yourmomma 0 #76 July 18, 2010 Ha that's funny. CMU taught me the shit the folks at MIT were too stupid to remember. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,611 #77 July 18, 2010 QuoteYou may think what you wish - I saw it more of an indictment against the basic "anyone that doesn't think as I do is stupid" theme of many of their posts. You can read it that way if you like - but you should realise that says a whole lot more about your attitude than the study says about Quade et al.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #78 July 18, 2010 Quote Quote You may think what you wish - I saw it more of an indictment against the basic "anyone that doesn't think as I do is stupid" theme of many of their posts. You can read it that way if you like - but you should realise that says a whole lot more about your attitude than the study says about Quade et al. Oh well there we go then It is only about mnealtx's attitude Nice"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #79 July 18, 2010 Quote Quote What a low level attack. Is that your new kind of *weapon*? You should stick with your usual gun threads. Miserable. Not only low class and miserable, but the poll is extraordinarily poorly worded even for one of JR's. If professors SHOULD have sex with their students they would have to be bisexual and have lots of stamina, as well as being very quick. I taught well over 200 students in my classes last year, of both genders, and not all of them were "hot". I think a mandate to have sex with them would be a big problem. He didn't imply EVERY student. Thanks for playing. Try again. You mentioned that there are "nutters in all walks of life" . . . leading us to believe that because of the subject of this poll, you are wholly against the profs having sex with their students. It seems that the score at this time is 26 for 29 against . . . Which do you stand for? Do you support that profs should not be penalised for having sex with any of their current students, or are you against?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #80 July 18, 2010 Quote Any unbalance of power in a sexual relationship, whether teacher/student, boss/employee (usually a secretary), cop/woman motorist, Senator/page, etc. is a likely breach of ethics and possibly illegal. Bingo. The lack of balance of power implicates the nature and quality of the consent. How valid is the consent of a student who may feel that a grade can be at stake? What about the inequity of access to the professor faced by other students. If the professor finds that true love is there, then the professor should do the honorable thing and resign the course to another professor. There is no way to do it without the appearance of impropriety because it IS improper. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #81 July 18, 2010 QuoteQuote Any unbalance of power in a sexual relationship, whether teacher/student, boss/employee (usually a secretary), cop/woman motorist, Senator/page, etc. is a likely breach of ethics and possibly illegal. Bingo. The lack of balance of power implicates the nature and quality of the consent. How valid is the consent of a student who may feel that a grade can be at stake? What about the inequity of access to the professor faced by other students. If the professor finds that true love is there, then the professor should do the honorable thing and resign the course to another professor. There is no way to do it without the appearance of impropriety because it IS improper. Wait a MINUTE! Are you saying that there are peoplke out there teaching our counties future leaders, and they are UNETHICAL? But how can that be?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,611 #82 July 18, 2010 Quote Quote Quote You may think what you wish - I saw it more of an indictment against the basic "anyone that doesn't think as I do is stupid" theme of many of their posts. You can read it that way if you like - but you should realise that says a whole lot more about your attitude than the study says about Quade et al. Oh well there we go then It is only about mnealtx's attitude Nice Surely you see the humour? Mike has managed to take a study that says politically knowledgeable people tend to be quite stubborn about what they believe and decided that it is to be applied mainly to Liberals and people he disagrees with. You see what he's done there, right?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #83 July 18, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote You may think what you wish - I saw it more of an indictment against the basic "anyone that doesn't think as I do is stupid" theme of many of their posts. You can read it that way if you like - but you should realise that says a whole lot more about your attitude than the study says about Quade et al. Oh well there we go then It is only about mnealtx's attitude Nice Surely you see the humour? Mike has managed to take a study that says politically knowledgeable people tend to be quite stubborn about what they believe and decided that it is to be applied mainly to Liberals and people he disagrees with. You see what he's done there, right? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA... riiiiight.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #84 July 18, 2010 QuoteIt's an obvious dig (he denies it, of course, but it IS obvious). Just playing your own game, by giving you a taste of your own medicine. Therefore you've got no room to complain, since it's your own tactic. Tony Rezko was one of Gov. Blagojevich's inner circle, and kingpin of the political kickback tactics. Tony Rezko attended the Illinois Institute of Technology. kalled is a professor at the Illinois Institute of Technology. Now, I'm not saying that the two have anything to do with each other. And it's just pure happenstance that I happened to post these two true facts in the same message together. I mean absolutely nothing by it! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,184 #85 July 18, 2010 QuoteQuoteIt's an obvious dig (he denies it, of course, but it IS obvious). Just playing your own game, by giving you a taste of your own medicine. Therefore you've got no room to complain, since it's your own tactic. Tony Rezko was one of Gov. Blagojevich's inner circle, and kingpin of the political kickback tactics. Tony Rezko attended the Illinois Institute of Technology. kalled is a professor at the Illinois Institute of Technology. Now, I'm not saying that the two have anything to do with each other. And it's just pure happenstance that I happened to post these two true facts in the same message together. I mean absolutely nothing by it! I'm not complaining - it's an interesting topic worthy of discussion. It also illustrates the worst in you and rushmc very nicely.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #86 July 18, 2010 QuoteIt also illustrates the worst in you very nicely. Oh the irony. When I mimic your own tactics, it's "the worst". Good laugh. If only you could recognize it within yourself when you do it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,184 #87 July 18, 2010 QuoteQuoteIt also illustrates the worst in you very nicely. Oh the irony. When I mimic your own tactics, it's "the worst". Good laugh. If only you could recognize it within yourself when you do it. QED... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 3 #88 July 18, 2010 QuoteQuote Any unbalance of power in a sexual relationship, whether teacher/student, boss/employee (usually a secretary), cop/woman motorist, Senator/page, etc. is a likely breach of ethics and possibly illegal. Bingo. The lack of balance of power implicates the nature and quality of the consent. How valid is the consent of a student who may feel that a grade can be at stake? What about the inequity of access to the professor faced by other students. If the professor finds that true love is there, then the professor should do the honorable thing and resign the course to another professor. There is no way to do it without the appearance of impropriety because it IS improper. Agreed. Yale University has recently taken this a step further. It has a blanket policy: No teacher may have a sexual or "amorous" relationship with any undergraduate student, even if consensual. Period. http://www.yale.edu/equalopportunity/policies/ QuotePolicy on Teacher-Student Consensual Relations Undergraduate students are particularly vulnerable to the unequal institutional power inherent in the teacher-student relationship and the potential for coercion, because of their age and relative lack of maturity. Therefore, no teacher shall have a sexual or amorous relationship with any undergraduate student, regardless of whether the teacher currently exercises or expects to have any pedagogical or supervisory responsibilities over that student. I agree with and approve of this policy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #89 July 18, 2010 Quote Which do you stand for? Do you support that profs should not be penalised for having sex with any of their current students, or are you against? Just posting this as he may have missed it.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #90 July 18, 2010 QuoteQuote Which do you stand for? Do you support that profs should not be penalised for having sex with any of their current students, or are you against? Just posting this as he may have missed it. Does this equate to Tandem Masters boning their young tandem students??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 3 #91 July 19, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuote Which do you stand for? Do you support that profs should not be penalised for having sex with any of their current students, or are you against? Just posting this as he may have missed it. Does this equate to Tandem Masters boning their young tandem students??? I think it does. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bolas 5 #92 July 19, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote Which do you stand for? Do you support that profs should not be penalised for having sex with any of their current students, or are you against? Just posting this as he may have missed it. Does this equate to Tandem Masters boning their young tandem students??? I think it does. Start paying TMs what professors make and then we'll talk... Stupidity if left untreated is self-correcting If ya can't be good, look good, if that fails, make 'em laugh. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #93 July 19, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuote Which do you stand for? Do you support that profs should not be penalised for having sex with any of their current students, or are you against? Just posting this as he may have missed it. Does this equate to Tandem Masters boning their young tandem students??? At least at Al Gramondo's DZ it was a firing offense. He was clear that he was running a business, not a dating service. Blue skies, Winsor Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #94 July 19, 2010 QuoteQED Is that how you say; "Blah blah blah" in Latin? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,184 #95 July 19, 2010 Keep digging.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #96 July 19, 2010 QuoteJust playing your own game, by giving you a taste of your own medicine. Therefore you've got no room to complain, since it's your own tactic. The difference is that kallend is very open and honest about being a professor, so that makes this attack quite obvious. However, I haven't seen any posts in which you profess to be a teabagger. So, it is time to be open and honest about this. Are you a teabagger JR? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shah269 0 #97 July 19, 2010 Ok what if it's one of those old bag professors who hasn't had a hot beef injection since Bush Part I. And she hits on a studly stud such as me and hints at me being able to "bone" up my grade? Would I do it? Take one for the team? Life through good thoughts, good words, and good deeds is necessary to ensure happiness and to keep chaos at bay. The only thing that falls from the sky is birdshit and fools! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 3 #98 July 19, 2010 Quote Ok what if it's one of those old bag professors who hasn't had a hot beef injection since Bush Part I. And she hits on a studly stud such as me and hints at me being able to "bone" up my grade? Would I do it? Take one for the team? It can be reasonably anticipated that those in a position of power are going to be approached by people seeking to give them something of value, even if "in kind", in exchange for favorable treatment. The professional, whether it's a governmental official, a police officer or an educator, is supposed to say No, because to say Yes is simply corrupt. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #99 July 19, 2010 QuoteKeep digging. Ah yes, we all know how your ego won't allow you to NOT have the last word. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,611 #100 July 19, 2010 QuoteQuoteKeep digging. Ah yes, we all know how your ego won't allow you to NOT have the last word. You've got to wonder what's going through the head of a person who tags a comment on to the end of an argument with the sole purpose of accusing the other person of needing to have the last word. True genius.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites