All You "Anti" Gun Nuts!

[DaVinci 0]

Quote

I could care less what it was designed for, personally. It's amazing that people assume the right to limit guns using the "saving lives" premise. In the meantime, denying others the right to own and use them as they see fit, harming nobody.

The crimes committed with guns are already crimes. In most cases, they can be committed with knives, hammers, or or other household implements.

Bravo.....

What amazes me is that people that are for gay rights, legalization of Pot...basically for individual rights suddenly are against individual rights as soon as the topic is guns.

[DaVinci 0]

Quote

Many of them feel that their own government will fear them and so they will be protected from Tyranny if every citizen is allowed to own and carry guns.

Close.... But not quite.

And only on one part of the argument.

[DaVinci 0]

Quote

Yup. It's a famous PHONY quote.

Prove it

[ChangoLanzao 0]

Quote

Quote

Yup. It's a famous PHONY quote.

Prove it

Quote him.

[billvon 3,133]

>But that does not make a car designed 'solely' to kill.

In fact, it was designed NOT to kill - which makes it very, very different than a gun.

[DaVinci 0]

Quote

Quote him.

Ah, so you don't even know the quote, yet claim it is phony..... Got it.

[kelpdiver 2]

Quote

Quote

Quote him.

Ah, so you don't even know the quote, yet claim it is phony..... Got it.

well, it's our forum's newest form of CDIF or BDIF.

[DaVinci 0]

Quote

well, it's our forum's newest form of CDIF or BDIF.

I don't follow? Can you explain?

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

>but one of the posters was saying handgun soel purpose when they
>were designed was to kill humans...so they should be banned . . .

No, he didn't.

So, what does "they are designed solely to kill people" mean to YOU, Bill? It obviously is something different than it means to the rest of us English-speakers.

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

Quote

well, it's our forum's newest form of CDIF or BDIF.

I don't follow? Can you explain?

Clinton / Bush Did It First

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[kelpdiver 2]

Quote

Quote

>but one of the posters was saying handgun soel purpose when they
>were designed was to kill humans...so they should be banned . . .

No, he didn't.

So, what does "they are designed solely to kill people" mean to YOU, Bill? It obviously is something different than it means to the rest of us English-speakers.

The poster did not make the second statement - "so they should be banned."

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

The poster did not make the second statement - "so they should be banned."

True, he didn't. My apologies to Bill for the misunderstanding.

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[billvon 3,133]

>So, what does "they are designed solely to kill people" mean to YOU, Bill?

It means that that was the only design goal when designing them.

>It obviously is something different than it means to the rest of us
>English-speakers.

Sorry, I'm not a gun nut or a gun-grabber, so I don't feel the panic you do when you read stuff like that.

[rhaig 0]

Quote

Bullshit.

Waking up in darkest night as police is chasing some suspect crossing my garden will tell me nothing "clear" in the first moments.

if I were looking out my back window at 3am and saw one man climb over my fence, run across my yard, followed shortly by another, to me, neither one would be the bad guy. They are not infringing on any of my rights aside from maybe trampling a plant or 3. Who cares, that's just stuff.

***
You will need a bit more time to decide. Or you just decide to shoot first and ask later?

you're assuming a gun in hand turns one into a trigger happy cowboy incapable of rational thought. Didn't happen in any of the CHL states here when those laws were passed.

--
Rob

[billvon 3,133]

>>i've held a magnum, but my penis got NO bigger!

>Only people like you think they do that.

Apparently not! From another thread here:

"My pecker just moved thinking about firing an M16 again."

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

[Amazon 7]

Quote

>>i've held a magnum, but my penis got NO bigger!

>Only people like you think they do that.

Apparently not! From another thread here:

"My pecker just moved thinking about firing an M16 again."

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

>So, what does "they are designed solely to kill people" mean to YOU, Bill?

It means that that was the only design goal when designing them.

Really? So, you have copies of patent records where the stated purpose is to kill people? Got cites for that?

>It obviously is something different than it means to the rest of us
>English-speakers.

Sorry, I'm not a gun nut or a gun-grabber, so I don't feel the panic you do when you read stuff like that.

[kelpdiver 2]

Quote

>>i've held a magnum, but my penis got NO bigger!

>Only people like you think they do that.

Apparently not! From another thread here:

"My pecker just moved thinking about firing an M16 again."

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

phony quote!

[billvon 3,133]

>Really? So, you have copies of patent records where the stated purpose
>is to kill people? Got cites for that?

No. As I stated, I think most handguns are designed _primarily_ (not solely) to kill.

>No panic, sorry to disappoint.

Good! In that case, the statement meant what it said, and did not imply any hidden secret messages.

[skyrider 0]

Quote

>But that does not make a car designed 'solely' to kill.

In fact, it was designed NOT to kill - which makes it very, very different than a gun.

Bow and Arrow??????

Designed to Kill from day one!

[billvon 3,133]

>>>>But that does not make a car designed 'solely' to kill.

>>In fact, it was designed NOT to kill - which makes it very, very different
>>than a gun.

>Bow and Arrow??????

No, a car.

Are you sure you're answering the right posts?

[JohnRich 4]

Quote

Bow and Arrow?????? Designed to Kill from day one!

Yep, pure killin' machines they are.

On the other hand, the Chinese invented gunpowder, and used it only to make pretty fireworks in the sky. Therefore, every gun, which uses gunpowder, is nothing more than just a celebratory fireworks launcher. So there's nothing to worry about from guns!

That's the logic that these "original intent" folks want to use, to forever assign some attribute to an object, no matter how much they have changed from their original design in the meantime. So, if that's the argument they want to make, then guns are nothing but fireworks machines!

Meanwhile, automobiles, which are NOT designed to kill, manage to kill 40,000 people per year. Many more than die from guns. So the whole argument about what they're "designed" to do, is ridiculous.

Regarding the bow and arrow, at one time in history the law in England REQUIRED every man to own and be well-practiced with the longbow. They were considered essential to common defense against enemies. Just like America's 2nd Amendment.

[ChangoLanzao 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote him.

Ah, so you don't even know the quote, yet claim it is phony..... Got it.

I see you guys have looked it up and know that it's phony, so you wont even post the quote.

That's good.

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote him.

Ah, so you don't even know the quote, yet claim it is phony..... Got it.

I see you guys have looked it up and know that it's phony, so you wont even post the quote.

That's good.

How are you coming on your 'phony NRA quote' proof, Chango? Find anyone at Huff'n'Puff to back you up on it, yet?

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[skyrider 0]

Quote

Quote

Bow and Arrow?????? Designed to Kill from day one!

Yep, pure killin' machines they are.

On the other hand, the Chinese invented gunpowder, and used it only to make pretty fireworks in the sky. Therefore, every gun, which uses gunpowder, is nothing more than just a celebratory fireworks launcher. So there's nothing to worry about from guns!

That's the logic that these "original intent" folks want to use, to forever assign some attribute to an object, no matter how much they have changed from their original design in the meantime. So, if that's the argument they want to make, then guns are nothing but fireworks machines!

Meanwhile, automobiles, which are NOT designed to kill, manage to kill 40,000 people per year. Many more than die from guns. So the whole argument about what they're "designed" to do, is ridiculous.

Regarding the bow and arrow, at one time in history the law in England REQUIRED every man to own and be well-practiced with the longbow. They were considered essential to common defense against enemies. Just like America's 2nd Amendment.

Virgin Utah has a city ordanince requiring every house have a gun...Burgulary is unheard of in virgin!