion. In Oct 2008 alone the national debt increased by $500 Billion. No month or 4 month period before or since have seen such large increases.
Sounds like bad accounting, since the actual cost of TARP is going to be around 100B, not the 700B face value. As this money has come back, the Democrats have seen it as money to be respent without having to treat it as new debt, even though that's just as stupid as in college when you pay the bill with a credit card and take "free" cash from your buddies. And we already know that TARP was not desired by many of the participants, so painting it as a bailout of the rich is another simplification.
Extended benefits may be fine, but something else has to give on the budget. Get out of Iraq, buy fewer F35s, scrap the Mars mission, or take the money out of the Stimupork package.
kallend 2,148
QuoteQuote
The three largest increases in debt/GDP ratio since 1945 have been under presidents Reagan, Bush and Bush.
But unless (and perhaps anyway) Obama loses his reelection bid, he's going to join them.Quote
From July to October 2008, while Bush2 was president, the national debt increased by over $1 Trillion. In Oct 2008 alone the national debt increased by $500 Billion. No month or 4 month period before or since have seen such large increases.
Sounds like bad accounting, .
Tell that to the US Treasury - it's from their data. I guess you'll do it right after you tell the IRS how to do its job.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
airdvr 210
QuoteFactoid indirectly related to the topic:
According to a report I got today, only 25% of 2010 college graduates with bachelor's degrees have found jobs or admission to graduate school so far. Even traditionally employable majors like engineering are way down.
Summer's not over yet. I don't know of many college grads that aren't drowning them selves in beer or whatever right now.
Destinations by Roxanne
Ewwwww, so shrewd
I find your Rants somewhat confusing...but I'm sure its just me.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites