Elena Kagan Demanded Sex Change Operation Benefit for Harvard Students

[skyrider 0]

Subject:
Elena Kagan demanded sex-change operation benefit for Harvard students.

To:
President Barack Obama
Sen. Jim Webb
Sen. Mark Warner

June 30, 2010

Breaking: Elena Kagan demanded sex-change operation benefit for Harvard students.

Kagan's team forced Blue-Cross, Blue-Shield to pay for sex-change operations as a benefit for students as Dean of Harvard Law.

Our breaking news report by Amy Contrada and Peter LaBarbera, just published this morning at MassResistance.org, contains links to 2006 and 2008 articles from the Harvard Crimson newspaper, proving Elena Kagan teamed up with the Lambda "Trans-gender Task Force" as Harvard Law Dean overseeing the administrative team that forced Blue-Cross, Blue-Shield to provide sex-change operations as a paid benefit, including breast enhancement or breast-removal (but not yet genital mutilation) for students or faculty who suffer from "gender identity disorder." The partial sex-change operations must be fully covered by insurance premiums, as Kagan's administrators demanded they be funded as an "equal right."

"Prior to the modification, Harvard subscribed to a standard plan from Blue Cross that specifically excluded 'services and supplies that are related to sex change surgery or to the reversal of a sex change,'" reported the Harvard Crimson.

But after Kagan's involvement, "the new policy states that 'gender reassignment surgery is one treatment option for Gender Identity Disorder, a condition in which a person feels a strong and persistent identification with the opposite gender accompanied by a strong sense of discomfort with their own gender.'...'Putting the insurance policy in line with Harvard's goals of equity and inclusion goes along with the non-discrimination statement,' says Eva B. Rosenberg [...], chair of Harvard Transgender Task Force.

This raises a question that must be asked by Senators: "Does Elena Kagan believe Obamacare is a Constitutional right, and does that include sex-change operations?"

Kagan also discussed allowing cross-dressing men to use ladies bathrooms at Harvard, after sympathetically hearing that demand by the Lambda community of homosexual students.

--"Bathrooms, locker rooms, or dorms can be chosen according to one's self-proclaimed 'gender identity.' Harvard College housing (now 'gender neutral') allows students to declare themselves 'transgender' or 'other' instead of male or female," (thanks partly to Kagan's pro-transgender leadership) the report reads.

--"Cross-dressing must be allowed without comment or reaction," at Harvard, thanks to Kagan, the report reads.

"A lot of people don't realize that using a bathroom or checking off gender on a form can be stressful to gender nonconforming people," Rosenberg told the Harvard Crimson in 2008. "Some of the discrimination that goes on is just unconscious or routine," lamented trans-genders at Harvard. IN OTHER WORDS, NORMAL PEOPLE DISCRIMINATE BY DEMANDING MEN USE THE MEN'S ROOM. But Kagan supported Lambda's efforts to make such "discrimination" illegal, as proven below...

The September 2008 Harvard Crimson reported Lambda had "begun conversations with the law school administration [i.e., Elena Kagan] to make our restrooms safe and accessible for people regardless of their gender identity or expression.

Kagan spoke several times at pro-homosexual banquets, and personally said 'I am committed to working with Lambda and others . . . on making progress for the elimination of discriminatory policies" not only in the military, but now apparently by any business that labels "Men" or "Women" on the ladies restroom (that's illegal discrimination?), and Blue-Cross, Blue-Shield, who had previously excluded sex-change operations. (That's illegal discrimination? Kagan believes yes, it is.)

Our alarming new report confirms how Elena Kagan will rule on laws like "E.N.D.A." which homosexual Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA) is trying to push through Congress, forcing all women and little girls nationwide to share public restrooms with cross-dressing men.

"For students and employees who have a medical need for the procedures that are now covered, it is an important increase in accessibility to surgeries that significantly improve one's quality of life and often are necessary for ensuring safety," wrote Sara Kimmel, a psychologist at UHS. [In other words, Kagan believes not having a sex-change is unsafe.]

Recognizing sex-change operations as a medical need was another reason for Kagan to demand Blue-Cross Blue-Shield remove the exclusion. "Many transgender people experience discomfort and depression because of the incongruence between body and mind, a sentiment that is becoming more widely accepted as constituting a medical need and a right to treatment," reported the Harvard Crimson. [Kagan sees paid sex-change operations as a "right" perhaps guaranteed by the Constitution.]

Let's get this straight. Kagan believes the best way to help gender-confused students is to make others pay their doctors to mutilate their bodies, so their bodies will match their confused minds. Sex-change operations are the new civil right, according to Kagan.

Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan attended Harvard's first Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Transgender alumni reunion dinner in September 2003, according to the Harvard Crimson newspaper that year, lending more proof to the original CBS news report that she will be the "first openly gay justice." Student reporters then described the event: "Celebratory at times, solemn at others, alumni and current students marked the anniversary Saturday with anecdotes about the personal challenges they faced, the battle they continue to fight to keep military recruiters off campus and the need for classroom instruction in legal issues pertaining to homosexuality." [HLS Holds Nation's First Ever GLBT Reunion, 9-22-03.]

In October 2003, Kagan appeared at a two-day conference held by Lambda, the Lesbian student group at the Law School. The Harvard Law Record reported: "much of what Kagan said was a recital of her personal abhorrence for the military discriminatory policy [Don't Ask, Don't Tell]. She said, 'I am committed to working with Lambda and others . . . on making progress for the elimination of ' discriminatory policies in the military." In September 2008, Kagan was a major participant at the 25th reunion of the Harvard Gay and Lesbian Caucus, titled "A Celebration of LGBT Life at Harvard," serving as moderator of a panel that included recent Obama appointee (and noted lesbian activist) Chai Feldblum.

Besides the fact the White House now deceives the public claiming Kagan's not Lesbian, Matt Barber of Liberty Counsel explains why it matters: "Kagan's 'sexual orientation' remains the pink elephant in the room: Can a sitting justice, potentially engaged in the homosexual lifestyle, be trusted to rule on cases that might well grant special preferred government status to some - including that very justice - while, at the same time, eliminating certain free-speech and religious-liberties rights enjoyed by others? (i.e., hate-crimes laws; the Employment Non-Discrimination Act; constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act; constitutionality of "don't ask don't tell," etc.)...whether or not Elena Kagan self-identifies as a lesbian, she has proven herself a radical anti-military, pro-homosexual ideologue and activist. There's little doubt that she would take this activism with her to the high court....it's my hope that a few Republican U.S. senators might take the time to introduce you to a nice fellow by the name of Phil A. Buster."

In a breaking news interview by Politico, Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan's former college roommate spoke on her behalf, to reveal that although Kagan (rarely) dated boys 30 years ago, Kagan today still refuses to personally and publicly deny reports by four Harvard students in 2006-2007 that she is currently a practicing homosexual Lesbian. Google queries for "Elena Kagan husband" and "Elena Kagan personal life" ranked in the top 10, showing we have created serious internet buzz that is forcing the Obama Administration to re-think their secrecy about Kagan's sexual orientation.

"The rumors that Kagan is gay," her former college roommate Sarah Walzer said, "were current before she became a public figure, and a source of frustration to Kagan and her friends - who were frustrated by their persistence, but worried that denying them could imply some anti-gay prejudice." What? Read that again, slowly.

In other words, Kagan believes anyone who claims to be heterosexual is prejudice and anti-gay, (including you and me), just by stating they are not gay, so in order to not offend gays, Kagan will not publicly or personally claim she is heterosexual, nor refute the observations of Harvard Students who observed her with her female lover on campus. In fact, Walzer here admits Kagan has intentionally rejected heterosexual labels for years, remaining "in the closet" even today, for fear of offending homosexuals.

Instead of speaking for herself, Kagan sends out a far-past roommate spokesman who only adds confusion to the mystery, to paraphrase Kagan's private admission to Walzer: "I reject heterosexual labels to avoid offending homosexuals." Is this the kind of crazy-thinking we need ruling on the Supreme Court?

As far back as 2006 and 2007, four different Harvard Law Students confirmed that Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan was Lesbian. Why now is the Obama Administration ashamed to admit her homosexual orientation? Why stay "in the closet" to the American public, when Kagan is openly-gay among her friends?

In January 2006, The Harvard Law Review Epinions openly advertised Kagan's Lesbian qualifications as a reason to attract new students
http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/userletter/?id=3181&letter_id=5446052821

[billvon 3,132]

> Elena Kagan Demanded Sec Change Operation Benefit for Harvard Students

Good. She talked Blue Cross into covering a procedure covered that benefited her students. Kudos to her.

[Andy9o8 3]

She's a smart, Jewish, liberal, Clinton-loving, redneck-scorning, Commie-wannabe lesbian. And she wants to take away all your bikes.

MUHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!

[ChangoLanzao 0]

Quote

"I reject heterosexual labels to avoid offending homosexuals." Is this the kind of crazy-thinking we need ruling on the Supreme Court?

Yeppers!

[Amazon 7]

Quote

She's a smart, Jewish, liberal, Clinton-loving, redneck-scorning, Commie-wannabe lesbian. And she wants to take away all your bikes.

MUHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!

DUUUUUDE I am glad the Starbucks is free around here....

[kelpdiver 2]

this sort of news item is good for riling up the faithful, but it's going to have no impact on the process.

[DFWAJG 4]

First of all, (not first off), People with gender identity disorder are not "gay" necessarily. They are people who simply identify with the opposite sex. And this begins very very early in life, usually at 3 or 4 years old.

Secondly, Medicaid and Medicare cover gender reassignment surgery. Many "T's" wait until they qualify for Medicare to have the surgery done. Sadly, they live half their lives having been tortured living in the wrong body.

Good for her for recognizing that this is a treatable condition that should be covered.

[turtlespeed 226]

Quote

Subject:
Elena Kagan demanded sex-change operation benefit for Harvard students.

To:
President Barack Obama
Sen. Jim Webb
Sen. Mark Warner

June 30, 2010

Breaking: Elena Kagan demanded sex-change operation benefit for Harvard students.

Kagan's team forced Blue-Cross, Blue-Shield to pay for sex-change operations as a benefit for students as Dean of Harvard Law.

Our breaking news report by Amy Contrada and Peter LaBarbera, just published this morning at MassResistance.org, contains links to 2006 and 2008 articles from the Harvard Crimson newspaper, proving Elena Kagan teamed up with the Lambda "Trans-gender Task Force" as Harvard Law Dean overseeing the administrative team that forced Blue-Cross, Blue-Shield to provide sex-change operations as a paid benefit, including breast enhancement or breast-removal (but not yet genital mutilation) for students or faculty who suffer from "gender identity disorder." The partial sex-change operations must be fully covered by insurance premiums, as Kagan's administrators demanded they be funded as an "equal right."

"Prior to the modification, Harvard subscribed to a standard plan from Blue Cross that specifically excluded 'services and supplies that are related to sex change surgery or to the reversal of a sex change,'" reported the Harvard Crimson.

But after Kagan's involvement, "the new policy states that 'gender reassignment surgery is one treatment option for Gender Identity Disorder, a condition in which a person feels a strong and persistent identification with the opposite gender accompanied by a strong sense of discomfort with their own gender.'...'Putting the insurance policy in line with Harvard's goals of equity and inclusion goes along with the non-discrimination statement,' says Eva B. Rosenberg [...], chair of Harvard Transgender Task Force.

This raises a question that must be asked by Senators: "Does Elena Kagan believe Obamacare is a Constitutional right, and does that include sex-change operations?"

Kagan also discussed allowing cross-dressing men to use ladies bathrooms at Harvard, after sympathetically hearing that demand by the Lambda community of homosexual students.

--"Bathrooms, locker rooms, or dorms can be chosen according to one's self-proclaimed 'gender identity.' Harvard College housing (now 'gender neutral') allows students to declare themselves 'transgender' or 'other' instead of male or female," (thanks partly to Kagan's pro-transgender leadership) the report reads.

--"Cross-dressing must be allowed without comment or reaction," at Harvard, thanks to Kagan, the report reads.

"A lot of people don't realize that using a bathroom or checking off gender on a form can be stressful to gender nonconforming people," Rosenberg told the Harvard Crimson in 2008. "Some of the discrimination that goes on is just unconscious or routine," lamented trans-genders at Harvard. IN OTHER WORDS, NORMAL PEOPLE DISCRIMINATE BY DEMANDING MEN USE THE MEN'S ROOM. But Kagan supported Lambda's efforts to make such "discrimination" illegal, as proven below...

The September 2008 Harvard Crimson reported Lambda had "begun conversations with the law school administration [i.e., Elena Kagan] to make our restrooms safe and accessible for people regardless of their gender identity or expression.

Kagan spoke several times at pro-homosexual banquets, and personally said 'I am committed to working with Lambda and others . . . on making progress for the elimination of discriminatory policies" not only in the military, but now apparently by any business that labels "Men" or "Women" on the ladies restroom (that's illegal discrimination?), and Blue-Cross, Blue-Shield, who had previously excluded sex-change operations. (That's illegal discrimination? Kagan believes yes, it is.)

Our alarming new report confirms how Elena Kagan will rule on laws like "E.N.D.A." which homosexual Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA) is trying to push through Congress, forcing all women and little girls nationwide to share public restrooms with cross-dressing men.

"For students and employees who have a medical need for the procedures that are now covered, it is an important increase in accessibility to surgeries that significantly improve one's quality of life and often are necessary for ensuring safety," wrote Sara Kimmel, a psychologist at UHS. [In other words, Kagan believes not having a sex-change is unsafe.]

Recognizing sex-change operations as a medical need was another reason for Kagan to demand Blue-Cross Blue-Shield remove the exclusion. "Many transgender people experience discomfort and depression because of the incongruence between body and mind, a sentiment that is becoming more widely accepted as constituting a medical need and a right to treatment," reported the Harvard Crimson. [Kagan sees paid sex-change operations as a "right" perhaps guaranteed by the Constitution.]

Let's get this straight. Kagan believes the best way to help gender-confused students is to make others pay their doctors to mutilate their bodies, so their bodies will match their confused minds. Sex-change operations are the new civil right, according to Kagan.

Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan attended Harvard's first Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Transgender alumni reunion dinner in September 2003, according to the Harvard Crimson newspaper that year, lending more proof to the original CBS news report that she will be the "first openly gay justice." Student reporters then described the event: "Celebratory at times, solemn at others, alumni and current students marked the anniversary Saturday with anecdotes about the personal challenges they faced, the battle they continue to fight to keep military recruiters off campus and the need for classroom instruction in legal issues pertaining to homosexuality." [HLS Holds Nation's First Ever GLBT Reunion, 9-22-03.]

In October 2003, Kagan appeared at a two-day conference held by Lambda, the Lesbian student group at the Law School. The Harvard Law Record reported: "much of what Kagan said was a recital of her personal abhorrence for the military discriminatory policy [Don't Ask, Don't Tell]. She said, 'I am committed to working with Lambda and others . . . on making progress for the elimination of ' discriminatory policies in the military." In September 2008, Kagan was a major participant at the 25th reunion of the Harvard Gay and Lesbian Caucus, titled "A Celebration of LGBT Life at Harvard," serving as moderator of a panel that included recent Obama appointee (and noted lesbian activist) Chai Feldblum.

Besides the fact the White House now deceives the public claiming Kagan's not Lesbian, Matt Barber of Liberty Counsel explains why it matters: "Kagan's 'sexual orientation' remains the pink elephant in the room: Can a sitting justice, potentially engaged in the homosexual lifestyle, be trusted to rule on cases that might well grant special preferred government status to some - including that very justice - while, at the same time, eliminating certain free-speech and religious-liberties rights enjoyed by others? (i.e., hate-crimes laws; the Employment Non-Discrimination Act; constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act; constitutionality of "don't ask don't tell," etc.)...whether or not Elena Kagan self-identifies as a lesbian, she has proven herself a radical anti-military, pro-homosexual ideologue and activist. There's little doubt that she would take this activism with her to the high court....it's my hope that a few Republican U.S. senators might take the time to introduce you to a nice fellow by the name of Phil A. Buster."

In a breaking news interview by Politico, Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan's former college roommate spoke on her behalf, to reveal that although Kagan (rarely) dated boys 30 years ago, Kagan today still refuses to personally and publicly deny reports by four Harvard students in 2006-2007 that she is currently a practicing homosexual Lesbian. Google queries for "Elena Kagan husband" and "Elena Kagan personal life" ranked in the top 10, showing we have created serious internet buzz that is forcing the Obama Administration to re-think their secrecy about Kagan's sexual orientation.

"The rumors that Kagan is gay," her former college roommate Sarah Walzer said, "were current before she became a public figure, and a source of frustration to Kagan and her friends - who were frustrated by their persistence, but worried that denying them could imply some anti-gay prejudice." What? Read that again, slowly.

In other words, Kagan believes anyone who claims to be heterosexual is prejudice and anti-gay, (including you and me), just by stating they are not gay, so in order to not offend gays, Kagan will not publicly or personally claim she is heterosexual, nor refute the observations of Harvard Students who observed her with her female lover on campus. In fact, Walzer here admits Kagan has intentionally rejected heterosexual labels for years, remaining "in the closet" even today, for fear of offending homosexuals.

Instead of speaking for herself, Kagan sends out a far-past roommate spokesman who only adds confusion to the mystery, to paraphrase Kagan's private admission to Walzer: "I reject heterosexual labels to avoid offending homosexuals." Is this the kind of crazy-thinking we need ruling on the Supreme Court?

As far back as 2006 and 2007, four different Harvard Law Students confirmed that Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan was Lesbian. Why now is the Obama Administration ashamed to admit her homosexual orientation? Why stay "in the closet" to the American public, when Kagan is openly-gay among her friends?

In January 2006, The Harvard Law Review Epinions openly advertised Kagan's Lesbian qualifications as a reason to attract new students
http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/userletter/?id=3181&letter_id=5446052821

This is a procedure that should be comletely and totally elective. It should not impact the fees that I have to pay.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[rehmwa 2]

Quote

> Elena Kagan Demanded Sec Change Operation Benefit for Harvard Students

Good. She talked Blue Cross into covering a procedure covered that benefited her students. Kudos to her.

would you also agree had she advocated breast augmentation? nose jobs?

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

[Andy9o8 3]

Quote

Quote

> Elena Kagan Demanded Sec Change Operation Benefit for Harvard Students

Good. She talked Blue Cross into covering a procedure covered that benefited her students. Kudos to her.

would you also agree had she advocated breast augmentation? nose jobs?

Considering the salutary benefit of those procedures to both the female and male populations? You betcha!

[rehmwa 2]

Quote

Quote

Quote

> Elena Kagan Demanded Sec Change Operation Benefit for Harvard Students

Good. She talked Blue Cross into covering a procedure covered that benefited her students. Kudos to her.

would you also agree had she advocated breast augmentation? nose jobs?

Considering the salutary benefit of those procedures to both the female and male populations? You betcha!

those are pretty big words for me, but a more attractive world is a happier world...

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

[billvon 3,132]

>would you also agree had she advocated breast augmentation? nose jobs?

If needed to correct a medically recognized defect - yes. If for purely aesthetic considerations - no.

[rehmwa 2]

Quote

>If needed to correct a medically recognized defect

you mean like "not perky enough" or "smaller than Shah likes"?

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

[billvon 3,132]

>you mean like "not perky enough"

Naah. Perkiness is in the eye of the beholder, and the pro-saggy contingent would get offended if this became a medically recognized condition.

>or "smaller than Shah likes"?

That's more like it. Think of the lifelong trauma a woman will endure having to live with breasts smaller than Shah prefers. I mean, how would she make it through the day?

[Remster 30]

Quote

Quote

Quote

> Elena Kagan Demanded Sec Change Operation Benefit for Harvard Students

Good. She talked Blue Cross into covering a procedure covered that benefited her students. Kudos to her.

would you also agree had she advocated breast augmentation? nose jobs?

Considering the salutary benefit of those procedures to both the female and male populations? You betcha!

I decree that from this day forth, all SC denizens shall add a "" whenever they type "You betcha!".

Remster

[rehmwa 2]

Quote

>Think of the lifelong trauma a woman will endure having to live with breasts smaller than Shah prefers. I mean, how would she make it through the day?

I suspect she'd get through the day with less back pain.

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

[tkhayes 348]

who gives a shit....?

[wmw999 2,603]

Didn't it used to be Sudsy who was just about as vocal about liking them big, and on a skinny body?

Wendy P.

There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

[hwt 0]

Quote

> Elena Kagan Demanded Sec Change Operation Benefit for Harvard Students

Good. She talked Blue Cross into covering a procedure covered that benefited her students. Kudos to her.

_________________________________________
how does cutting off a guy's pecker benefit him?
and why should everyone have to pay for this?
This should be considered elective surgery.

[Remster 30]

Quote

Didn't it used to be Sudsy who was just about as vocal about liking them big, and on a skinny body?

Wendy P.

The times,

They are a-changing....

Remster

[billvon 3,132]

>how does cutting off a guy's pecker benefit him?

It's not "cutting off a guy's pecker." Men and women have all the same parts; they're just different sizes. Sexual reassignment surgery moves the various parts around to reconstruct the genitalia.

To answer the second part of the question, it helps them the same way that plastic surgery to correct ambiguous genitalia resulting from congenital adrenal hyperplasia helps.

>and why should everyone have to pay for this?

They don't. You can choose any insurance company you like, including ones that do not cover such procedures.

>This should be considered elective surgery.

Uh, OK. And many plans cover elective surgery (like cataract surgery or angioplasty.) Again, if you don't like that, get a plan that doesn't cover any of that.

[CanuckInUSA 0]

You must be a student of Harvard in order to get your free sex change? WTF ... I guess elitist Liberals who are already filthy rich feel that they and only they are entitled to their entitlements. If Elena Kagan wasn't such an elitists she would be lobbying her pal Barak Obama to force all healthcare providers to give free sex change operations, not just those who have the money to attend an elitist Ivy League school such as Harvard.

Sounds like a case of discrimination here.

Too funny when Liberals are caught discriminating.

Try not to worry about the things you have no control over

[billvon 3,132]

>You must be a student of Harvard in order to get your free sex change?

Or Stanford, or Penn State. Or work for Goldman-Sachs, or Bank of America, or Wachovia. Or just get private insurance that covers the procedure.

>I guess elitist Liberals who are already filthy rich feel that they and only
>they are entitled to their entitlements.

Next time you're in a BofA branch, tell the teller you are disgusted by how her and her filthy rich teller friends chose an elitist job just to screw you over.

[CanuckInUSA 0]

Quote

Next time you're in a BofA branch, tell the teller you are blah blah blah blah blah

Not going to happen. You see there are no Bank of America's where I live and even if there was, it's been years since I felt I needed to talk to a teller while banking. Plus where did you get this idea that I felt that Bank of America employees were screwing me over in a thread that had absolutely nothing to do with this organization? I thought moderators were supposed to prevent crap being thrown around in threads. I never knew moderators actually felt they had the right to throw their own wild accusations around about others. Have a good day Bill (ban me if you must for calling you out) ... and yes Ms Kagan is discriminating against all those who do not have the means to attend such an elitist Ivy League school such as Harvard.

Try not to worry about the things you have no control over

[billvon 3,132]

>Plus where did you get this idea that I felt that Bank of America
>employees were screwing me over in a thread that had absolutely nothing
>to do with this organization?

Your rant about how the "rich elitist liberals" that get SRS coverage are "discriminating" was the first clue.

> I thought moderators were supposed to prevent crap being thrown
>around in threads.

No, feel free to throw as much crap as you like. There's no rule against posting crap here; happens all the time.

>and yes Ms Kagan is discriminating against all those who do not have the
>means to attend such an elitist Ivy League school such as Harvard.

And, apparently, evil rich liberal elitist schools like . . . Penn State.