kelpdiver 2 #101 June 29, 2010 Quote Fact is, rushmc makes the same lying claim repeatedly (Goebbels model of argument), but the evidence is very clear that it is a lie. Yo, Bill. I recall getting a vacation from here for comparing Kallend to Goebbels. Why the free pass for him? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,096 #102 June 29, 2010 Enough. Cut it out. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,131 #103 June 29, 2010 QuoteEnough. Cut it out. His claim, which he has now made several times is provably false.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #104 June 30, 2010 Quote This applies to the USA only. Feel free to explain your response. Here is something interesting I found.....color me not surprised Quote The 2nd. Amendment A recent Supreme Court decision has established that the people have the right to keep and bear arms for both hunting and personal protection, on this we agree completely. We go further agreeing that the amendment encompasses all types of weapons not just fire arms. We are not confused by the rhetoric of anti-Constitutional communists who claim there are too many guns, we feel there are not enough! Every person should own and carry a firearm, what would be thief or robber would attempt to ply his trade with the knowlege that most if not all those he would attack would be armed? Every citizen? Emphatically YES! Even ex-convicts? YES. EVERY citizen must be able to defend his own life, an ex-felon who maintains a clean record for 7 years should be restored to all the rights of citizenship including gun ownership, he or she too, MUST have the right to protect himself and his/ her family, otherwise they are sentenced to a life of fear. Most ex-felons are now allowed to vote if we will restore them to full citizenship then they will have a reason to rehabilitate and become productive. If an individual is too dangerous to be allowed a weapon he or she should should remain locked up. Radical? Perhaps, some might even say liberal but, they would be incorrect. We simply feel we must begin to recognize justice and the rule of law without disenfranchising as much as a quarter of the population. Like so much of our positions this is NOT an issue of race but of human rights and National security on the most basic level. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyrider 0 #105 June 30, 2010 Quote Enough. Cut it out. Could you please be more "vague"?Who? What? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #106 June 30, 2010 Quote Quote Enough. Cut it out. Could you please be more "vague"?Who? What? Read Kallend's post 88. I got a two week ban for making the same statement towards him. I point it out, ask if that's now fair game. My post disappears, Kallend's remark stands, and we get a tone it down message across all of the (unnecessarily redundant) threads. Clear as mud. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #107 June 30, 2010 Great statement regardless of who said it"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #108 June 30, 2010 Quote Quote Enough. Cut it out. Could you please be more "vague"?Who? What? "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,131 #109 June 30, 2010 Did you ever get around to apologizing for your claim that I "cherry picked" the dates in a previous thread when in fact JR and Quade had picked the dates? Oh no, you didn't.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #110 June 30, 2010 Quote Great statement regardless of who said it Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #111 June 30, 2010 Quote Quote Great statement regardless of who said it Felons are allowed to regain their rights you know."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #112 June 30, 2010 still need to post it a few thousand more times. Might come true some day. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
popsjumper 2 #113 June 30, 2010 QuoteDuring service your COC can recommend additional screening and during and after deployments additional screening is offered and sometimes mandated. But it is a very simple question and answer session. And in the case of the Ft Hood shooter.... he WAS a psychiatrist. Which raises the general question... Who are YOU (second person plural) comfortable with deciding the question of lunacy or sanity? I imagine all those that THAT guy deemed looney are screaming heebie jeebies now. Great. Give me somebody that I don't know who may be more crazy than I am. Hell, I already know I'm crazy...I skydive and post on DZ.com.My reality and yours are quite different. I think we're all Bozos on this bus. Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #114 June 30, 2010 QuoteHere is something interesting I found.....color me not surprised The fact you are reading those websites does not surprise me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #115 June 30, 2010 QuoteQuoteHere is something interesting I found.....color me not surprised The fact you are reading those websites does not surprise me. Nice PA.. I was there looking for the wonderful evidence you were seeking... since... ah fuck it ( Bill gave you a warning as well as me) if I say anything else you will get what you so dearly desire... me banned... since the moderation is unfairly stacked against me when talking to people like you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #116 June 30, 2010 QuoteNice PA.. You admitted to reading them, heck you posted a link from them. You continually claim to know about the KKK. Me not being surprised you are reading them, when you make claims about knowing them, is not a PA. Sorry if you took it that way. I am still waiting on your proof about me supporting the American Taliban you made.... Now, that clearly was a PA. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #117 June 30, 2010 QuoteQuoteNice PA.. You admitted to reading them, heck you posted a link from them. You continually claim to know about the KKK. Me not being surprised you are reading them, when you make claims about knowing them, is not a PA. Sorry if you took it that way. I am still waiting on your proof about me supporting the American Taliban you made.... Now, that clearly was a PA. The American Taliban are all those fundamental rePUBLIClown christians who would be quite happy with a FRINGE RIGHT WING THEOCRACY in this country... with a Ten Commandments in EVERY public place and all those pesky Old Testament passages on Abominations... the Law of the Land. ( IF you vote for morons like the Bush.... and Sarah... and the rest of her ilk.... you are helping what is essentially an American version of the Taliban) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #118 June 30, 2010 Still waiting for your proof, or an apology. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #119 June 30, 2010 QuoteThis applies to the USA only. Feel free to explain your response. A variety of jurisdictions have listed ANY sex, with the sole exception of missionary position between husband and wife, as Class 1 Felonies. Up until relatively recently (and maybe yet), oral sex was a hanging offense in Virginia. It is a serious Felony to put prescription drugs in a container other than the one provided by the pharmacy, such as those used to arrange doses for seriously ill patients. Prosecution is often simply a matter of being able to get convictions. As John Edgar Hoover noted, "Justice is incidental to law and order." How true. BSBD, Winsor Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #120 June 30, 2010 Quote Still waiting for your proof, or an apology. You will get no apology from me for thinking that many of the right wing posters here would be giddy with earthly delight with a Christian Theocracy in America... It would resemble the Islamic nirvana the Taliban brought to AfghanistanYou go read the Christian Identity sites for your own proof..... I am done wading thru sites oozing with feces searching for proof that is all over them for you.... I posted one passage on guns....and someone immediately thought that was a GOOD IDEA....I knew some here would love it..... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #121 June 30, 2010 I have to say I am very surprised by the outcome of this poll. The pro-gun crowd usually states that gun laws are useless, since criminals will get guns anyways. So, why then would so many of them be in favour of felons not having gun rights? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #122 June 30, 2010 QuoteI have to say I am very surprised by the outcome of this poll. The pro-gun crowd usually states that gun laws are useless, since criminals will get guns anyways. So, why then would so many of them be in favour of felons not having gun rights? Simple. It gives a legal path to give punitive justice to those that are caught breaking the law again.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 883 #123 June 30, 2010 Maybe they're more concerned with "loonies" having them. ;-) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #124 June 30, 2010 QuoteSimple. It gives a legal path to give punitive justice to those that are caught breaking the law again. Guess a felon isn't allowed to protect his family. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,096 #125 June 30, 2010 >Guess a felon isn't allowed to protect his family. Correct. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
