Lucky... 0 #1 June 19, 2010 http://www.buckeyestateblog.com/sarah_palin_cant_say_abortion_clinic_bombers_are_domestic_terrorists_mccain_calls_9_11_cities_as_filled_with_elitist Palin can't refer to abortion bombers as domestic terrorists. She ducks and ducks, yet can't bring herself to state the obvious; abortion clinic bombers are terrorists. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #2 June 19, 2010 Did I miss something? Did one of these fuckwads kill another doctor? What does this have to do with anything going on right now?quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #3 June 19, 2010 QuoteQuoteDid I miss something? Did one of these fuckwads kill another doctor? What does this have to do with anything going on right now? I don't think there is anything new, but pointing out Sarah's Hypocrisy is always fun. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #4 June 19, 2010 QuoteDid I miss something? Did one of these fuckwads kill another doctor? What does this have to do with anything going on right now? As the title reads, "Maybe not new, but still relevant." I don't recall Palin refusing to acknowledge Eric Rudolph as a terrorist as she was being interviewed by the media, so this is new to me per my memory. I was doing reading on the 10 worst prisons in light of the assholw who killed Halloway and the Peruvian girl, Vander Sloot. I ran across ADX and did a search of its current prisoners. No big deal, just citing an event about 2 years ago. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #5 June 19, 2010 Quote As the title reads, "Maybe not new, but still relevant." when was Sarah Palin ever relevant?-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #6 June 19, 2010 QuoteQuote As the title reads, "Maybe not new, but still relevant." when was Sarah Palin ever relevant? Gee she seems to be the spokesperson formost of the teabaggers out there Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #7 June 19, 2010 QuoteQuote As the title reads, "Maybe not new, but still relevant." when was Sarah Palin ever relevant? Your party selected her and her senile boyfriend to lead the country and they got 59M votes. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #8 June 19, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuote As the title reads, "Maybe not new, but still relevant." when was Sarah Palin ever relevant? Gee she seems to be the spokesperson formost of the teabaggers out there We know she's in love with abortion doctor killers, usually people in her position will at least fake it and act disgusted. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdvr 210 #9 June 19, 2010 Quote I was doing reading on the 10 worst prisons Thinking about relocating? Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #10 June 19, 2010 Quote Quote I was doing reading on the 10 worst prisons Thinking about relocating? No, I'm not a Republican, Enronite, etc..... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #11 June 19, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuote As the title reads, "Maybe not new, but still relevant." when was Sarah Palin ever relevant? Your party selected her and her senile boyfriend to lead the country and they got 59M votes. how many times do I have to tell you I don't belong to a party. You keep claiming to know things about me. But you don't.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #12 June 19, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote As the title reads, "Maybe not new, but still relevant." when was Sarah Palin ever relevant? Your party selected her and her senile boyfriend to lead the country and they got 59M votes. how many times do I have to tell you I don't belong to a party. You keep claiming to know things about me. But you don't. My bad, you're an extremist conservative who thinks taxes are bad for the economy, abortion and gay marriage are also bad, pro-military expansion, yet you vote Democratically. Tell ya what, list all the presidents you've voted for in order. I'm guessing that won't be provided, right? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #13 June 19, 2010 Quote My bad, you're an extremist conservative who thinks taxes are bad for the economy, abortion and gay marriage are also bad, pro-military expansion, yet you vote Democratically. again. You are assuming things about me. I think taxes are being implemented poorly. abortion is none of the federal government's business. Gay marriage shouldn't be an issue (I've posted about this before) it also is none of the fed.gov's business. Our military needs to be the size it needs to be based on it's current mission (with a little extra because you don't know what's coming next year and it takes time to spin up new forces). And I vote for the candidate that displeases me the least. I've yet to see a candidate that pleases me. *** Tell ya what, list all the presidents you've voted for in order. I'm guessing that won't be provided, right? I'll tell you I didn't vote for McCain, I didn't vote for W the second time, I did the first time. Beyond that I'll choose not to share. (since it IS a secret ballot and all) I'm sorry, am I breaking your misconceptions?-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #14 June 19, 2010 QuoteMy bad, you're an extremist conservative who thinks taxes are bad for the economy, abortion and gay marriage are also bad, pro-military expansion, yet you vote Democratically. Quoteagain. You are assuming things about me. I think taxes are being implemented poorly. Ahhh, I asked about taxation, not outlays; see if you can answer the questions asked. So, are tax increases good or bad? Explain/support why by using theory AND application via history. I don't expect an answer. Quoteabortion is none of the federal government's business. That's your opinion, but as with guns, it is their business. You might disagree, but that is the law of the land. QuoteGay marriage shouldn't be an issue (I've posted about this before) it also is none of the fed.gov's business. I wonder if there were people (in teh south) saying slavery isn't the gov's business? See, when you have states running amuck, w/o gov intervention there would be totalitarian BS as with Mexico and other countries where isolated factions, we call them states, could just make up tehir own rules. QuoteOur military needs to be the size it needs to be based on it's current mission (with a little extra because you don't know what's coming next year and it takes time to spin up new forces). So you think us spending 8 times what #2 spends, we match the world $ for $ and you say we need that: why? What requires we keep that massive level going because???????? Who is out to get us? WHat technology do they have that requires we get sick and massive with this kind of spending? Support. QuoteAnd I vote for the candidate that displeases me the least. I've yet to see a candidate that pleases me. Clinton didn't please you? Why? Quote Tell ya what, list all the presidents you've voted for in order. I'm guessing that won't be provided, right?Quote QuoteI/'ll tell you I didn't vote for McCain, I didn't vote for W the second time, I did the first time. Beyond that I'll choose not to share. (since it IS a secret ballot and all) Of course you won't disclose that, as it would easily prove my point; you're a classic conservative: - Blow up the military - Run up the debt - Shoot before negotiate - Kill social benefits - Etc, etc, etc BTW, telling who you didn;t vote for does nothing. aybe you went with the loons and voted Libertarian, maybe you abstained. The secrecy of the ballot refers to compulsory disclosure, I'm actually proud of who I voted for, you apparently are not of who you voted for. QuoteI'm sorry, am I breaking your misconceptions? No, actually you confirmed them quite well. Just keep pretending to be bipartisan while being a typical conservative. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterrig 1 #15 June 19, 2010 She can see Russia from her house!Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #16 June 19, 2010 Quote She can see Russia from her house!Chuck I suppose if you get high enough at her house....... uh huh Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterrig 1 #17 June 19, 2010 Quote Quote She can see Russia from her house!Chuck I suppose if you get high enough at her house....... uh huh She probably gets high smokin' moose shit!Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhaig 0 #18 June 19, 2010 Quote I don't expect an answer. good. I'd say I hate to disappoint, but it's just you. Quote ***abortion is none of the federal government's business. That's your opinion, but as with guns, it is their business. You might disagree, but that is the law of the land. You misunderstand. It's between a woman, her doctor, and the father of the baby if the woman chooses to involve him. Nobody else need be involved. Quote ***Gay marriage shouldn't be an issue (I've posted about this before) it also is none of the fed.gov's business. I wonder if there were people (in teh south) saying slavery isn't the gov's business? See, when you have states running amuck, w/o gov intervention there would be totalitarian BS as with Mexico and other countries where isolated factions, we call them states, could just make up tehir own rules. as with abortion, gay marriage is between the two people being married (as with all marriage). There need be nobody else (including state governments) involved. Quote ***And I vote for the candidate that displeases me the least. I've yet to see a candidate that pleases me. Clinton didn't please you? Why? I didn't vote in that election. I was drunk most of that year. Quote Quote Tell ya what, list all the presidents you've voted for in order. I'm guessing that won't be provided, right?Quote ***I/'ll tell you I didn't vote for McCain, I didn't vote for W the second time, I did the first time. Beyond that I'll choose not to share. (since it IS a secret ballot and all) Of course you won't disclose that, as it would easily prove my point; you're a classic conservative: - Blow up the military - Run up the debt - Shoot before negotiate - Kill social benefits - Etc, etc, etc BTW, telling who you didn;t vote for does nothing. aybe you went with the loons and voted Libertarian, maybe you abstained. The secrecy of the ballot refers to compulsory disclosure, I'm actually proud of who I voted for, you apparently are not of who you voted for. QuoteI'm sorry, am I breaking your misconceptions? No, actually you confirmed them quite well. Just keep pretending to be bipartisan while being a typical conservative. you make me laugh. Thanks for the evening humor. I'd quote quade right here, if I didn't think lame poetry here and a disclaimer that I was using the royal you would be ignored (as it should have in his post).-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Lucky... 0 #19 June 20, 2010 QuoteI don't expect an answer. Quotegood. I'd say I hate to disappoint, but it's just you. I'd say your dissappointing yourself by having such strong convictions and not being able to supporrt them. Quoteabortion is none of the federal government's business. QuoteThat's your opinion, but as with guns, it is their business. You might disagree, but that is the law of the land. QuoteYou misunderstand. It's between a woman, her doctor, and the father of the baby if the woman chooses to involve him. Nobody else need be involved. You misunderstand, the federal government has to intervien or many states would autocratically decide for themselves and we would have different protections/rights as we cross borders. You know, that 14th thing you conservatives hate. QuoteGay marriage shouldn't be an issue (I've posted about this before) it also is none of the fed.gov's business. QuoteI wonder if there were people (in teh south) saying slavery isn't the gov's business? See, when you have states running amuck, w/o gov intervention there would be totalitarian BS as with Mexico and other countries where isolated factions, we call them states, could just make up tehir own rules. Quote as with abortion, gay marriage is between the two people being married (as with all marriage). There need be nobody else (including state governments) involved. Again, if left to most states, these elements wouldn't be allowed, so the FED GOV deas need to be allowed into these issues. See how the 14th follows the 13th by a year or so? After slavery prohibition on a federal level, southern states said that was a federal isse so as long as we don't cross state lines or make it a federal jurisdictional issue, we can still do it. OF course the 14th immediately follow making the BOR and reallly all relevant amendments and the entire constitution apply to the states. This is why the feds need to be involved, fuck the individual states. QuoteAnd I vote for the candidate that displeases me the least. I've yet to see a candidate that pleases me. QuoteClinton didn't please you? Why? Quote I didn't vote in that election. I was drunk most of that year. 'That election?" Maybe you forgot he was elected 2 times. Maybe too much drinking then for 8 years, huh? I didn't vote for Clinton eitther time, yet I think his presidency was greatly successful, esp fiscally. You can comment on a presidency whether you voted for him/her or not. So what's your opinion of the Clinton presidency and why? Quote Tell ya what, list all the presidents you've voted for in order. I'm guessing that won't be provided, right?Quote QuoteI/'ll tell you I didn't vote for McCain, I didn't vote for W the second time, I did the first time. Beyond that I'll choose not to share. (since it IS a secret ballot and all) QuoteOf course you won't disclose that, as it would easily prove my point; you're a classic conservative: - Blow up the military - Run up the debt - Shoot before negotiate - Kill social benefits - Etc, etc, etc BTW, telling who you didn;t vote for does nothing. aybe you went with the loons and voted Libertarian, maybe you abstained. The secrecy of the ballot refers to compulsory disclosure, I'm actually proud of who I voted for, you apparently are not of who you voted for. QuoteI'm sorry, am I breaking your misconceptions? QuoteNo, actually you confirmed them quite well. Just keep pretending to be bipartisan while being a typical conservative. Quoteyou make me laugh. Thanks for the evening humor. Hey, it's your right to keep your ballot choice secret, it's also our choice to opine that your politics are selective and inconsistent. QuoteI'd quote quade right here, if I didn't think lame poetry here and a disclaimer that I was using the royal you would be ignored (as it should have in his post). Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. ---------> Ahhh, I asked about taxation, not outlays; see if you can answer the questions asked. So, are tax increases good or bad? Explain/support why by using theory AND application via history. I don't expect an answer. ---------> So you think us spending 8 times what #2 spends, we match the world $ for $ and you say we need that: why? What requires we keep that massive level going because???????? Who is out to get us? WHat technology do they have that requires we get sick and massive with this kind of spending? Support. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhaig 0 #20 June 20, 2010 Quote Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. You don't have that much. You're not that important to me.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Lucky... 0 #21 June 20, 2010 QuoteQuote Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. You don't have that much. You're not that important to me. It's not about me, it's about your integrity and your ability to answer questions rather than run and dodge. What do you think people opine when they see anyone with strong political beliefs that run from questions? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites timmyfitz 0 #22 June 21, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. You don't have that much. You're not that important to me. It's not about me, it's about your integrity and your ability to answer questions rather than run and dodge. What do you think people opine when they see anyone with strong political beliefs that run from questions? It is just the internet, Lucky. You are fooling yourself if you believe that all that you write matters in the scheme of things. This is an obscure website with very limited audience. This is not CNN. You are not changing anyone's opinion or the world. I guess you just need some outlet to vent your rage.(along with many others ) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites turtlespeed 226 #23 June 21, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. You don't have that much. You're not that important to me. It's not about me, it's about your integrity and your ability to answer questions rather than run and dodge. What do you think people opine when they see anyone with strong political beliefs that run from questions? It is just the internet, Lucky. You are fooling yourself if you believe that all that you write matters in the scheme of things. This is an obscure website with very limited audience. This is not CNN. You are not changing anyone's opinion or the world. I guess you just need some outlet to vent your rage.(along with many others ) NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!Say it ain't SO!I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,120 #24 June 21, 2010 >abortion clinic bombers are terrorists. Yeah, but they're also voters. And she can't afford to lose the potential-abortion-clinic-bomber vote. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing × Sign In Sign Up Forums Dropzones Classifieds Gear Indoor Articles Photos Videos Calendar Stolen Fatalities Subscriptions Leaderboard Activity Back Activity All Activity My Activity Streams Unread Content Content I Started
masterrig 1 #15 June 19, 2010 She can see Russia from her house!Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #16 June 19, 2010 Quote She can see Russia from her house!Chuck I suppose if you get high enough at her house....... uh huh Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #17 June 19, 2010 Quote Quote She can see Russia from her house!Chuck I suppose if you get high enough at her house....... uh huh She probably gets high smokin' moose shit!Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #18 June 19, 2010 Quote I don't expect an answer. good. I'd say I hate to disappoint, but it's just you. Quote ***abortion is none of the federal government's business. That's your opinion, but as with guns, it is their business. You might disagree, but that is the law of the land. You misunderstand. It's between a woman, her doctor, and the father of the baby if the woman chooses to involve him. Nobody else need be involved. Quote ***Gay marriage shouldn't be an issue (I've posted about this before) it also is none of the fed.gov's business. I wonder if there were people (in teh south) saying slavery isn't the gov's business? See, when you have states running amuck, w/o gov intervention there would be totalitarian BS as with Mexico and other countries where isolated factions, we call them states, could just make up tehir own rules. as with abortion, gay marriage is between the two people being married (as with all marriage). There need be nobody else (including state governments) involved. Quote ***And I vote for the candidate that displeases me the least. I've yet to see a candidate that pleases me. Clinton didn't please you? Why? I didn't vote in that election. I was drunk most of that year. Quote Quote Tell ya what, list all the presidents you've voted for in order. I'm guessing that won't be provided, right?Quote ***I/'ll tell you I didn't vote for McCain, I didn't vote for W the second time, I did the first time. Beyond that I'll choose not to share. (since it IS a secret ballot and all) Of course you won't disclose that, as it would easily prove my point; you're a classic conservative: - Blow up the military - Run up the debt - Shoot before negotiate - Kill social benefits - Etc, etc, etc BTW, telling who you didn;t vote for does nothing. aybe you went with the loons and voted Libertarian, maybe you abstained. The secrecy of the ballot refers to compulsory disclosure, I'm actually proud of who I voted for, you apparently are not of who you voted for. QuoteI'm sorry, am I breaking your misconceptions? No, actually you confirmed them quite well. Just keep pretending to be bipartisan while being a typical conservative. you make me laugh. Thanks for the evening humor. I'd quote quade right here, if I didn't think lame poetry here and a disclaimer that I was using the royal you would be ignored (as it should have in his post).-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Lucky... 0 #19 June 20, 2010 QuoteI don't expect an answer. Quotegood. I'd say I hate to disappoint, but it's just you. I'd say your dissappointing yourself by having such strong convictions and not being able to supporrt them. Quoteabortion is none of the federal government's business. QuoteThat's your opinion, but as with guns, it is their business. You might disagree, but that is the law of the land. QuoteYou misunderstand. It's between a woman, her doctor, and the father of the baby if the woman chooses to involve him. Nobody else need be involved. You misunderstand, the federal government has to intervien or many states would autocratically decide for themselves and we would have different protections/rights as we cross borders. You know, that 14th thing you conservatives hate. QuoteGay marriage shouldn't be an issue (I've posted about this before) it also is none of the fed.gov's business. QuoteI wonder if there were people (in teh south) saying slavery isn't the gov's business? See, when you have states running amuck, w/o gov intervention there would be totalitarian BS as with Mexico and other countries where isolated factions, we call them states, could just make up tehir own rules. Quote as with abortion, gay marriage is between the two people being married (as with all marriage). There need be nobody else (including state governments) involved. Again, if left to most states, these elements wouldn't be allowed, so the FED GOV deas need to be allowed into these issues. See how the 14th follows the 13th by a year or so? After slavery prohibition on a federal level, southern states said that was a federal isse so as long as we don't cross state lines or make it a federal jurisdictional issue, we can still do it. OF course the 14th immediately follow making the BOR and reallly all relevant amendments and the entire constitution apply to the states. This is why the feds need to be involved, fuck the individual states. QuoteAnd I vote for the candidate that displeases me the least. I've yet to see a candidate that pleases me. QuoteClinton didn't please you? Why? Quote I didn't vote in that election. I was drunk most of that year. 'That election?" Maybe you forgot he was elected 2 times. Maybe too much drinking then for 8 years, huh? I didn't vote for Clinton eitther time, yet I think his presidency was greatly successful, esp fiscally. You can comment on a presidency whether you voted for him/her or not. So what's your opinion of the Clinton presidency and why? Quote Tell ya what, list all the presidents you've voted for in order. I'm guessing that won't be provided, right?Quote QuoteI/'ll tell you I didn't vote for McCain, I didn't vote for W the second time, I did the first time. Beyond that I'll choose not to share. (since it IS a secret ballot and all) QuoteOf course you won't disclose that, as it would easily prove my point; you're a classic conservative: - Blow up the military - Run up the debt - Shoot before negotiate - Kill social benefits - Etc, etc, etc BTW, telling who you didn;t vote for does nothing. aybe you went with the loons and voted Libertarian, maybe you abstained. The secrecy of the ballot refers to compulsory disclosure, I'm actually proud of who I voted for, you apparently are not of who you voted for. QuoteI'm sorry, am I breaking your misconceptions? QuoteNo, actually you confirmed them quite well. Just keep pretending to be bipartisan while being a typical conservative. Quoteyou make me laugh. Thanks for the evening humor. Hey, it's your right to keep your ballot choice secret, it's also our choice to opine that your politics are selective and inconsistent. QuoteI'd quote quade right here, if I didn't think lame poetry here and a disclaimer that I was using the royal you would be ignored (as it should have in his post). Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. ---------> Ahhh, I asked about taxation, not outlays; see if you can answer the questions asked. So, are tax increases good or bad? Explain/support why by using theory AND application via history. I don't expect an answer. ---------> So you think us spending 8 times what #2 spends, we match the world $ for $ and you say we need that: why? What requires we keep that massive level going because???????? Who is out to get us? WHat technology do they have that requires we get sick and massive with this kind of spending? Support. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhaig 0 #20 June 20, 2010 Quote Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. You don't have that much. You're not that important to me.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Lucky... 0 #21 June 20, 2010 QuoteQuote Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. You don't have that much. You're not that important to me. It's not about me, it's about your integrity and your ability to answer questions rather than run and dodge. What do you think people opine when they see anyone with strong political beliefs that run from questions? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites timmyfitz 0 #22 June 21, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. You don't have that much. You're not that important to me. It's not about me, it's about your integrity and your ability to answer questions rather than run and dodge. What do you think people opine when they see anyone with strong political beliefs that run from questions? It is just the internet, Lucky. You are fooling yourself if you believe that all that you write matters in the scheme of things. This is an obscure website with very limited audience. This is not CNN. You are not changing anyone's opinion or the world. I guess you just need some outlet to vent your rage.(along with many others ) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites turtlespeed 226 #23 June 21, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. You don't have that much. You're not that important to me. It's not about me, it's about your integrity and your ability to answer questions rather than run and dodge. What do you think people opine when they see anyone with strong political beliefs that run from questions? It is just the internet, Lucky. You are fooling yourself if you believe that all that you write matters in the scheme of things. This is an obscure website with very limited audience. This is not CNN. You are not changing anyone's opinion or the world. I guess you just need some outlet to vent your rage.(along with many others ) NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!Say it ain't SO!I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,120 #24 June 21, 2010 >abortion clinic bombers are terrorists. Yeah, but they're also voters. And she can't afford to lose the potential-abortion-clinic-bomber vote. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
Lucky... 0 #19 June 20, 2010 QuoteI don't expect an answer. Quotegood. I'd say I hate to disappoint, but it's just you. I'd say your dissappointing yourself by having such strong convictions and not being able to supporrt them. Quoteabortion is none of the federal government's business. QuoteThat's your opinion, but as with guns, it is their business. You might disagree, but that is the law of the land. QuoteYou misunderstand. It's between a woman, her doctor, and the father of the baby if the woman chooses to involve him. Nobody else need be involved. You misunderstand, the federal government has to intervien or many states would autocratically decide for themselves and we would have different protections/rights as we cross borders. You know, that 14th thing you conservatives hate. QuoteGay marriage shouldn't be an issue (I've posted about this before) it also is none of the fed.gov's business. QuoteI wonder if there were people (in teh south) saying slavery isn't the gov's business? See, when you have states running amuck, w/o gov intervention there would be totalitarian BS as with Mexico and other countries where isolated factions, we call them states, could just make up tehir own rules. Quote as with abortion, gay marriage is between the two people being married (as with all marriage). There need be nobody else (including state governments) involved. Again, if left to most states, these elements wouldn't be allowed, so the FED GOV deas need to be allowed into these issues. See how the 14th follows the 13th by a year or so? After slavery prohibition on a federal level, southern states said that was a federal isse so as long as we don't cross state lines or make it a federal jurisdictional issue, we can still do it. OF course the 14th immediately follow making the BOR and reallly all relevant amendments and the entire constitution apply to the states. This is why the feds need to be involved, fuck the individual states. QuoteAnd I vote for the candidate that displeases me the least. I've yet to see a candidate that pleases me. QuoteClinton didn't please you? Why? Quote I didn't vote in that election. I was drunk most of that year. 'That election?" Maybe you forgot he was elected 2 times. Maybe too much drinking then for 8 years, huh? I didn't vote for Clinton eitther time, yet I think his presidency was greatly successful, esp fiscally. You can comment on a presidency whether you voted for him/her or not. So what's your opinion of the Clinton presidency and why? Quote Tell ya what, list all the presidents you've voted for in order. I'm guessing that won't be provided, right?Quote QuoteI/'ll tell you I didn't vote for McCain, I didn't vote for W the second time, I did the first time. Beyond that I'll choose not to share. (since it IS a secret ballot and all) QuoteOf course you won't disclose that, as it would easily prove my point; you're a classic conservative: - Blow up the military - Run up the debt - Shoot before negotiate - Kill social benefits - Etc, etc, etc BTW, telling who you didn;t vote for does nothing. aybe you went with the loons and voted Libertarian, maybe you abstained. The secrecy of the ballot refers to compulsory disclosure, I'm actually proud of who I voted for, you apparently are not of who you voted for. QuoteI'm sorry, am I breaking your misconceptions? QuoteNo, actually you confirmed them quite well. Just keep pretending to be bipartisan while being a typical conservative. Quoteyou make me laugh. Thanks for the evening humor. Hey, it's your right to keep your ballot choice secret, it's also our choice to opine that your politics are selective and inconsistent. QuoteI'd quote quade right here, if I didn't think lame poetry here and a disclaimer that I was using the royal you would be ignored (as it should have in his post). Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. ---------> Ahhh, I asked about taxation, not outlays; see if you can answer the questions asked. So, are tax increases good or bad? Explain/support why by using theory AND application via history. I don't expect an answer. ---------> So you think us spending 8 times what #2 spends, we match the world $ for $ and you say we need that: why? What requires we keep that massive level going because???????? Who is out to get us? WHat technology do they have that requires we get sick and massive with this kind of spending? Support. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhaig 0 #20 June 20, 2010 Quote Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. You don't have that much. You're not that important to me.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Lucky... 0 #21 June 20, 2010 QuoteQuote Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. You don't have that much. You're not that important to me. It's not about me, it's about your integrity and your ability to answer questions rather than run and dodge. What do you think people opine when they see anyone with strong political beliefs that run from questions? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites timmyfitz 0 #22 June 21, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. You don't have that much. You're not that important to me. It's not about me, it's about your integrity and your ability to answer questions rather than run and dodge. What do you think people opine when they see anyone with strong political beliefs that run from questions? It is just the internet, Lucky. You are fooling yourself if you believe that all that you write matters in the scheme of things. This is an obscure website with very limited audience. This is not CNN. You are not changing anyone's opinion or the world. I guess you just need some outlet to vent your rage.(along with many others ) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites turtlespeed 226 #23 June 21, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. You don't have that much. You're not that important to me. It's not about me, it's about your integrity and your ability to answer questions rather than run and dodge. What do you think people opine when they see anyone with strong political beliefs that run from questions? It is just the internet, Lucky. You are fooling yourself if you believe that all that you write matters in the scheme of things. This is an obscure website with very limited audience. This is not CNN. You are not changing anyone's opinion or the world. I guess you just need some outlet to vent your rage.(along with many others ) NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!Say it ain't SO!I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,120 #24 June 21, 2010 >abortion clinic bombers are terrorists. Yeah, but they're also voters. And she can't afford to lose the potential-abortion-clinic-bomber vote. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
rhaig 0 #20 June 20, 2010 Quote Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. You don't have that much. You're not that important to me.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #21 June 20, 2010 QuoteQuote Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. You don't have that much. You're not that important to me. It's not about me, it's about your integrity and your ability to answer questions rather than run and dodge. What do you think people opine when they see anyone with strong political beliefs that run from questions? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
timmyfitz 0 #22 June 21, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. You don't have that much. You're not that important to me. It's not about me, it's about your integrity and your ability to answer questions rather than run and dodge. What do you think people opine when they see anyone with strong political beliefs that run from questions? It is just the internet, Lucky. You are fooling yourself if you believe that all that you write matters in the scheme of things. This is an obscure website with very limited audience. This is not CNN. You are not changing anyone's opinion or the world. I guess you just need some outlet to vent your rage.(along with many others ) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #23 June 21, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote Been drinking again? Also, you missed a couple points, let's see if have what it takes to actually answer them. You don't have that much. You're not that important to me. It's not about me, it's about your integrity and your ability to answer questions rather than run and dodge. What do you think people opine when they see anyone with strong political beliefs that run from questions? It is just the internet, Lucky. You are fooling yourself if you believe that all that you write matters in the scheme of things. This is an obscure website with very limited audience. This is not CNN. You are not changing anyone's opinion or the world. I guess you just need some outlet to vent your rage.(along with many others ) NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!Say it ain't SO!I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #24 June 21, 2010 >abortion clinic bombers are terrorists. Yeah, but they're also voters. And she can't afford to lose the potential-abortion-clinic-bomber vote. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
