0
Amazon

Joran van der Sloot Detained in Peru

Recommended Posts

Quote

Yup, even have a copy of his typed out confession and the dutch translation.....



Gotta love those old CRANK type phones... or the old crank type radios that you still see in police stations in the third world.

You have the right to BZZZZZZZZZZT...... If you have a right to BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT.... If you need a doctor...BBBBZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

his lawyer was there



Neither you nor I are in a position to know the complete circumstances of his interrogation.

In any event, admissibility of his confession would be only one issue if he was in the US. The other issue would be whether he could ever get an impartial jury, given that the police have bent over backwards to try and convict him in the news media. And I have to admit (confess?) - they've done a pretty good job of it.

Anyhow, it's not the US, it's Peru, so whatever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Neither you nor I are in a position to know the complete circumstances of his interrogation.



The notes give a pretty good account of who was there, who was doing the interrogating and who was there from the Dutch Embassy to do the translating for him.

What happened outside of what is described in the notes, you are right, we don't know the circumstances.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Neither you nor I are in a position to know the complete circumstances of his interrogation.



The notes give a pretty good account of who was there, who was doing the interrogating and who was there from the Dutch Embassy to do the translating for him.



They give an account; I have no idea how good or complete an account that may or may not be.

And as I said - that aside, why is all this being made public now, and seemingly almost in real time? I guess "trial" is a very different concept in Peru than what I'm used to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure if i understand all this talk about the interogation...:|

just so long as he's had made the admission that he did it...
For me.. the Video evidence, which validates the sensible timing between events,,
puts That Kid... WITH the Girl in the casino, then in the hotel... then into the room...with no evidence of any others entering the room, that same way... ( not sure if window entry was possible by another,, or an adjoining door to another room....) But he was Preying on her...
for her money maybe.. perhaps more,,,
as he's been presented as a jet setter .. and gambler, and that costs $$$..
not sure of his sources of income.. but we're told he extorted $$$ from the Holloway family....
he's bad news, and is unneeded any more , on this planet....
prison??? hell no..
" insane " defense??.. forget it. He needs to pay the piper... he blew it... he was the son of a person of stature,, got to travel the world... enjoy fancy places.... and he chose to ply his trade, as a Romeo.....
instead of becoming productive, and following in his fathers footsteps .
My gut tells me that if he was into "spiking womens' drinks",, then he has done much more damage than we'll ever know..and so just WHAT level of sentencing would be right???? I guess you can't Kill him.....so
i say.. a year for the cumulative ages of those he killed... So there is 40 something right there with what we know of...... and if he admits to more... then we hit 60 80 100 years... real quick...
good riddance...

jimmy out...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He claimed he entered with $25,000 US. He further explains where the money comes from (most of it from some Dutch tv show that paid for info from him or something like that)

I think he lists $6,000 or $9,000 from the family private investigator for information regarding the case.

Also details how he killed her and that he put on some of her clothes after the killing.

He did take the money from her wallet, doesn't seem like there was a whole lot in it though.

He claims she hit him on the head first, which infuriated him so much that he elbowed her in the nose, strangeled her with his hands and subsequently with his shirt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yikes!!!

thanks SkyDekker for those details...

pooor joran....
I 'got hit on the head' a bunch of times!!!! Myself ,,,,especially as a kid !
smacked across the back of the head usually,,,,[:/] and once in a while...kicked in the ass....
It was sorta how we were raised,,, in the 1950's and 60's..

AND
I didn't plant a vicious elbow into anyopne.. i didn't strangle anyone. I didn't go berserk and take someones' LIFE!
i mostly didn't even respond... since the disiplinarian was my Father...whom i respected then,,, and resepct now.
I took it as a lesson learned,, it never happened without justification...
and it's severity was never to the point of injury... but it was how kids were disciplined.. and it Worked... at least in the case of me and my siblings..
A man who would knee-jerk react,,,, like that to the bridge of the nose,, of ANY woman...is a beast...has real issues,,,was spoiled as a child,,, has been seeing way tooo many violent movies,,, playing way to many violent videos, has never learned restraint,, in any part of his life... and HAS to be taken down...
jt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

his lawyer was there



Neither you nor I are in a position to know the complete circumstances of his interrogation.

In any event, admissibility of his confession would be only one issue if he was in the US. The other issue would be whether he could ever get an impartial jury, given that the police have bent over backwards to try and convict him in the news media. And I have to admit (confess?) - they've done a pretty good job of it.

Anyhow, it's not the US, it's Peru, so whatever.



We in the U.S. compare the rest of the world to what is in the U.S.A. From food to laws, whatever. However van der Sloot is interrogated, tried and or convicted is up to Peruvian law and the way they do things. We really don't have any say in it. It might be different if, he had broken some law in the U.S. but he hasn't. We can only be observers.


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I was using US law not as a "gold standard" which other systems must either achieve or be deemed lacking, but simply as a convenient frame of reference for comparison and analysis.



Yessir! I understood that and wasn't referring to you but rather, the U.S. population in general. In that we don't seem to understand it unless it's 'like in the U.S.'


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Yup! We'll have to see first if he does get convicted in Peru. If, he is not convicted in Peru, does this mean that the Dutch will once again drop the Holloway case?



Who knows. At the end of the interrogation he dangles a carrot. Get me out of Peru and I'll "help" with the Holloway case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Yup! We'll have to see first if he does get convicted in Peru. If, he is not convicted in Peru, does this mean that the Dutch will once again drop the Holloway case?



Who knows. At the end of the interrogation he dangles a carrot. Get me out of Peru and I'll "help" with the Holloway case.



That's his M.O. He tells some 'story' then say's he lied. The authorities are wise to him and take him with a grain of salt. What Dutch authorities should do is 'visit' him in Peru. Then see how talkative he is.

Just heard! van der Sloot's private attorney quit him! Noone knows if, van der Sloot will get a court appointed attorney or not.


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Yup! We'll have to see first if he does get convicted in Peru. If, he is not convicted in Peru, does this mean that the Dutch will once again drop the Holloway case?



Who knows. At the end of the interrogation he dangles a carrot. Get me out of Peru and I'll "help" with the Holloway case.


That's his M.O. He tells some 'story' then say's he lied. The authorities are wise to him and take him with a grain of salt. What Dutch authorities should do is 'visit' him in Peru. Then see how talkative he is.

Just heard! van der Sloot's private attorney quit him! Noone knows if, van der Sloot will get a court appointed attorney or not.


Chuck


Or if they wanted to, take his sorry ass back to Aruba and have him SHOW where the body is. If there is anything left that can be identified, then the case can be closed, and then ship his sorry ass back to Peru to serve for his crime there, but don't tell him that part beforehand. :P
"Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Yup! We'll have to see first if he does get convicted in Peru. If, he is not convicted in Peru, does this mean that the Dutch will once again drop the Holloway case?



Who knows. At the end of the interrogation he dangles a carrot. Get me out of Peru and I'll "help" with the Holloway case.


That's his M.O. He tells some 'story' then say's he lied. The authorities are wise to him and take him with a grain of salt. What Dutch authorities should do is 'visit' him in Peru. Then see how talkative he is.

Just heard! van der Sloot's private attorney quit him! Noone knows if, van der Sloot will get a court appointed attorney or not.


Chuck


Or if they wanted to, take his sorry ass back to Aruba and have him SHOW where the body is. If there is anything left that can be identified, then the case can be closed, and then ship his sorry ass back to Peru to serve for his crime there, but don't tell him that part beforehand. :P


There ya' go! Sounds good to me! I guess, if he throws the cops a slider, they could ship his sorry ass back to Peru and put him in 'gen-pop'!
What I'm curious about is, one of his 'tales', he mentioned that Natalie wanted to see the sharks or something like that. I'd just imagine, he raped her, murdered her and had his two buddies throw her body in the ocean where the sharks are.


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


What I'm curious about is, one of his 'tales', he mentioned that Natalie wanted to see the sharks or something like that. I'd just imagine, he raped her, murdered her and had his two buddies throw her body in the ocean where the sharks are.

Chuck



Ding ding ding...we have a winner. Few people realize the shark problem Aruba has. Hotels and restaurants dump their food into the ocean up by California lighthouse in an effort to keep the sharks in that area and away from Palm Beach and the resorts. I've said for years that she, and probably a few others have been fed to the sharks after Joran and his friends had their way with them.
Please don't dent the planet.

Destinations by Roxanne

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


What I'm curious about is, one of his 'tales', he mentioned that Natalie wanted to see the sharks or something like that. I'd just imagine, he raped her, murdered her and had his two buddies throw her body in the ocean where the sharks are.

Chuck



Ding ding ding...we have a winner. Few people realize the shark problem Aruba has. Hotels and restaurants dump their food into the ocean up by California lighthouse in an effort to keep the sharks in that area and away from Palm Beach and the resorts. I've said for years that she, and probably a few others have been fed to the sharks after Joran and his friends had their way with them.



That's what Peruvian police are wondering... how many others? Sadly, we may never know.


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote


What I'm curious about is, one of his 'tales', he mentioned that Natalie wanted to see the sharks or something like that. I'd just imagine, he raped her, murdered her and had his two buddies throw her body in the ocean where the sharks are.

Chuck



Ding ding ding...we have a winner. Few people realize the shark problem Aruba has. Hotels and restaurants dump their food into the ocean up by California lighthouse in an effort to keep the sharks in that area and away from Palm Beach and the resorts. I've said for years that she, and probably a few others have been fed to the sharks after Joran and his friends had their way with them.



That's what Peruvian police are wondering... how many others? Sadly, we may never know.


Chuck



You aren't the only one wondering that.

Discovery News
"There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy

"~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Chilean and Peruvian police feel the same way. After reading all the columns and hearing the news stories about this guy, it's fairly difficult to feel otherwise.


Chuck



I agree. He sounds more and more like a classic predator. He had a protected life of privilege, and that grew into a sense of entitlement. By getting away with the stuff he did (when his father protected him), that sense of entitlement was reinforced.

I wonder how many other cases his father's influence protected him from.
"There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy

"~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Chilean and Peruvian police feel the same way. After reading all the columns and hearing the news stories about this guy, it's fairly difficult to feel otherwise.



That's exactly my point. Assuming you are typical, how could he possibly get an impartial jury?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Chilean and Peruvian police feel the same way. After reading all the columns and hearing the news stories about this guy, it's fairly difficult to feel otherwise.


Chuck



I agree. He sounds more and more like a classic predator. He had a protected life of privilege, and that grew into a sense of entitlement. By getting away with the stuff he did (when his father protected him), that sense of entitlement was reinforced.

I wonder how many other cases his father's influence protected him from.



Good question.


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0