kallend 2,184 #51 June 12, 2010 Quote Quote Quote . . . Where DID those seven extra states come from? What exactly is Cinco de Quatro and why is he celebrating it? How DID he get long list of fallen heros in the audience that day! Go ahead - you'll bring up Bush and his quirky way of speaking - but he is NO LONGER PRESIDENT - GET OVER IT! We should have some fresh material soon too. Because i know some of you out there have some! I wonder if Fox ever did this for Bush. Holy hell they would have needed an hour long segment for his first term alone! BUT, they probably didn't. So... back to the thread. yep...the ol "but Bush" arguement! That has lost it's legs..BUSH DOESN'T MATTER ANYMORE, HE IS NOT PRESIDENT! why can't the obamabots get past that? Its because you Obamahaters keep yearning for the Good Ole Days when "W" and Saint Ron were running up the deficits and finding pretexts for declaring war on Grenada and Iraq. If the best you can offer is "W" or Sarah P, then clearly we're better off with O.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TankBuster 0 #52 June 13, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote . . . Where DID those seven extra states come from? What exactly is Cinco de Quatro and why is he celebrating it? How DID he get long list of fallen heros in the audience that day! Go ahead - you'll bring up Bush and his quirky way of speaking - but he is NO LONGER PRESIDENT - GET OVER IT! We should have some fresh material soon too. Because i know some of you out there have some! I wonder if Fox ever did this for Bush. Holy hell they would have needed an hour long segment for his first term alone! BUT, they probably didn't. So... back to the thread. yep...the ol "but Bush" arguement! That has lost it's legs..BUSH DOESN'T MATTER ANYMORE, HE IS NOT PRESIDENT! why can't the obamabots get past that? Its because you Obamahaters keep yearning for the Good Ole Days when "W" and Saint Ron were running up the deficits and finding pretexts for declaring war on Grenada and Iraq. If the best you can offer is "W" or Sarah P, then clearly we're better off with O. Soooooo. How do Saint Ron's and W's deficits compare to Oblamer's?The forecast is mostly sunny with occasional beer. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LyraM45 0 #53 June 14, 2010 Quote Quote Quote . . . Where DID those seven extra states come from? What exactly is Cinco de Quatro and why is he celebrating it? How DID he get long list of fallen heros in the audience that day! Go ahead - you'll bring up Bush and his quirky way of speaking - but he is NO LONGER PRESIDENT - GET OVER IT! We should have some fresh material soon too. Because i know some of you out there have some! I wonder if Fox ever did this for Bush. Holy hell they would have needed an hour long segment for his first term alone! BUT, they probably didn't. So... back to the thread. yep...the ol "but Bush" arguement! That has lost it's legs..BUSH DOESN'T MATTER ANYMORE, HE IS NOT PRESIDENT! why can't the obamabots get past that? Ha! I wouldn't call myself an Obamabot. Quite the contrary, the reason I asked the question if Fox had done is for Bush is because I am INDEPENDENT and would like to see it done for both sides! I'm sure CNN has run "bloopers" for Bush and past presidents, but I've also seen them run gaffes for Obama AND Biden. I just have a little bit more respect when a network can poke fun all around and NOT just as one side.Apologies for the spelling (and grammar).... I got a B.S, not a B.A. :) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hwt 0 #54 June 14, 2010 Its because you Obamahaters keep yearning for the Good Ole Days when "W" and Saint Ron were running up the deficits and finding pretexts for declaring war on Grenada and Iraq. If the best you can offer is "W" or Sarah P, then clearly we're better off with O. _________________________________________________ I wish Ronald Reagan was in charge, because this socialist clown we have now has borrowed more money from China and spent more money on paying back his union buddies and ran up the deficit more than all the past presidents combined. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #55 June 15, 2010 Quote Quote . . . Where DID those seven extra states come from? What exactly is Cinco de Quatro and why is he celebrating it? How DID he get long list of fallen heros in the audience that day! Go ahead - you'll bring up Bush and his quirky way of speaking - but he is NO LONGER PRESIDENT - GET OVER IT! We should have some fresh material soon too. Because i know some of you out there have some! I wonder if Fox ever did this for Bush. Holy hell they would have needed an hour long segment for his first term alone! BUT, they probably didn't. So... back to the thread. Wow - No comment on the current material and stuck in the past. Nice.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LyraM45 0 #56 June 15, 2010 Quote Quote Quote . . . Where DID those seven extra states come from? What exactly is Cinco de Quatro and why is he celebrating it? How DID he get long list of fallen heros in the audience that day! Go ahead - you'll bring up Bush and his quirky way of speaking - but he is NO LONGER PRESIDENT - GET OVER IT! We should have some fresh material soon too. Because i know some of you out there have some! I wonder if Fox ever did this for Bush. Holy hell they would have needed an hour long segment for his first term alone! BUT, they probably didn't. So... back to the thread. Wow - No comment on the current material and stuck in the past. Nice. I didn't deliberately avoid it, so I'll go ahead and comment. I think he sounds like an idiot when he says something like 57 states. No argument there. Just like every public figure that speaks and stumbles over their words or the content of their words. (big caveat being I can tell the difference between somebody who innocently fumbles over words or content versus somebody who truly is an under educated moron). I was never denying what he said sounded totally asinine if not funny, just as it did for Bush and other previous presidents when they've stumbled, but I never saw Fox air anything like this on Bush, hence my question that innocently popped up in my head. So... now that I've addressed current material and basically think what you wanted to hear anyway, is my question about Fox airing similar piece on Bush valid?Apologies for the spelling (and grammar).... I got a B.S, not a B.A. :) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #57 June 15, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote . . . Where DID those seven extra states come from? What exactly is Cinco de Quatro and why is he celebrating it? How DID he get long list of fallen heros in the audience that day! Go ahead - you'll bring up Bush and his quirky way of speaking - but he is NO LONGER PRESIDENT - GET OVER IT! We should have some fresh material soon too. Because i know some of you out there have some! I wonder if Fox ever did this for Bush. Holy hell they would have needed an hour long segment for his first term alone! BUT, they probably didn't. So... back to the thread. Wow - No comment on the current material and stuck in the past. Nice. I didn't deliberately avoid it, so I'll go ahead and comment. I think he sounds like an idiot when he says something like 57 states. No argument there. Just like every public figure that speaks and stumbles over their words or the content of their words. (big caveat being I can tell the difference between somebody who innocently fumbles over words or content versus somebody who truly is an under educated moron). I was never denying what he said sounded totally asinine if not funny, just as it did for Bush and other previous presidents when they've stumbled, but I never saw Fox air anything like this on Bush, hence my question that innocently popped up in my head. So... now that I've addressed current material and basically think what you wanted to hear anyway, is my question about Fox airing similar piece on Bush valid? Not really. They are a biased media source.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
