0
rushmc

41% and still falling

Recommended Posts

Quote

Remember back when Bush's polls were in the toilet, and you kept saying how meaningless polls were? Now you can't get enough of them. Funny how quickly your opinion changes when you have a chance to attack someone.



Yep - the roles have indeed reversed - just look at how much weight do you assign to the polls now?
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Remember back when Bush's polls were in the toilet, and you kept saying how meaningless polls were? Now you can't get enough of them. Funny how quickly your opinion changes when you have a chance to attack someone.



Attack?

You just posted something about getting a beer. Better take your own advice

Now, I have also stated before that the left loves to post them when they support their views and I have noticed that it have been very very quite on the poll front here and in the news.
Just wanted to help you lefties out and keep the polls coming since that is what they need to govern:)
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Remember back when Bush's polls were in the toilet, and you kept saying how meaningless polls were? Now you can't get enough of them. Funny how quickly your opinion changes when you have a chance to attack someone.



Attack?

You just posted something about getting a beer. Better take your own advice

Now, I have also stated before that the left loves to post them when they support their views and I have noticed that it have been very very quite on the poll front here and in the news.
Just wanted to help you lefties out and keep the polls coming since that is what they need to govern:)


I think you are supposed to call them "Progressives" now.

Used in a sentence: Obama's poll numbers have been getting Progressively worse.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Remember back when Bush's polls were in the toilet, and you kept saying how meaningless polls were? Now you can't get enough of them. Funny how quickly your opinion changes when you have a chance to attack someone.



Attack?

You just posted something about getting a beer. Better take your own advice

Now, I have also stated before that the left loves to post them when they support their views and I have noticed that it have been very very quite on the poll front here and in the news.
Just wanted to help you lefties out and keep the polls coming since that is what they need to govern:)


I think you are supposed to call them "Progressives" now.

Used in a sentence: Obama's poll numbers have been getting Progressively worse.


LOL


oooohhhhhhhh ouch

:D
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Attack? You just posted something about getting a beer. Better
>take your own advice

I'm not the one doing the ten Obama attack posts a day, my angry friend.

>Now, I have also stated before that the left loves to post them when they
>support their views and I have noticed that it have been very very quite
>on the poll front here and in the news.

Yep, that they do. And you do exactly the same. But keep attacking others for it, then claiming the high road.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>Attack? You just posted something about getting a beer. Better
>take your own advice

I'm not the one doing the ten Obama attack posts a day, my angry friend.

>Now, I have also stated before that the left loves to post them when they
>support their views and I have noticed that it have been very very quite
>on the poll front here and in the news.

Yep, that they do. And you do exactly the same. But keep attacking others for it, then claiming the high road.



Oh please - how can he claim something you believe is your inalienable right to posess?
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>Attack? You just posted something about getting a beer. Better
>take your own advice

I'm not the one doing the ten Obama attack posts a day, my angry friend.

>Now, I have also stated before that the left loves to post them when they
>support their views and I have noticed that it have been very very quite
>on the poll front here and in the news.

Yep, that they do. And you do exactly the same. But keep attacking others for it, then claiming the high road.



Projecting the anger thing yet again Bill?

No, you are the one who claims indignace when another Obama failure is brought to light. (and there are many. Too many for this early in a term) And you are showing yourself to be a bit testy lately dont you think?:)
I love how pointing out things about Obama is an attack of some kind in you lefties eyes

Is it the same when reversed?

Oh never mind
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>No, you are the one who claims indignace when another Obama failure is
>brought to light.

?? Not indignant at all. Just noting the flipflop in your position on polls. I'm sure you will flipflop right back once those numbers climb (or once a republican president's numbers fall.)

>I love how pointing out things about Obama is an attack of some kind
>in you lefties eyes

If you think a post entitled "Obama liar liar" is a rational post pointing out things about someone, as opposed to an attack - well, that does indeed explain your worldview a little bit better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>No, you are the one who claims indignace when another Obama failure is
>brought to light.

?? Not indignant at all. Just noting the flipflop in your position on polls. I'm sure you will flipflop right back once those numbers climb (or once a republican president's numbers fall.)

>I love how pointing out things about Obama is an attack of some kind
>in you lefties eyes

If you think a post entitled "Obama liar liar" is a rational post pointing out things about someone, as opposed to an attack - well, that does indeed explain your worldview a little bit better.



Bill you really need a beer - or 10 . . .
Relax a bit and realize that it was a sarcastic title. I know you have never posted a sarcastic title, but you may consider they exist without actual attack.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>No, you are the one who claims indignace when another Obama failure is
>brought to light.

?? Not indignant at all. Just noting the flipflop in your position on polls. I'm sure you will flipflop right back once those numbers climb (or once a republican president's numbers fall.)

>I love how pointing out things about Obama is an attack of some kind
>in you lefties eyes

If you think a post entitled "Obama liar liar" is a rational post pointing out things about someone, as opposed to an attack - well, that does indeed explain your worldview a little bit better.



No flip flop on my part sir. My old posts need only be reviewed to see how consistent I am here:)
So now pointing out the truth and showing he lied with his own words is an attack now too?

Bill, you have now had enough beer[:/]
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Since I seriously doubt that he was the one posting Bush's crappy numbers, who was bringing them up? Why aren't they commenting now?



And who exactly were "they"?

We're talking thread starters. Who started threads about GWB's poll numbers?
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

>No, you are the one who claims indignace when another Obama failure is
>brought to light.

?? Not indignant at all. Just noting the flipflop in your position on polls. I'm sure you will flipflop right back once those numbers climb (or once a republican president's numbers fall.)

>I love how pointing out things about Obama is an attack of some kind
>in you lefties eyes

If you think a post entitled "Obama liar liar" is a rational post pointing out things about someone, as opposed to an attack - well, that does indeed explain your worldview a little bit better.



No flip flop on my part sir. My old posts need only be reviewed to see how consistent I am here:)
So now pointing out the truth and showing he lied with his own words is an attack now too?

Bill, you have now had enough beer[:/]


Of course it is - anything said in opposition to Obama is an attack. Anything said in defense of those that attack Obama is conspiracy theory. Anything said to quash anything said against Obama is truth and reality.

You must have missed the memo.[:/]
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

>No, you are the one who claims indignace when another Obama failure is
>brought to light.

?? Not indignant at all. Just noting the flipflop in your position on polls. I'm sure you will flipflop right back once those numbers climb (or once a republican president's numbers fall.)

>I love how pointing out things about Obama is an attack of some kind
>in you lefties eyes

If you think a post entitled "Obama liar liar" is a rational post pointing out things about someone, as opposed to an attack - well, that does indeed explain your worldview a little bit better.



No flip flop on my part sir. My old posts need only be reviewed to see how consistent I am here:)
So now pointing out the truth and showing he lied with his own words is an attack now too?

Bill, you have now had enough beer[:/]


Of course it is - anything said in opposition to Obama is an attack. Anything said in defense of those that attack Obama is conspiracy theory. Anything said to quash anything said against Obama is truth and reality.

You must have missed the memo.[:/]


Im sorry:$
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

>No, you are the one who claims indignace when another Obama failure is
>brought to light.

?? Not indignant at all. Just noting the flipflop in your position on polls. I'm sure you will flipflop right back once those numbers climb (or once a republican president's numbers fall.)

>I love how pointing out things about Obama is an attack of some kind
>in you lefties eyes

If you think a post entitled "Obama liar liar" is a rational post pointing out things about someone, as opposed to an attack - well, that does indeed explain your worldview a little bit better.



No flip flop on my part sir. My old posts need only be reviewed to see how consistent I am here:)
So now pointing out the truth and showing he lied with his own words is an attack now too?

Bill, you have now had enough beer[:/]


Of course it is - anything said in opposition to Obama is an attack. Anything said in defense of those that attack Obama is conspiracy theory. Anything said to quash anything said against Obama is truth and reality.

You must have missed the memo.[:/]


Im sorry:$


It's ok - it is right ther under the memo about cover sheets for your TPS reports.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


I said thread STARTERS. POP started that one, yet you seem to want to attribute the commotion over polling numbers to Lucky.

Nice try though.


:DWhat a redirect
I did a search and found a thread

:D:D
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

I said thread STARTERS. POP started that one, yet you seem to want to attribute the commotion over polling numbers to Lucky.
Nice try though.

:DWhat a redirect
I did a search and found a thread
:D:D


It's not a redirect. Here's what I specifically said;
Quote


And who exactly were "they"?

We're talking thread starters. Who started threads about GWB's poll numbers?



You linked to a post made by Lucky that was in response to one made by Pop. It wasn't a redirect; it was a factual statement.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Remember back when Bush's polls were in the toilet, and you kept saying how meaningless polls were? Now you can't get enough of them. Funny how quickly your opinion changes when you have a chance to attack someone.



Both of you guys are right - the other guy's politician sucks.

While the incumbent is more personable than his predecessor, and is neither a blithering idiot nor anywhere near the national embarassment, they have one quality in common - they are both entirely incompetent.

To hear people argue about which of these turkeys is better is like listening to a discussion of whether feline feces is markedly superior to canine , or whether cyanide is more dangerous than GB. When all is said and done, it's six of one, half a dozen of the other.

Just because Bush was an unmitigated disaster does not mean Obama is the slightest bit better overall - and vice-versa.

If either of these clowns is a reflection of us as a nation, we are truly mediocre.


BSBD,

Winsor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I'm confused. Is your post considered a dodge, a duck, or a redirect?



Dodge is a truck.
billvon is a duck.
Redirect is a way,
For a lawyer to say,
Go fuck yourself all day.

(Sorry, I just couldn't help myself on that one. BTW, that's the royal "yourself" and not you specifically Divot.)
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0