diablopilot 2 #51 June 16, 2010 QuoteBe that as it may, you'll notice a number of details vary considerably from the article linked in the original post. For instance, a call at 6am is hardly the "middle of the night." "Pyles voluntarily came out of his house just before 7 a.m., was handcuffed, and agreed to point out guns and ammunition in his home so police could collect them," is different than, "The police enter your home without a warrant, without permission, without probable cause and confiscate your firearms." Thanks for ferreting the other article out for us to compare the accounts. Look up the term "under duress".---------------------------------------------- You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #52 June 16, 2010 QuoteFunny how he said nothing of the sort. He has in the past. QuoteIt does seem, though, that the people who are most vocal about 2nd amendment rights seem to have a tendency towards an irrational paranoia about Obama. No different than how some liberals want to blame Bush for everything. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #53 June 16, 2010 QuoteFor instance, a call at 6am is hardly the "middle of the night." They stared rolling at 3AM. QuoteMedford's hostage negotiators and SWAT team were called in at 3 a.m. Monday and arrived on the scene at about 5:45 a.m., he said. They watched his house all night QuotePolice negotiators and a SWAT team descended on his Effie Street home in the predawn hours of March 8 after police had watched the home overnight and "At around 9 p.m., Medford police started surveillance at Pyles' Effie Street home, Detective Bill Ford, one of the officers conducting the surveillance, wrote in his report." and "At 11:45 p.m. on March 7, George summoned SWAT team members to assist with surveillance at Pyles' house and sent Ford to call other ODOT employees for additional information." And he made no threats: QuoteMarmon told the officers that Pyles hadn't made any specific threats of violence, but he was concerned about "possible retaliation or workplace violence," and "Retzer said he didn't find any threats toward Pyles' coworkers or supervisors or any indication that Pyles would harm himself." So I guess if I suddenly was 'concerned' you might be a danger you would be ok with the SWAT team taking you in handcuffs to a mental health screening while they confiscated your personal property? He asked if he was going to be handcuffed and taken from his house.... QuotePyles sought assurances from police that he wouldn't be arrested, handcuffed or taken from his home if he came out. He also asked whether he could take a shower before coming out to talk and was permitted to do so. He called Clauson at 6:48 a.m. and said he was ready to come out. And they did it anyway. And the ACLU not getting involved is classic. If this had been something other than a gun issue they would be all over it. Sources: http://www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100328/NEWS/3280325 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #54 June 16, 2010 QuoteBe that as it may, you'll notice a number of details vary considerably from the article linked in the original post. For instance, a call at 6am is hardly the "middle of the night." for me it would be! That time is the absolute worst time - I'm more lucid at 3am. Yes, this series of articles had more much detail. A key aspect is that they were written weeks apart, and did not appear to have too strong a bias. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #55 June 16, 2010 Quote6am is hardly the "middle of the night." It is for 9 out of 10 college students. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites