Kagan 2, Congress 0

[rushmc 23]

Quote

Quote

I would have thought "sad", myself.

Well you go right ahead and be as "sad" as you wish.... remember now... I am not laughing with you

You never are......

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[winsor 236]

Quote

Quote

Quote

RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT


More often then not.. its more stalkerish then that

Really? Just in this thread: posting about the comparison between the experience of Kagan and other justices. DaVinci mentioned how the Libs were up in arms about the experience of Miers. YOU then made it about Kagan's supposed sexual orientation and then claimed you were attacked.

Looks like that proves MY point about you starting it most of the time, than your victim scenario.

I can continue, if you like.

By all means.. this is funny to watch.... and I am bored

I think "sorry" is more accurate.

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT


More often then not.. its more stalkerish then that

Really? Just in this thread: posting about the comparison between the experience of Kagan and other justices. DaVinci mentioned how the Libs were up in arms about the experience of Miers. YOU then made it about Kagan's supposed sexual orientation and then claimed you were attacked.

Looks like that proves MY point about you starting it most of the time, than your victim scenario.

I can continue, if you like.

By all means.. this is funny to watch.... and I am bored

I think "sorry" is more accurate.

AWWWW isnt that cute... Winsor is "TRYING so hard" to play the player...and make a nice little pa

YALL crack me up BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Heres laffin at yall agin and agin

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Ok, I say seat her now. She's already proved she can handle herself well and with humor in spite of stupidity staring her in the face.

http://www.popeater.com/2010/06/30/elena-kagan-twilight-video-jacob-edward/

So.. lets throw a THREAD DRIFT INDICATOR and see how many more FRINGERS come out to play the player instead..



Back on point...

SURPRISE SURPRISE SURPRISE from the PARTY OF NO

Quote

Sen. Cornyn to oppose Kagan for Supreme Court
Posted: Jul 14, 2010 3:19 PM PDT


Sen. John Cornyn
WASHINGTON (AP) - Sen. John Cornyn says he'll oppose Elena Kagan's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Texas Republican says he's not sure Kagan has the proper understanding of the role of a judge.

Cornyn announced his decision to reporters on Wednesday. He says judges should strictly interpret the written U.S. Constitution and that Kagan, in her Senate testimony, didn't rule out overturning recent Supreme Court decisions. Cornyn says her testimony makes him concerned that Kagan won't work within the Constitutional limits of a judge's power.

Cornyn heads the Senate Republicans' campaign arm and sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, and he never seemed likely to support Kagan. He says her lack of experience as a judge is also a factor in his decision.

Kagan is currently the U.S. solicitor general and previously served as dean of Harvard Law School.

AS if there is a SINGLE rePUBIClown who will vote for Ms Kagan or for anthing else either

[DaVinci 0]

Quote

IRONY Score off the scale...

Yes, if you READ those exchanges, you see you throwing insults more than anyone else.

The only irony here, is you bitching about people who throw insults.

But, let the readers decide.

The example of this thread is perfect...

Your first post to the thread:

Quote

No Bible to thump on and is not bought and paid for by the clowns that bought Reagan and Bush to appoint the ass clowns they did.( AND they made out like MAJOR MOFO's in 8 years of Bush the Second Administration that they handed to him)

My first post to the thread:

Quote

My only issues are her lack of judicial exp.

I had the same issue with Myers, but this time it seems not to be an issue?

And how she refuses to take positions when asked questions. Understandable, but add the two and it leaves us with no real gauge on her positions.

In the end is it a big deal? Nah, she is replacing a liberal and even if she is strongly liberal, nothing will change. Also there is ZERO chance Obama would nominate a Con.....

Now class....
1. Which is inflammatory?
2. Which uses name calling?

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Quote

IRONY Score off the scale...

Yes, if you READ those exchanges, you see you throwing insults more than anyone else.

The only irony here, is you bitching about people who throw insults.

But, let the readers decide.

The example of this thread is perfect...

Your first post to the thread:

Quote

No Bible to thump on and is not bought and paid for by the clowns that bought Reagan and Bush to appoint the ass clowns they did.( AND they made out like MAJOR MOFO's in 8 years of Bush the Second Administration that they handed to him)

My first post to the thread:

Quote

My only issues are her lack of judicial exp.

I had the same issue with Myers, but this time it seems not to be an issue?

And how she refuses to take positions when asked questions. Understandable, but add the two and it leaves us with no real gauge on her positions.

In the end is it a big deal? Nah, she is replacing a liberal and even if she is strongly liberal, nothing will change. Also there is ZERO chance Obama would nominate a Con.....

Now class....
1. Which is inflammatory?
2. Which uses name calling?

Naughty BOY.. still playing the player.... TSK TSK


Back to the thread..

Harriet Miers

From WIKI

Quote

In 1979, after she made partner in her law firm, she became an evangelical Christian after having had a series of long discussions with Nathan Hecht, her close friend and colleague at the firm

THUMP THUMP THUMP

MS Miers just another "Friend of Bush" based on her religion... OBVIOUSLY deserved to be on the SC based on that qualification alone

[DaVinci 0]

Quote

Naughty BOY.. still playing the player.... TSK TSK

No, responding to your BS claims of irony.

Quote

MS Miers just another "Friend of Bush" based on her religion... OBVIOUSLY deserved to be on the SC based on that qualification alone

Show where I said that?

What I DID say is that if a guy like me claims that he does not like Kagan based off of NO Judicial exp.... You make some claim that I have some other issue.

But folks like you held the SAME position on Miers.

Me pointing out the double standard may not feel comfortable to you, but there is one on this issue.

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Quote

Naughty BOY.. still playing the player.... TSK TSK

No, responding to your BS claims of irony.

Quote

MS Miers just another "Friend of Bush" based on her religion... OBVIOUSLY deserved to be on the SC based on that qualification alone

Show where I said that?

What I DID say is that if a guy like me claims that he does not like Kagan based off of NO Judicial exp.... You make some claim that I have some other issue.

But folks like you held the SAME position on Miers.

Me pointing out the double standard may not feel comfortable to you, but there is one on this issue.

BUT FOLKS like you would have LOVED to see ole Harriet on the SC.. with even far less REAL qualifications..... Helll I guess you think just bein a Texican was enough

[DaVinci 0]

Quote

BUT FOLKS like you would have LOVED to see ole Harriet on the SC.. with even far less REAL qualifications..... Helll I guess you think just bein a Texican was enough

Got something to back that statement up? Or just trying to play the player with no basis and no data to back up your position.

Now just to bust your little bubble... maybe you should read my first post to this thread again.... Pay close attention to the 2nd sentence.

In other words.... You are wrong again.

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Quote

BUT FOLKS like you would have LOVED to see ole Harriet on the SC.. with even far less REAL qualifications..... Helll I guess you think just bein a Texican was enough

Got something to back that statement up? Or just trying to play the player with no basis and no data to back up your position.

Now just to bust your little bubble... maybe you should read my first post to this thread again.... Pay close attention to the 2nd sentence.

In other words.... You are wrong again.

Oh come on now.. don't get all butt hurt over her NOT answering pedantic childishly stupid leading questions..... did you see the performance of Bush Appointees?

Oh .. that was OK because The Texican Decider Extraordinaire appointed them...

[DaVinci 0]

Quote

Oh come on now.. don't get all butt hurt over her NOT answering pedantic childishly stupid leading questions..... did you see the performance of Bush Appointees?

Again, you refuse to use more than childish antics. You did read my first post, second sentence again right? (Personally, I doubt you read it ever since it does not fit into your rants).

But here is is again so you can't say I didn't try to help you out.

" My only issues are her lack of judicial exp.

I had the same issue with Myers, but this time it seems not to be an issue? "

You may continue to avoid using anything but personal attacks.... It seems that is all you do. But the data is out there for everyone else to read.

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Quote

Oh come on now.. don't get all butt hurt over her NOT answering pedantic childishly stupid leading questions..... did you see the performance of Bush Appointees?

Again, you refuse to use more than childish antics. You did read my first post, second sentence again right? (Personally, I doubt you read it ever since it does not fit into your rants).

But here is is again so you can't say I didn't try to help you out.

" My only issues are her lack of judicial exp.

I had the same issue with Myers, but this time it seems not to be an issue? "

You may continue to avoid using anything but personal attacks.... It seems that is all you do. But the data is out there for everyone else to read.

And there is plenty of Cheeze Whiz out there to go with that

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

Oh come on now.. don't get all butt hurt over her NOT answering pedantic childishly stupid leading questions.....

You mean the vague answers that she so decried *before* she was a SC pick?

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[DaVinci 0]

Quote

And there is plenty of Cheeze Whiz out there to go with that

Got it... you are unable to discuss the issue based on facts and can only resort to theatrics and name calling.

In other words, your position is more heat than light.

Is there a way to block posters who's signal to noise ratio is out of whack?

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Quote

And there is plenty of Cheeze Whiz out there to go with that

Got it... you are unable to discuss the issue based on facts and can only resort to theatrics and name calling.

In other words, your position is more heat than light.

Is there a way to block posters who's signal to noise ratio is out of whack?

AWWW how cute more playing the player

I tried that but those on the FAR FRINGE right around here can't seem to stay on message.... We really need John to come throw a THREAD DRIFT INDICATOR

[DaVinci 0]

Quote

AWWW how cute more playing the player

Talking about yourself?

Quote

And there is plenty of Cheeze Whiz out there to go with that

I have asked several times for you to debate the ISSUE... You have REFUSED and came back with PA's.

Quote

I tried that but those on the FAR FRINGE right around here can't seem to stay on message....

Again, the FIRST reply to me by YOU was off topic and personal. I have asked you to play the ball, you have refused to even try.

I have even pointed out my position that you ignored when you just made up a position for me.... I even quoted it, you just ignored it again.

Again.... anyone know how to block an individual? I don't mind, and in fact LIKE, opposing view points. I just don't care to read insulting babel without any point and not based in fact.

Your posts are more heat than light.

[Amazon 7]

DRIFTING WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY to the RIGHT yet again.......

Back to ASSCLOWNS

that the fringe right seems to love so much

From Wiki

President Bush said that Thomas was the "best qualified [nominee] at this time."[41] The American Bar Association's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary rated Thomas "qualified" by a vote of 13 to 2.[48] Reagan nominee Robert Bork received twice as many "not qualified" votes as Thomas.[49] However, the ABA rating of Thomas was the least favorable of any confirmed Supreme Court nominee dating back to the Eisenhower administration (most nominees receive unanimous "well qualified" evaluations).[48] Thomas had never argued a case in the high courts, though others have also been appointed without Supreme Court oral argument experience,[50] and prior to Thomas, forty Supreme Court justices had been appointed without any prior judicial service (though none have since).[51] Thomas had never written a legal book, article, or brief of consequence, and had been a judge for only a year.[50]

I wonder how the 2000 election would have gone without so many REPUBLICAN appointed SC judges.

I bet this would be a far different country without them

[DaVinci 0]

Quote

DRIFTING WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY to the RIGHT yet again.......

More heat than light AGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIN.

Quote

I wonder how the 2000 election would have gone without so many REPUBLICAN appointed SC judges

I am sure you have a point other than just complaining about how the process works?

See a President gets to nominate a justice. The Senate gets to vote on that Justice. Then the Justice is supposed to rule based on law. So one branch, nominates, one branch votes.

That is how our three branch system works.

You can complain about it..... But it also goes both ways.

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Quote

DRIFTING WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY to the RIGHT yet again.......

More heat than light AGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIN.

Quote

I wonder how the 2000 election would have gone without so many REPUBLICAN appointed SC judges

I am sure you have a point other than just complaining about how the process works?

See a President gets to nominate a justice. The Senate gets to vote on that Justice. Then the Justice is supposed to rule based on law. So one branch, nominates, one branch votes.

That is how our three branch system works.

You can complain about it..... But it also goes both ways.

The fact that all 3 branches of government were in the dirty little grubby hands of the rePUBIClown VOODOODOOERS for a number of years..... is reflected in the current state of our economy.. WELL FUCKING DONE

Yeah.. Clarence "Spankin it" Thomas has been such a shining example of right wing thought

It does seem the right wing has a short short memory.... well lots of short lots of things, but we will not get into that right now.

[kelpdiver 2]

Quote

The fact that all 3 branches of government were in the dirty little grubby hands of the rePUBIClown VOODOODOOERS for a number of years..... is reflected in the current state of our economy.. WELL FUCKING DONE

Yeah.. Clarence "Spankin it" Thomas has been such a shining example of right wing thought

I can't think of how the Supreme Court has impacted the economy.

And regardless of how one feels about them shutting down the Florida recount, Bush did win the state. Every count done in the months after confirmed it, so at most the process would have been drawn out.

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Quote

The fact that all 3 branches of government were in the dirty little grubby hands of the rePUBIClown VOODOODOOERS for a number of years..... is reflected in the current state of our economy.. WELL FUCKING DONE

Yeah.. Clarence "Spankin it" Thomas has been such a shining example of right wing thought

I can't think of how the Supreme Court has impacted the economy.

And regardless of how one feels about them shutting down the Florida recount, Bush did win the state. Every count done in the months after confirmed it, so at most the process would have been drawn out.

From Wiki..and VERY prophetic..

Quote

In his dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer wrote "We do risk a self-inflicted wound - a wound that may harm not just the court, but the nation." Morton Horwitz comments that Justice Breyer "chose those words - self-inflicted wound - precisely. They were used by Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes in 1928 to describe the damage the court had done itself and the country when it ruled in the 1857 Dred Scott case that black people could not be US citizens."[54] Bill Clinton, who was President of the United States when the decision was made, wrote in his autobiography My Life:

If Gore had been ahead in the vote count and Bush behind, there's not a doubt in my mind that the same Supreme Court would have voted 9 to 0 to [re]count the vote and I would have supported the decision... Bush v. Gore will go down in history as one of the worst decisions the Supreme Court ever made, along with the Dred Scott case.[55]

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

Quote

Bill Clinton, who was President of the United States when the decision was made, wrote in his autobiography My Life:

If Gore had been ahead in the vote count and Bush behind, there's not a doubt in my mind that the same Supreme Court would have voted 9 to 0 to [re]count the vote and I would have supported the decision... Bush v. Gore will go down in history as one of the worst decisions the Supreme Court ever made, along with the Dred Scott case.[55]

Bubba Jeff thinking it was a bad call by the SC...what a surprise.

In point of FACT (and not wishful thinking), the Supremes very well might have gone along with a recount had it been a fair one - i.e., the entire state and not just certain, heavily Democratic counties.

Of course, history already shows the result of a full recount - Bush won the state.

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Bill Clinton, who was President of the United States when the decision was made, wrote in his autobiography My Life:

If Gore had been ahead in the vote count and Bush behind, there's not a doubt in my mind that the same Supreme Court would have voted 9 to 0 to [re]count the vote and I would have supported the decision... Bush v. Gore will go down in history as one of the worst decisions the Supreme Court ever made, along with the Dred Scott case.[55]

Bubba Jeff thinking it was a bad call by the SC...what a surprise.

In point of FACT (and not wishful thinking), the Supremes very well might have gone along with a recount had it been a fair one - i.e., the entire state and not just certain, heavily Democratic counties.

Of course, history already shows the result of a full recount - Bush won the state.

Wishful thinking .. yet again.

I bet you really believe the country is better off ... but your hero's resume is replete with his prowess at running businesses into the ground.. and you voted him into office.. and expected different.

Brilliant

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Bill Clinton, who was President of the United States when the decision was made, wrote in his autobiography My Life:

If Gore had been ahead in the vote count and Bush behind, there's not a doubt in my mind that the same Supreme Court would have voted 9 to 0 to [re]count the vote and I would have supported the decision... Bush v. Gore will go down in history as one of the worst decisions the Supreme Court ever made, along with the Dred Scott case.[55]

Bubba Jeff thinking it was a bad call by the SC...what a surprise.

In point of FACT (and not wishful thinking), the Supremes very well might have gone along with a recount had it been a fair one - i.e., the entire state and not just certain, heavily Democratic counties.

Of course, history already shows the result of a full recount - Bush won the state.

Wishful thinking .. yet again.

I bet you really believe the country is better off ... but your hero's resume is replete with his prowess at running businesses into the ground.. and you voted him into office.. and expected different.

Brilliant

Ah, yes - when you can't argue the point, change the subject. Nice try.

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[Amazon 7]

It is a point of fact thta it was impossible to have anything approaching a FAIR elecion in that state at that time. With the electronic voting manufacturer promising Bush the election to the right wing goon squads that showed up in Dade county and the lack of voting machines in "ethnic" precincts... to the Govenor...and the Lady with the Big Hair....in Tallehassle.. it was nearly impossible.. and our COUNTRY has paid for it.