0
mnealtx

Good for Barney

Recommended Posts

Credit where it's due:

Complete article at the link.
Quote

Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) on Friday strongly condemned comedian Kathy Griffin for joking on her Bravo network reality show that Sen. Scott Brown’s (R-Mass.) daughters are “prostitutes.”

Griffin made the quip to CNN reporters in a segment of her program – called “My Life on the D-List” – that aired Tuesday. Frank, who appeared on a separate portion of the show, sent a letter to Griffin Friday defending Brown and his family.


Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) on Friday strongly condemned comedian Kathy Griffin for joking...



Hello hello....are you out there?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAVgJQVo2oE&feature=related

There original is good too:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=befAwVNfkj4&feature=related
Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

I can't access youtube, sorry.



It's allright....we just gotta start realizing that all politicians are on the same side....duh.


it's genius!


Theirs?[:/]


Pretty much, yup.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

I can't access youtube, sorry.



It's allright....we just gotta start realizing that all politicians are on the same side....duh.


it's genius!


Theirs?[:/]


No:

Republicans = side of corporations / wealthy

Dems = side of the people


I guess RWers want to pretend that it's all teh same since their side has fucked things up.

And if it was all the same, as your side claims, then you wouldn't be so much for getting your side in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

I can't access youtube, sorry.



It's allright....we just gotta start realizing that all politicians are on the same side....duh.


it's genius!


Theirs?[:/]


No:

Republicans = side of corporations / wealthy

Dems = side of the people


I guess RWers want to pretend that it's all teh same since their side has fucked things up.

And if it was all the same, as your side claims, then you wouldn't be so much for getting your side in.


WOW...................

Simply WOW

who "hires" people to work?

Who PAYS for Building factories for people to make a living in?

Who pays the bulk of taxes so you can blame the big guy?:S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

I can't access youtube, sorry.



It's allright....we just gotta start realizing that all politicians are on the same side....duh.


it's genius!


Theirs?[:/]


No:

Republicans = side of corporations / wealthy

Dems = side of the people


I guess RWers want to pretend that it's all teh same since their side has fucked things up.

And if it was all the same, as your side claims, then you wouldn't be so much for getting your side in.


WOW...................

Simply WOW

who "hires" people to work?

Who PAYS for Building factories for people to make a living in?

Who pays the bulk of taxes so you can blame the big guy?:S


WOW, I mean, WOW, OMG, WOW. Is that sufficeint or are more wow's needed?

Then fall to the rest of the Neo-cons and fail to show me a tax cut that has led to prosperity. I didn't think so, back to your normally sceduled lock-stepped cliches.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Republicans = side of corporations / wealthy

Dems = side of the people



I used to believe that also, not anymore. America now has a one party government with two heads. They play a game for personal power by manipulating us, the voters.

This November vote for the Independent/Conservative candidates.
Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



Republicans = side of corporations / wealthy

Dems = side of the people



I used to believe that also, not anymore. America now has a one party government with two heads. They play a game for personal power by manipulating us, the voters.

This November vote for the Independent/Conservative candidates.



Wait, if you say it's the same, then why ask for votes for the Indep / conserv candidates? Can't you see your contradiction there?

Repubs - cut taxes (the rich pay most taxes and have most of the money), social programs.

Dems - increase taxes and social programs.

Is it real hard to see the stark differences?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Wait, if you say it's the same, then why ask for votes for the Indep / conserv candidates?



To shake the system and hope for positive change for a change.
Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



Republicans = side of corporations / wealthy

Dems = side of the people



I used to believe that also, not anymore. America now has a one party government with two heads. They play a game for personal power by manipulating us, the voters.

This November vote for the Independent/Conservative candidates.



There are no independent/conservative candidates any more than there are independent/liberal candidates. At least, not viable ones, i.e., with even remotely the kind of money needed to mount a serious campaign.

Democrats in office = corruption, cronyism, self-dealing and a bit of kindness human compassion

versus

Republicans = corruption, cronyism, self-dealing and abject selfishness coupled with mean-spiritedness.

Nobody else gets elected in the US above the local level.
On balance, I'd like my shit sandwich with a side of compassion, please.
Oh, and a pickle. I love pickles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Repubs - cut taxes (the rich pay most taxes and have most of the money), social programs.

Dems - increase taxes and social programs.



Repubs... think you should try to take care of yourself and will help a *little* if you need it.

Dems.... think that the Govt should provide you everything and that an individual matters very little.

If you work for a living, one is the clear choice.

If you want others to give you things.... again a clear choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Repubs - cut taxes (the rich pay most taxes and have most of the money), social programs.

Dems - increase taxes and social programs.



Repubs... think you should try to take care of yourself and will help a *little* if you need it.

Dems.... think that the Govt should provide you everything and that an individual matters very little.

If you work for a living, one is the clear choice.

If you want others to give you things.... again a clear choice.



You are 30 years out of date as proved by the toilet our economy is swimming in by the TRILLIONS in debt that can be laid right at the feet of the people you worship. Interesting fantasy world you are living in but since the advent of VOO DOO DOO economics that republican party is long gone, replaced by a ne0-cons and a desire to bring theocracy to every part of everyones life.

PRAISE THE LORD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

I can't access youtube, sorry.



It's allright....we just gotta start realizing that all politicians are on the same side....duh.


it's genius!


Theirs?[:/]


No:

Republicans = side of corporations / wealthy

Dems = side of the people


I guess RWers want to pretend that it's all teh same since their side has fucked things up.

And if it was all the same, as your side claims, then you wouldn't be so much for getting your side in.


WOW...................

Simply WOW

who "hires" people to work?

Who PAYS for Building factories for people to make a living in?

Who pays the bulk of taxes so you can blame the big guy?:S


WOW, I mean, WOW, OMG, WOW. Is that sufficeint or are more wow's needed?

Then fall to the rest of the Neo-cons and fail to show me a tax cut that has led to prosperity. I didn't think so, back to your normally sceduled lock-stepped cliches.


. . . and because of your lack of ability to adress the issues, you post this.[:/]

Answer this . . . what would you do if the guy that employs you decided that he was tired of paying for all the taxes and shut his business down?

Why don't you just answer the questions instead of posting your meaningless childish bullshit.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



Wait, if you say it's the same, then why ask for votes for the Indep / conserv candidates?



To shake the system and hope for positive change for a change.



Oh, I thought these were positive changes:

http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdp_glance.htm

http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?request_action=wh&graph_name=LN_cpsbref3

http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=%5EDJI+Interactive#chart2:symbol=^dji;range=5y;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=on;source=undefined

I guess you mean massive shifting of wealth to the already very wealthy as a positive change, my bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Repubs - cut taxes (the rich pay most taxes and have most of the money), social programs.

Dems - increase taxes and social programs.



Quote

Repubs... think you should try to take care of yourself and will help AN EXTREMELY VERY LIITLE if you need it.



Fixd it. And any HC is above the help bar. 1 tiny helkp for the little guy, 3 huge scoops for teh rich and greedy.

Quote

Dems.... think that the Govt should provide you everything and that an individual matters very little.



Show examples. They thinkthe gov should assist and guarantee things like vet care, basic care for citizens, beyond that you call any social svs as cradle-to-grave; extreme missuse of the term.

Quote

If you work for a living, one is the clear choice.



As in ounch a clock? As in be in the margin that has an AGI of 33k year, as in gross 40-50k/yr? Yea, that margin pays 3% of all income tax and benefits from tax and social svs increase, doesn't get helped by tax cuts, my friends.

Quote

If you want others to give you things.... again a clear choice.



Right, if you want gov protections from the bigs, you can't have Republicans in there slicing DOL rules to shit, as well as appointing employer-friendly (activist as the RWers say) judges and justices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Oh, I thought these were positive changes:



There you go again, thrying that whole thinking thing . . you should really leave that to someone more qualified and able.:D:ph34r:
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Repubs - cut taxes (the rich pay most taxes and have most of the money), social programs.

Dems - increase taxes and social programs.



Repubs... think you should try to take care of yourself and will help a *little* if you need it.

Dems.... think that the Govt should provide you everything and that an individual matters very little.

If you work for a living, one is the clear choice.

If you want others to give you things.... again a clear choice.



You are 30 years out of date as proved by the toilet our economy is swimming in by the TRILLIONS in debt that can be laid right at the feet of the people you worship. Interesting fantasy world you are living in but since the advent of VOO DOO DOO economics that republican party is long gone, replaced by a ne0-cons and a desire to bring theocracy to every part of everyones life.

PRAISE THE LORD



Look where Siena has ranked Reagan and others from 2002 and again in 2010, it appears teh emphasis is on economy matters.

Teddy Roosevelt - from 3 to 2

Hoover - 31 to 36

FDR - 1 to 1

Reagan - 16 to 18

Clinton - 18 to 13

GWB - 18 to 39

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States

It seems most / all ranking shifts have to do with the economic impact of today's economy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

I can't access youtube, sorry.



It's allright....we just gotta start realizing that all politicians are on the same side....duh.


it's genius!


Theirs?[:/]


No:

Republicans = side of corporations / wealthy

Dems = side of the people


I guess RWers want to pretend that it's all teh same since their side has fucked things up.

And if it was all the same, as your side claims, then you wouldn't be so much for getting your side in.


WOW...................

Simply WOW

who "hires" people to work?

Who PAYS for Building factories for people to make a living in?

Who pays the bulk of taxes so you can blame the big guy?:S


WOW, I mean, WOW, OMG, WOW. Is that sufficeint or are more wow's needed?

Then fall to the rest of the Neo-cons and fail to show me a tax cut that has led to prosperity. I didn't think so, back to your normally sceduled lock-stepped cliches.


Quote

. . . and because of your lack of ability to adress the issues, you post this.[:/]



Issue: Costs / taxes

ME: Then fall to the rest of the Neo-cons and fail to show me a tax cut that has led to prosperity.

HINT: I was aksing a question based upon the issues raised. Just because it's one you don't like doesn't mean it's not a valid question in-line with the issue.

Quote

Answer this . . . what would you do if the guy that employs you decided that he was tired of paying for all the taxes and shut his business down?



Go get a new job. Taxes are alomost as low as they have ever been since WWI, so that's a lmae rhetorical question. Payroll taxes are EXTREMELY LOW as compared to the rest of the world.

Quote

Why don't you just answer the questions instead of posting your meaningless childish bullshit.



OK, I'll reiterate my childish BS question for you to ignore:

Then fall to the rest of the Neo-cons and fail to show me a tax cut that has led to prosperity.

Now ignore it and declare victory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



Oh, I thought these were positive changes:



There you go again, thrying that whole thinking thing . . you should really leave that to someone more qualified and able.:D:ph34r:


http://www.bea.gov/...l/gdp/gdp_glance.htm

http://data.bls.gov/...aph_name=LN_cpsbref3

http://finance.yahoo.com/...=on;source=undefined

So the DJIA greatly improving, jobs stopping teh 3.4% unemp jump, then declining .6% and the GDP going from the toilet to sky isn't the improvement you were looking for either? Then tellme what areas of improvement you were looking for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0